[1] [1] PA J P, MITRA A, WARRI H V. A review on the hydrodynamic acteristics of autonomous underwater vehicles[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering f the Maritime Environment, 2021, 235(1): 1529.

[15] [15] ZHUANG J Y, CAO J, SU Y M, et al. Experimental study on hydrodynamic perfmance of miniAUV in nonunifm flow field[C]ASME 2019 38th International Conference on Ocean, Offshe Arctic Engineering. Glasgow: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019.

[16] H HUANG, Z X ZHOU, J Y LI et al. Investigation on the mechanical design and manipulation hydrodynamics for a small sized, single body and streamlined I-AUV. Ocean Engineering, 186, 106106(2019).

[17] J Y BAE, K H SOHN. A study on manoeuvring motion characteristics of manta-type unmanned undersea vehicle. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 46, 114-126(2009).

[18] J Y BAE, K H SOHN, J KIM. A study on mathematical model of manoeuvring motion of manta-type unmanned undersea vehicle at large attack angles. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 47, 328-341(2010).

[21] [21] DU X X, SONG B W, PAN G. Effect of ocean current to low velocity maneuvers of tpedolike longdistance AUV[C]2009 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology Automation. Changsha: IEEE, 2009: 575578.

[22] K YANG, H C SUI, L AN et al. Modeling and maneuverability simulation for vertical plane of autonomous underwater vehicle in current. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 435, 012060(2018).

[23] A T NEDELCU, C FAITAR, L STAN et al. The vehicle movement using computational fluid dynamics method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 591, 012110(2019).

[24] M C FANG, J H CHEN, J H LUO et al. On the behavior of an underwater remotely operated vehicle in a uniform current. Marine Technology and SNAME News, 45, 241-249(2008).

[25] [25] CHEN C W, JIANG Y, HUANG C H, et al. Computational fluid dynamics study on Magnus fce of an autonomous underwater helicopter[C]Oceans 2017Anchage. Anchage: IEEE, 2017: 1–6.

[26] C W CHEN, Y JIANG, H C HUANG et al. Computational fluid dynamics study of the motion stability of an autonomous underwater helicopter. Ocean Engineering, 143, 227-239(2017).

[27] C W CHEN, Y JIANG. Computational fluid dynamics study of Magnus force on an axis-symmetric, disk-type AUV with symmetric propulsion. Symmetry, 11, 397(2019).

[28] R GABL, T DAVEY, Y CAO et al. Experimental force data of a restrained ROV under waves and current. Data, 5, 57(2020).

[29] R GABL, T DAVEY, Y CAO et al. Hydrodynamic loads on a restrained ROV under waves and current. Ocean Engineering, 234, 109279(2021).

[31] [31] YAO X L, MENG L W, WANG F, et al. Investigation of thrust load acteristics of AUV propeller under the condition of different angle incoming flow[C]Oceans 2016Shanghai. Shanghai: IEEE, 2016.

[32] Y DAI, Y Y ZHANG, J N BIAN et al. CFD simulation on hydrodynamics of underwater vehicle with ducted propellers. International Journal of Simulation Modelling, 20, 595-605(2021).

[33] [33] MITRA A, PA J P, WARRI H V. The hydrodynamic acteristics of autonomous underwater vehicles in rotating flow fields[JOL]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering f the Maritime Environment, 2023. (20230622)[20230825]. https:journals.sagepub.comdoi10.117714750902231181843.

[35] [35] KIM M G, CHO G R, KANG H J, et al. Prototype development of underwater vehicle overcoming strong current[C]2017 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots Ambient Intelligence (URAI). Jeju: IEEE, 2017: 860−862.

[36] [36] BIELAŃSKI J. The analysis of hydrodynamic fces shape of towrope f an underwater vehicle[J]. Polish Maritime Research, 2007, 14(Supp 2): 83−94.

[37] M T VU, H S CHOI, J KANG et al. A study on hovering motion of the underwater vehicle with umbilical cable. Ocean Engineering, 135, 137-157(2017).

[38] C Y ZHAO, P THIES, J LARS et al. ROV launch and recovery from an unmanned autonomous surface vessel–hydrodynamic modelling and system integration. Ocean Engineering, 232, 109019(2021).

