Researching | Circuit Simulation of GJB151B CS115 Part І: The analysis of calibration equipment indicators

High Power Laser and Particle Beams, Volume. 34, Issue 2, 023002(2022)

Circuit Simulation of GJB151B CS115 Part І: The analysis of calibration equipment indicators

Zhitong Cui... Wei Chen, Yayun Dong, Xin Nie, Wei Wu and Feng Qin |Show fewer author(s)

Author Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Intense Pulsed Radiation Simulation and Effect, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures&Tables (11)

Paper Information

Figures & Tables(11)

Fig. 1. Requirements of calibration setup and waveform in CS115

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 2. Circuit model of the calibration platform in CS115

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 3. Measured and simulated VSWR of FCC-BCICF-1

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 4. Direct output and calibration waveform under reference setup in simulation

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 5. Simulated calibration waveform with different L₀ of pulsed current source

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 6. Simulated calibration waveforms with different L_eq

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 7. Simulated calibration waveforms with different R_eq

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 8. Simulated calibration waveforms with different L_f and C_f

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 9. Regions of current injection probe indicators according to the ferrite-core impedance

Download full size

View in Article

Table 1. Indicators of calibration waveform with different L₀ , L_eq and R_eq

View in Article

Table 1. Indicators of calibration waveform with different L₀ , L_eq and R_eq

		rise time/ns	fall time/ns	V_RE/kV	V_FE/kV	F_DR/%
impulse generator output with 50 Ω load		0.7	1.1	1	1	0
L₀=32 nH, R_eq=216 Ω, L_eq=17.5 μH		1.2	1.4	0.59	0.49	17
inductance of the generator	L₀=46 nH	1.3	1.7	0.58	0.49	16
inductance of the generator	L₀=60 nH	1.5	2.1	0.56	0.49	13
R_eq of the injection probe model	R_eq=8 Ω	1.3	1.5	0.13	0.12	8
	R_eq=32 Ω	1.3	1.5	0.34	0.30	12
	R_eq=120 Ω	1.2	1.4	0.54	0.46	15
	R_eq=480 Ω	1.2	1.4	0.64	0.53	17
L_eq of the injection probe model	L_eq=2 μH	1.2	1.4	0.59	0.27	54
	L_eq=5 μH	1.2	1.4	0.59	0.40	32
	L_eq=12.5 μH	1.2	1.4	0.59	0.47	20
	L_eq=30 μH	1.2	1.4	0.59	0.51	14

Table 2. The rise time and fall time of calibration waveform with different R_eq and C_eq

View in Article

Table 2. The rise time and fall time of calibration waveform with different R_eq and C_eq

	C_eq=10 pF			C_eq=20 pF			C_eq=30 pF			C_eq=40 pF			C_eq=50 pF
	t_r/ns	t_p/ns		t_r/ns	t_p/ns		t_r/ns	t_p/ns		t_r/ns	t_p/ns		t_r/ns	t_p/ns
R_eq=8 Ω	1.3	1.4		1.3	1.5		1.3	1.5		1.4	1.6		1.4	1.6
R_eq=32 Ω	1.2	1.4		1.3	1.5		1.4	1.6		1.6	1.8		1.8	2.0
R_eq=120 Ω	1.2	1.4		1.3	1.5		1.6	1.8		1.9	2.2		2.4	2.6
R_eq=216 Ω	1.1	1.3		1.4	1.5		1.7	1.9		2.1	2.3		2.6	2.9
R_eq=400 Ω	1.0	1.3		1.4	1.5		1.7	1.9		2.2	2.4		2.8	3.0

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Zhitong Cui, Wei Chen, Yayun Dong, Xin Nie, Wei Wu, Feng Qin. Circuit Simulation of GJB151B CS115 Part І: The analysis of calibration equipment indicators[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2022, 34(2): 023002

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: High Power Microwave Technology

Received: Sep. 10, 2021

Accepted: Nov. 24, 2021

Published Online: Jan. 26, 2022

The Author Email:

DOI:10.11884/HPLPB202234.210406

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology