Chinese Physics B, Volume. 29, Issue 8, (2020)

Low-power electro–optic phase modulator based on multilayer graphene/silicon nitride waveguide

Lanting Ji1,2, Wei Chen1, Yang Gao1, Yan Xu1, Chi Wu2, Xibin Wang1, Yunji Yi1, Baohua Li1, Xiaoqiang Sun1、†, and Daming Zhang1
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Integrated Optoelectronics, College of Electronic Science & Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 3002, China
  • 2Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 50100, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    (a) Three-dimensional (3D) and (b) cross-sectional view of the graphene-based Si3N4 waveguide electro–optic modulator.
    In-plane permittivity changes with Fermi level μc of graphene at 1550 nm.
    Im(Neff) of SiN waveguide as a function of hSiN and wSiN when μc is 0 eV (λ = 1550 nm).
    Cross-section of (a) two-layer, (c) four-layer, and (e) six-layer GSNW configurations. Panels (b), (d), and (f) show field distributions of panels (a), (c), and (e), respectively.
    (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of Neff as a function of Fermi level for different graphene layers.
    Illustration of (a) quasi-linear variation of the optical phase, and (b) optical MPA versus Fermi levels for different numbers of graphene layer.
    Optical transmission of the MZI modulator changes with applied gate voltages for the 80-μm-long graphene with different layers.
    Illustration of (a) quasi-linear variation of the optical phase, and (b) insertion loss versus Fermi levels for different graphene modulation lengths.
    Normalized transmission of the MZI modulator changes with applied gate voltage for the two-layer graphene at different modulating lengths.
    Equivalent electrical circuits of (a) two-, (b) four-, and (c) six-layer graphene modulators.
    • Table 1. Modulating performance of different GSNW modulators.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Modulating performance of different GSNW modulators.

      StructureMZI
      Layer number246
      Lg/μm801602408016024080160240
      Ctotal/pF0.3220.6320.9420.6321.2521.8720.9421.8722.802
      Rtotal10.55.253.505.252.631.753.501.751.17
      ΔU/V3.601.020.491.070.340.200.480.190.14
      Power/(pJ/bit)1.0430.1640.0570.1810.0360.0190.0540.0170.014
      f3 dB/GHz47.148.048.348.048.548.648.348.648.6
      IL/dB0.220.440.660.430.861.290.641.281.92
    • Table 2. Performance comparison between graphene-based phase modulators.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Performance comparison between graphene-based phase modulators.

      DescriptionLength/μmf3 dB/GHzPower/(pJ/bit)Bias/VInsertion loss/dB
      Graphene on Si WG[17]75.6119.50.45211.37
      Graphene-Si on slot WG[24]100500NA1.30.97
      2-layer graphene in SOI[35]500300.387.80.6
      1-layer graphene in SOI[35]850190.666.52.805
      Graphene on ultrathin Si WG[36]96.6314.20.0973.871.55
      This work (2-layer GSNW)8047.11.0431.080.22
      This work (4-layer GSNW)8048.00.1811.080.43
      This work (6-layer GSNW)8048.30.0541.080.64
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Lanting Ji, Wei Chen, Yang Gao, Yan Xu, Chi Wu, Xibin Wang, Yunji Yi, Baohua Li, Xiaoqiang Sun, Daming Zhang. Low-power electro–optic phase modulator based on multilayer graphene/silicon nitride waveguide[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(8):

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Received: Feb. 13, 2020

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Apr. 29, 2021

    The Author Email: Sun Xiaoqiang (sunxq@jlu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/ab943b

    Topics