[40] H SINGH, J G BELLINGHAM, F HOVER et al. Docking for an autonomous ocean sampling network. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 26, 498-514(2001).

[41] L H WU, Y P LI, S J SU et al. Hydrodynamic analysis of AUV underwater docking with a cone-shaped dock under ocean currents. Ocean Engineering, 85, 110-126(2014).

[43] S S FAN, B LI, W XU et al. Impact of current disturbances on AUV docking: model-based motion prediction and countering approaches. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 43, 888-904(2018).

[44] [44] MONDEN T, YAMASHITA K, KA Y, et al. Successful repeated docking under fluctuating current disturbances in real sea[C]Oceans 2019 MTSIEEE SEATTLE. Seattle, WA, USA: IEEE, 2019: 1–6.

[45] J ESTEBA, P CIEŚLAK, N PALOMERAS et al. Docking of non-holonomic AUVs in presence of ocean currents: a comparative survey. IEEE Access, 9, 86607-86631(2021).

[46] T Z ZHANG, X H MIAO, Y B LI et al. AUV 3D docking control using deep reinforcement learning. Ocean Engineering, 283, 115021(2023).

[47] [47] DU X X, ZHENG Z Q, GUAN S M. Numerical calculation of hydrodynamic interactions of submarine flow on AUV[C]2018 OceansMTSIEEE Kobe TechnoOceans (OTO). Kobe, Japan: IEEE, 2018.

[57] L S MENG, Y LIN, H T GU et al. Study on dynamic docking process and collision problems of captured-rod docking method. Ocean Engineering, 193, 106624(2019).

[58] [58] DU X, ZHAO X, ZHANG W, et al. A novel analytical recovery controller f autonomous underwater vehicles[C]Oceans 2019Marseille. New Yk: IEEE, 2019.

[59] N PALOMERAS, G VALLICROSA, A MALLIOS et al. AUV homing and docking for remote operations. Ocean Engineering, 154, 106-120(2018).

[60] [60] SANSMUNTADAS A, PETTERSEN K Y, BREKKE E, et al. A hybrid approach to underwater docking of AUVs with crosscurrent[C]Oceans 2016 MTSIEEE. Monterey, CA, USA: IEEE, 2016: 1−7.

[63] [63] ZHU Z B, HU S L J, LI H J. Effect on Kalman based underwater tracking due to ocean current uncertainty[C]2016 IEEEOES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV).Tokyo, Japan: IEEE, 2016: 131137.

[64] Z P DONG, L WAN, T LIU et al. Horizontal-plane trajectory-tracking control of an underactuated unmanned marine vehicle in the presence of ocean currents. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 13, 83(2016).

[65] B RHOADS, I MEZIĆ, A C POJE. Minimum time heading control of underpowered vehicles in time-varying ocean currents. Ocean Engineering, 66, 12-31(2013).

[66] P G THOMASSON, C A WOOLSEY. Vehicle motion in currents. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 38, 226-242(2013).

[67] S Y XU, J M WU, X Y YANG et al. Trajectory tracking and hydrodynamics of a tethered underwater vehicle based on hybrid grid. Ocean Engineering, 241, 110051(2021).

[68] S Y XU, J M WU. The maneuverability and hydrodynamics of a tethered underwater vehicle based on adaptive mesh refinement. Ocean Engineering, 265, 112644(2022).

[72] SILVA COSTA G DA, M P ALMEIDA, MELO FILHO A R V DE et al. 3-D realistic simulations over a Flatfish shaped AUV submitted to ocean currents. Applied Ocean Research, 90, 101849(2019).

[73] A HONARYAR, M GHIASI. Design of a bio-inspired hull shape for an AUV from hydrodynamic stability point of view through experiment and numerical analysis. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 15, 950-959(2018).

[74] Y C LI, Z MA. Numerical investigation on novel conceptual design of hybrid-driven autonomous underwater glider with active twin flapping foils. Ocean Engineering, 214, 107867(2020).

[75] A LI, S X GUO, M LIU et al. Hydrodynamic characteristic-based adaptive model predictive control for the spherical underwater robot under ocean current disturbance. Machines, 10, 798(2022).

