Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 39, Issue 11, 1115001(2019)

Stereo Matching Algorithm Based on Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network

Yufeng Wang1,2, Hongwei Wang2,3、**, Guang Yu2, Mingquan Yang2, Yuwei Yuan4, and Jicheng Quan1,2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Naval Aviation University, Yantai, Shandong 264001, China
  • 2Aviation University of Air Force, Changchun, Jilin 130022, China
  • 3Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450001, China
  • 4The 91977 Troops, Beijing 102200, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(9)
    Architecture overview of proposed method
    Graphical depiction of sampling cost in disparity dimension. (a) S=1, C=1; (b) S=2, C=1; (c) S=2, C=4
    Disparity predicted by proposed method. (a) Left image; (b) disparity map; (c) error map; (d) local details
    • Table 1. Performance evaluation of proposed method with different S (C=1)

      View table

      Table 1. Performance evaluation of proposed method with different S (C=1)

      MethodSEEP /pixelED1 /%tRun /sGPU /GB
      PSMNet[14]11.09---
      11.023.410.752.16
      21.103.890.451.51
      31.164.340.351.32
      Proposed41.224.810.301.20
      51.305.250.251.09
      61.345.620.251.08
      71.416.070.221.01
      81.426.230.221.01
    • Table 2. Performance evaluation of proposed method with different C

      View table

      Table 2. Performance evaluation of proposed method with different C

      SCEEP /pixelED1 /%tRun /sGPU /GB
      111.023.410.752.16
      11.103.890.451.51
      21.073.710.481.68
      231.053.630.511.85
      41.083.810.532.02
      51.083.790.542.20
      61.073.690.562.37
      11.164.340.351.32
      21.134.060.371.42
      331.113.990.391.55
      41.144.060.411.66
      51.144.030.421.78
      61.093.890.431.89
    • Table 3. Performance evaluation of proposed method with different settings

      View table

      Table 3. Performance evaluation of proposed method with different settings

      SettingMax disparity of 192Max disparity of 384
      SCLossDimensionalityEEP /pixelED1 /%tRun /sGPU /GBEEP /pixelED1 /%
      11L1Tri1.023.410.752.161.333.64
      23L1Tri1.053.630.511.851.383.90
      23CEBi1.042.710.451.501.292.92
      23CE+L1Bi1.042.690.451.561.282.87
      33L1Tri1.113.990.391.551.494.30
      33CEBi1.132.730.361.301.393.40
      33CE+L1Bi1.122.750.361.281.373.00
    • Table 4. Performance evaluation of proposed method with different settings on K-val

      View table

      Table 4. Performance evaluation of proposed method with different settings on K-val

      SettingK15-valK12-val
      EEP /pixelED1 /%EEP /pixelED1 /%
      S10.742.230.622.05
      S20.752.020.631.78
      S30.812.230.701.98
    • Table 5. Performance evaluation of different methods on K15-test

      View table

      Table 5. Performance evaluation of different methods on K15-test

      MethodAllNoctRun /s
      ED1-bg /%ED1-fg /%ED1-all /%ED1-bg /%ED1-fg /%ED1-all /%
      MC-CNN-arct[10]2.898.883.892.487.643.3367.00
      DispNetC[11]4.324.414.344.113.724.050.06
      iResNet-i2[12]2.253.402.442.072.762.190.12
      GC-net[13]2.216.162.872.025.582.610.90
      PSMNet[14]1.864.622.321.714.312.140.41
      Proposed1.724.192.131.513.571.850.39
    • Table 6. Performance evaluation of different methods on K12-test

      View table

      Table 6. Performance evaluation of different methods on K12-test

      Methodγ2 /%γ3 /%γ5 /%Mean EEP /pixel
      NocAllNocAllNocAllNocAll
      MC-CNN-arct[10]3.905.452.433.631.642.390.70.9
      DispNetC[11]7.388.114.114.652.052.390.91.0
      iResNet-i2[12]2.693.341.712.161.061.320.50.6
      GC-net[13]2.713.461.772.301.121.460.60.7
      PSMNet[14]2.443.011.491.890.901.150.50.6
      Proposed2.353.041.421.900.891.190.60.6
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yufeng Wang, Hongwei Wang, Guang Yu, Mingquan Yang, Yuwei Yuan, Jicheng Quan. Stereo Matching Algorithm Based on Three-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(11): 1115001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Machine Vision

    Received: May. 5, 2019

    Accepted: Jul. 8, 2019

    Published Online: Nov. 6, 2019

    The Author Email: Wang Hongwei (alex19820911@126.com), Quan Jicheng (jicheng_quan@126.com)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS201939.1115001

    Topics