Study on Establishment of Near-Infrared Quantitative Model for Salvianolic Acid B in Naoxintong Capsule Based on the System Modeling Idea

Rui-lin GAO; Peng-shuo YANG; Gang XU; Xiao-wen WU; Chang YANG; Xin-yuan SHI

doi:10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2020)11-3573-06

Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, Volume. 40, Issue 11, 3573(2020)

Study on Establishment of Near-Infrared Quantitative Model for Salvianolic Acid B in Naoxintong Capsule Based on the System Modeling Idea

Rui-lin GAO1...1,*, Peng-shuo YANG1,1, Gang XU1,1, Xiao-wen WU1,1, Chang YANG1,1, and Xin-yuan SHI11 |Show fewer author(s)

Author Affiliations

¹[in Chinese]

¹1. School of Chinese Pharmacy, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(6)

Fig. 1. The chromatograms of salvianolic acid B reference standard (a) and sample solution (b)
1: Salvianolic acid B

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 2. The raw spectra of Salvia miltiorrhiza samples

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 3. Correlation between the prediction and reference values of salvianolic acid B

Download full size

View in Article

Table 1. Experimental factor levels and response variables for the D-optimal design
View table
View in Article
Table 1. Experimental factor levels and response variables for the D-optimal design
Variable Type Levels
X₁ K-S Continuous 1:1 4:1
X₂ LVs Discrete 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X₃ P Nominal Raw 2D MSC SNV SG9 2D-snv
X₄ V Nominal siPLS iPLS mwPLS Full
Response variables $R_{cal}^{2}$ RMSEC $R_{pre}^{2}$ RMSEP RPD