[76] [76] WEI T J, ZHOU Z Y, WANG Y D, et al. Hydrodynamic study of hybrid aerial underwater vehicle in the wind, wave, current environment[C]2023 IEEE Underwater Technology (UT). Tokyo, Japan: IEEE, 2023: 1–6.

[77] H SAGHI, J PARUNOV. Hydrodynamic force of resistance of tourist underwater vehicle's bare hull with different heads using OpenFOAM. NAŠE MORE: Znanstveni Časopis za More i Pomorstvo, 70, 11-22(2023).

[78] G XUE, F G BAI, Z T LI et al. Experiment for effect of attack angle and environmental condition on hydrodynamics of near-surface swimming fish-like robot. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2023, 4377779(2023).

[79] P SUEBSAIPROM, C L LIN. Maneuverability modeling and trajectory tracking for fish robot. Control Engineering Practice, 45, 22-36(2015).

[88] L ZHANG, B KONG, S Y LIN et al. Fluid-structure interaction problem of hydrodynamic motion of an independent escape capsule under variable constraint conditions. Ocean Engineering, 187, 106198(2019).

[89] [89] WANG Z L, DONG Z W, HE R, et al. Numerical simulation of submarine surfacing with 6 DOF model in the ocean current effect[C]The Twelfth ISOPE PacificAsia Offshe Mechanics Symposium. Gold Coast, Australia: ISOPE , 2016.

[93] Y H XING, O GAIDAI, Y C MA et al. A novel design approach for estimation of extreme responses of a subsea shuttle tanker hovering in ocean current considering aft thruster failure. Applied Ocean Research, 123, 103179(2022).

[94] G ANTONELLI. On the use of adaptive/integral actions for six-degrees-of-freedom control of autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 32, 300-312(2007).

[95] S HESHMATI-ALAMDARI, A NIKOU, D V DIMAROGONAS. Robust trajectory tracking control for underactuated autonomous underwater vehicles in uncertain environments. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 18, 1288-1301(2021).

[96] M W HASAN, N H ABBAS. Disturbance rejection for underwater robotic vehicle based on adaptive fuzzy with nonlinear PID controller. ISA Transactions, 130, 360-376(2022).

[97] G XUE, Y J LIU, Z J SHI et al. Research on trajectory tracking control of underwater vehicle manipulator system based on model-free adaptive control method. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10, 652(2022).

[98] [98] QI Z G, JIN H Z, ZHOU A L, et al. Research on a method to reduce roll pitch of AUV based on active bionic fin stabilizer[C]2011 Chinese Control Decision Conference (CCDC). Mianyang, China: IEEE, 2011: 2778−2782.

[99] P GONG, Z P YAN, W ZHANG et al. Trajectory tracking control for autonomous underwater vehicles based on dual closed-loop of MPC with uncertain dynamics. Ocean Engineering, 265, 112697(2022).

[100] [100] LI A, GUO S X, SHI L W, et al. Study on hydrodynamic acteristics dynamics model of underwater spherical robot[C]2021 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics Automation (ICMA). Takamatsu, Japan: IEEE, 2021: 633−638.

[101] E KIM, S S FAN, N BOSE et al. Current estimation and path following for an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) by using a high-gain observer based on an AUV dynamic model. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 19, 478-490(2021).

[102] W CHEN, X L LIU, Z A FENG et al. Improved line-of-sight nonlinear trajectory tracking control of autonomous underwater vehicle exposed to high variable speed ocean currents. Ocean Engineering, 277, 114149(2023).

[106] X H LI, S H YU. Three-dimensional path planning for AUVs in ocean currents environment based on an improved compression factor particle swarm optimization algorithm. Ocean Engineering, 280, 114610(2023).

[107] D J ZHU, S X YANG. Bio-inspired neural network-based optimal path planning for UUVs under the effect of ocean currents. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 7, 231-239(2022).

[108] Z Z CHU, F L WANG, T J LEI et al. Path planning based on deep reinforcement learning for autonomous underwater vehicles under ocean current disturbance. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 8, 108-120(2023).

[109] J C YANG, J F NI, M XI et al. Intelligent path planning of underwater robot based on reinforcement learning. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 20, 1983-1996(2023).