Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 40, Issue 4, 406001(2020)

Analysis of Single-Scatter Path Loss in Wireless Ultraviolet Communication in Mobile Scene

Song Peng, Liu Chun*, Zhu Lei, Zhang Lijian, and Zhang Xiaodan
Author Affiliations
  • School of Electronics and Information, Xi''an Polytechnic University, Xi''an, Shaanxi 710048, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    NLOS UV single-scatter propagation model in non-coplanar geometry
    Determine the upper and lower limits of r. (a) Situation 1; (b) situation 2
    Determine the upper and lower limits of θ and α. (a) Situation 1; (b) situation 2
    Schematic diagram of the center point of micro element V″ in the non-line-of-sight non-coplanar ultraviolet single-scatter transmission model
    Schematic diagram of research
    Influence of node's position change on path loss
    Comparison of simulation results between TTUM and MC method
    Influence of elevation angle change of transmitter on path loss. (a) 0° path; (b) 45° path; (c) 90° path; (d) 135° path; (e) 180° path
    Influence of elevation angle change of receiver on path loss. (a) 0° path; (b) 45° path; (c) 90° path; (d) 135° path; (e) 180° path
    Influence of elevation angle consistent change of transceiver on path loss. (a) 0° path; (b) 45° path; (c) 90° path; (d) 135° path; (e) 180° path
    Influence of beam divergence angle change on path loss. (a) 0° path; (b) 45° path; (c) 90° path; (d) 135° path; (e) 180° path
    Influence of FOV angle change on path loss. (a) 0° path; (b) 45° path; (c) 90° path; (d) 135° path; (e) 180° path
    • Table 1. Part of simulation parameters

      View table

      Table 1. Part of simulation parameters

      ParameterValue
      Wavelength λ /nm266
      Rayleigh scattering coefficient ksR /(10-3 m-1)0.24
      Mie scattering coefficient ksM /(10-3 m-1)0.25
      Absorption coefficient ka /(10-3 m-1)0.74
      Rayleigh phase function scattering parameter γ0.017
      Mie phase function asymmetry parameter g0.72
      Mie phase function parameter f0.5
      Speed of light c /(108 m·s-1)3
      Receiving aperture radius r /(10-2 m)1.5
      Division times M10
    • Table 2. Value of V when the receiver moves in 180° direction

      View table

      Table 2. Value of V when the receiver moves in 180° direction

      Moving distance R /mCommunication distance /mV /m3
      010024858.05
      109018121.51
      208012727.31
      30708526.29
      40605369.31
      50503107.23
      60401590.89
      7030671.14
      8020198.83
      901024.83
    • Table 3. Contrast data between TTUM and MC

      View table

      Table 3. Contrast data between TTUM and MC

      Moving distance R /mSimulation time /sTime difference /sPL /dBPL difference /dB
      TTUMMCTTUMMC
      08.713849.610040.896289.343089.57400.2310
      108.695449.578240.882889.875790.12280.2471
      208.720549.594840.874390.768591.00460.2361
      308.640749.860341.219691.791691.97810.1865
      408.583749.564840.981192.856592.99450.1380
      508.608549.362240.753793.880893.99240.1116
      608.555049.612741.057794.937794.99090.0532
      708.522249.357540.835395.908295.96980.0616
      808.486749.282940.796296.808796.86880.0601
      908.491949.420640.928797.636597.74060.1041
      1008.451649.173640.722098.478898.56980.0910
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Song Peng, Liu Chun, Zhu Lei, Zhang Lijian, Zhang Xiaodan. Analysis of Single-Scatter Path Loss in Wireless Ultraviolet Communication in Mobile Scene[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(4): 406001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Fiber Optics and Optical Communications

    Received: Jul. 2, 2019

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Feb. 11, 2020

    The Author Email: Chun Liu (liucc_116@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202040.0406001

    Topics