Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution protocol with phase post-selection

Cong Jiang; Xiao-Long Hu; Zong-Wen Yu; Xiang-Bin Wang

doi:10.1364/PRJ.445617

Photonics Research, Volume. 10, Issue 7, 1703(2022)

Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution protocol with phase post-selection

Cong Jiang^1,2, Xiao-Long Hu³, Zong-Wen Yu⁴, and Xiang-Bin Wang^{1,2,5,6,7、*}

Author Affiliations

¹Jinan Institute of Quantum Technology, Jinan 250101, China

²State Key Laboratory of Low Dimensional Quantum Physics, Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

³School of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Materials and Technologies, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

⁴Data Communication Science and Technology Research Institute, Beijing 100191, China

⁵Shanghai Branch, CAS Center for Excellence and Synergetic Innovation Center in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Shanghai 201315, China

⁶Shenzhen Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering, and Physics Department, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China

⁷Frontier Science Center for Quantum Information, Beijing, China

show less

Figures & Tables(7)

Fig. 1. Comparison of the key rates with this work and the former methods under the symmetric channel. The line of Ref. [38] is the key rates of the double-scanning four-intensity MDI-QKD protocol, and the line of Ref. [29] is the key rates of the original four-intensity MDI-QKD protocol. The experiment parameters are listed in Table 1.

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 2. Comparison of the key rates with this work and the former methods under the symmetric channels. The experiment parameters here are similar to those in Fig. 1 except that we set N=109 and the misalignment-error probability ed=0.005.

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 3. Comparison of the key rates with this work and the former methods under the asymmetric channels. The experiment parameters are listed in Table 1, and we set LAC−LBC=20 km.

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 4. Comparison of the key rates with this work and the former methods under the asymmetric channels. The experiment parameters here are similar to those in Fig. 3 except that we set N=109 and the misalignment-error probability ed=0.005.

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 5. Bell measurement setup of Charlie [21]. Here we take the polarization-encoding as an example to show the simulation method and the results of the phase-encoding are the same. BS, 50:50 beam splitter; PBS, polarization beam splitter; D1H,D1V,D2H,D2V, single-photon detectors.

Download full size

View in Article

Table 1. List of Experimental Parameters Used in Numerical Simulations^a
View table
View in Article
Table 1. List of Experimental Parameters Used in Numerical Simulations^a
$p_{d}$ $e_{d}$ $η_{d}$ $f$ $α_{f}$ $ξ$ $N$
$1.0 \times 10^{- 7}$ 1.5% 40.0% 1.1 0.2 $1.0 \times 10^{- 10}$ $1.0 \times 10^{10}$

Table 2. Key Rates of Some Points in Fig. 1
View table
View in Article
Table 2. Key Rates of Some Points in Fig. 1
Methods 30 km 60 km 90 km 100 km
This work $2.24 \times 10^{- 4}$ $2.33 \times 10^{- 5}$ $1.28 \times 10^{- 6}$ $3.13 \times 10^{- 7}$
Ref. [38] $1.64 \times 10^{- 4}$ $1.55 \times 10^{- 5}$ $7.01 \times 10^{- 7}$ $1.29 \times 10^{- 7}$
Ref. [29] $1.33 \times 10^{- 4}$ $9.99 \times 10^{- 6}$ $2.17 \times 10^{- 7}$ 0

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Cong Jiang, Xiao-Long Hu, Zong-Wen Yu, Xiang-Bin Wang. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution protocol with phase post-selection[J]. Photonics Research, 2022, 10(7): 1703

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites