Laser Journal, Volume. 45, Issue 7, 124(2024)

Hologram quality assessment base on holographic plane and object plane

LU Yifan1... JIANG Zhidi2 and YU Mei1,* |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Faculty of Information Science and Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo Zhejiang 315211, China
  • 2College of Science and Technology Ningbo University, Ningbo Zhejiang 315300, China
  • show less
    References(14)

    [1] [1] Guerra R, Fonseca E, Pinheiro A, et al. Holography challenges on coding and quality assessment[C]//2022 10th European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP). IEEE, 2022: 1-6.

    [3] [3] Amirpour H, Pinheiro A M G, Fonseca E, et al. Quality evaluation of holographic images coded with standard codecs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2021, 24: 3256-3264.

    [4] [4] Ahar A, Blinder D, Bruylants T, et al. Subjective quality assessment of numerically reconstructed compressed holograms[C]//Applications of Digital Image Processing XXX-VIII. SPIE, 2015, 9599: 188-202.

    [5] [5] Amirpour H, Pinheiro A, Fonseca E, et al. Quality evaluation of digital holographic data encoded on the object plane using state of the art codecs[C]//2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2020: 3453-3457.

    [6] [6] Pinheiro A M G, Prazeres J, Gilles A, et al. Definition of Common Test Conditions for the new JPEG Pleno holography standard[C]//Optics, Photonics and Digital Technologies for Imaging Applications VII. SPIE, 2022, 12138: 157-171.

    [7] [7] Prazeres J, Gilles A, Muhammad R K, et al. Quality evaluation of the JPEG Pleno holography call for proposals response[C]//2022 14th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, 2022: 1-6.

    [8] [8] Schelkens P, Ahar A, Gilles A, et al. Compression strategies for digital holograms in biomedical and multimedia applications[J]. Light: Advanced Manufacturing, 2022, 3(3): 601-621.

    [9] [9] Ahar A, Birnbaum T, Chlipala M, et al. Comprehensive performance analysis of objective quality metrics for digital holography[J]. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2021, 97: 116361.

    [10] [10] Ahar A, Pereira M, Birnbaum T, et al. Validation of dynamic subjective quality assessment methodology for holographic coding solutions[C]//2021 13th International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, 2021: 7-12.

    [11] [11] Ahar A, Chlipala M, Birnbaum T, et al. Suitability analysis of holographic vs light field and 2D displays for subjective quality assessment of fourier holograms[J]. Optics Express, 2020, 28(24): 37069-37091.

    [13] [13] Domonkos V. Saliency-guided local full-reference image quality assessment[J]. Signals, 2022, 3(3): 483-496.

    [14] [14] Jalalinejad H, Tavakoli A, Zarmehi F. A simple and flexible modification of Grnwald-Letnikov fractional derivative in image processing[J]. Mathematical Sciences, 2018, 12(3): 205-210.

    [15] [15] Ahar A, Barri A, Schelkens P. From sparse coding significance to perceptual quality: A new approach for image quality assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2017, 27(2): 879-893.

    [16] [16] Ahar A, Birnbaum T, Blinder D, et al. Performance evaluation of sparseness significance ranking measure (SSRM) on holographic content[C]//3D Image Acquisition and Display: Technology, Perception and Applications. 2018.

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    LU Yifan, JIANG Zhidi, YU Mei. Hologram quality assessment base on holographic plane and object plane[J]. Laser Journal, 2024, 45(7): 124

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Feb. 4, 2024

    Accepted: Dec. 20, 2024

    Published Online: Dec. 20, 2024

    The Author Email: Mei YU (yumei@nbu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.14016/j.cnki.jgzz.2024.07.124

    Topics