Table 2. Experimental results of D-optimal design

View table

View in Article

Table 2. Experimental results of D-optimal design

run	X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	$R_{cal}^{2}$	RMSEC	$R_{pre}^{2}$	RMSEP	RPD
1	1.45	1	2D-snv	sipls	0.176 8	0.016 0	0.080 1	0.017 0	0.944 4
2	3.10	7	SG9	full	0.983 0	0.002 9	0.990 0	0.002 4	6.823 7
3	4.00	10	2D	sipls	0.994 1	0.001 8	0.998 7	0.003 2	5.239 6
4	2.58	5	MSC	mwpls	0.986 3	0.002 7	0.987 7	0.003 3	4.905 4
5	1.66	8	RAW	ipls	0.980 4	0.003 3	0.969 4	0.004 3	3.937 4
6	1.00	1	SG9	full	0.647 8	0.017 9	0.460 0	0.015 6	1.126 2
7	3.50	9	MSC	full	0.993 4	0.001 9	0.995 1	0.001 7	9.868 5
8	2.56	6	2D-snv	full	0.992 2	0.002 0	0.993 2	0.002 1	7.467 3
9	3.33	3	MSC	ipls	0.966 2	0.004 2	0.990 2	0.002 3	7.075 0
10	3.92	8	2D	mwpls	0.981 3	0.003 1	0.995 6	0.003 0	5.478 0
11	1.00	1	SNV	sipls	0.259 4	0.017 8	0.309 7	0.014 7	1.229 3
12	4.00	2	2D-snv	ipls	0.831 5	0.008 8	0.865 3	0.009 2	1.753 3
13	1.00	1	2D	mwpls	0.322 9	0.016 8	0.441 5	0.016 8	0.993 8
14	3.10	7	SG9	full	0.983 0	0.002 9	0.990 0	0.002 4	6.823 7
15	1.00	10	MSC	ipls	0.988 7	0.002 7	0.958 0	0.004 4	4.137 8
16	2.50	6	2D-snv	mwpls	0.986 0	0.002 6	0.991 0	0.002 4	6.596 6
17	1.08	2	SNV	ipls	0.469 2	0.015 6	0.429 0	0.013 3	1.356 9
18	2.81	1	SNV	mwpls	0.220 0	0.016 2	0.104 9	0.016 5	0.998 6
19	2.47	5	SG9	ipls	0.982 5	0.003 0	0.961 5	0.004 8	3.365 0
20	1.00	9	RAW	full	0.994 0	0.001 9	0.982 3	0.003 0	5.798 0
21	2.37	5	SG9	sipls	0.946 2	0.005 3	0.943 6	0.006 1	2.722 3
22	4.00	5	SNV	full	0.976 6	0.003 5	0.988 0	0.002 7	6.167 0
23	2.26	9	2D	mwpls	0.981 9	0.003 1	0.992 6	0.003 0	5.499 7
24	2.71	2	2D	sipls	0.776 4	0.010 2	0.830 0	0.009 7	1.694 9
25	1.23	2	MSC	full	0.714 4	0.012 0	0.732 5	0.010 5	1.668 6
26	2.47	5	SG9	ipls	0.982 5	0.003 0	0.961 5	0.004 8	3.365 0
27	3.85	10	2D-snv	sipls	0.996 0	0.001 4	0.995 3	0.002 4	6.605 1
28	4.00	1	2D	mwpls	0.334 9	0.016 8	0.782 7	0.016 7	0.987 3
29	4.00	1	RAW	ipls	0.368 0	0.016 5	0.382 4	0.018 0	0.899 4
30	1.08	9	2D-snv	ipls	0.941 3	0.005 6	0.956 6	0.005 0	3.332 7
31	2.42	6	2D	full	0.990 0	0.001 9	0.992 8	0.002 1	7.880 1
32	1.65	4	2D-snv	ipls	0.881 1	0.007 4	0.939 2	0.006 0	2.665 0
33	2.50	6	2D	ipls	0.974 8	0.003 6	0.988 7	0.003 4	4.804 2
34	3.66	9	SNV	ipls	0.982 7	0.003 0	0.985 2	0.002 9	5.761 3
35	3.45	8	SNV	sipls	0.992 6	0.002 0	0.992 6	0.002 2	7.628 7
36	4.00	1	MSC	sipls	0.126 0	0.016 2	0.033 1	0.016 9	0.966 1
37	3.22	1	RAW	full	0.573 0	0.016 4	0.504 3	0.018 0	0.900 0
38	1.23	3	SNV	full	0.945 4	0.005 6	0.948 9	0.004 8	3.659 8
39	1.68	2	RAW	sipls	0.356 1	0.015 6	0.360 8	0.014 8	1.140 1
40	1.00	10	RAW	mwpls	0.993 8	0.001 9	0.965 6	0.004 2	4.217 6
41	1.00	8	SNV	mwpls	0.993 7	0.002 0	0.961 3	0.004 5	4.017 4
42	1.52	7	MSC	sipls	0.978 7	0.003 5	0.989 7	0.002 8	6.111 6
43	3.63	10	RAW	sipls	0.991 7	0.002 1	0.992 9	0.001 9	8.640 9
44	3.71	1	SG9	mwpls	0.372 9	0.016 5	0.388 8	0.017 8	0.915 5
45	1.00	10	2D	sipls	0.996 8	0.001 3	0.986 6	0.003 2	5.201 0
46	2.37	5	SG9	sipls	0.946 2	0.005 3	0.943 6	0.006 1	2.722 3
47	1.08	8	SG9	mwpls	0.984 8	0.003 0	0.967 8	0.004 0	4.416 5
48	2.02	10	2D-snv	sipls	0.996 7	0.001 3	0.993 3	0.002 9	5.368 7
49	2.27	7	RAW	sipls	0.975 0	0.003 6	0.988 5	0.002 5	6.652 9
50	3.15	10	SNV	full	0.994 3	0.001 7	0.994 5	0.001 8	8.978 0
51	1.89	1	2D	ipls	0.278 3	0.016 0	0.526 4	0.018 0	0.877 9
52	4.00	5	RAW	mwpls	0.982 3	0.003 0	0.956 2	0.004 9	3.329 1
53	2.71	2	2D	sipls	0.776 4	0.010 2	0.830 0	0.009 7	1.694 9
54	2.42	6	2D	full	0.990 0	0.001 9	0.992 8	0.002 1	7.880 1
55	4.00	10	SG9	mwpls	0.985 1	0.002 8	0.969 4	0.004 1	3.925 8

Table 3. Model fitting and analysis results

View table

View in Article

Table 3. Model fitting and analysis results

响应值	模型	P值	R²	$R_{Adj}^{2}$
Y₁	二次模型	<0.000 1	0.995 8	0.977 4
Y₂	二次模型	<0.000 1	0.999 0	0.994 9
Y₃	二次模型	<0.000 1	0.994 7	0.971 5
Y₄	二次模型	<0.000 1	0.998 7	0.993 2
Y₅	二次模型	<0.000 1	0.990 6	0.949 0

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Rui-lin GAO, Peng-shuo YANG, Gang XU, Xiao-wen WU, Chang YANG, Xin-yuan SHI. Study on Establishment of Near-Infrared Quantitative Model for Salvianolic Acid B in Naoxintong Capsule Based on the System Modeling Idea[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2020, 40(11): 3573

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites