Optics and Precision Engineering, Volume. 30, Issue 1, 96(2022)

Low false alarm infrared target detection in airborne complex scenes

Dezhen YANG1...2, Songlin YU1,*, Jinjun FENG2, Jiangyong LI1 and Lihe WANG1 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1North China Research Institute of Electro-optics, Beijing0005, China
  • 2Beijing Vacuum Electronics Research Institute, Beijing100015, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    Target detection effect of traditional algorithm
    Comparison of gray distribution of dim small target and common false alarm sources
    Algorithm flowchart of infrared dim small target detection
    Comparison of frame skipping difference with other algorithms
    Preprocessing results of key modules of algorithm
    Comparison of algorithm results based on infrared small target open source images
    An example of airborne visual infrared high false alarm sequence set
    Comparison of detection rates of different algorithms
    Comparison of false alarm rates of different algorithms
    • Table 1. Complex background airborne infrared data set

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Complex background airborne infrared data set

      数据帧数波段

      背景

      (平均SCR)

      目标类型

      速高比/

      (rad·s-1

      特征与挑战

      序列1

      序列2

      45M

      60M

      长波

      双波段

      村庄 (2.31)

      空地 (2.75)

      地目标(5×5像素)

      空目标(12×12像素)

      0.05

      0.03

      地面亮斑多/干扰目标多

      空地交接/场景变化大/亮斑多

      序列390M双波段城镇 (1.72)空小目标(5×5像素)0.09亮目标暗目标转换/地面辐射源多
      序列415M长波城郊 (1.96)空目标(1×2~15×15像素)0.04~0.08大机动/目标尺寸、姿态变化大
      序列590M双波段云层 (2.72)空小目标(2×2像素)0.04太阳光直射干扰/复杂云层边缘
      序列690M中波云层 (3.57)空多目标(3×3像素)0.02~0.06快速搜索/云层背景变化大
    • Table 2. Comparison of BSF of different algorithms

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Comparison of BSF of different algorithms

      方 法序列1序列2序列3序列4序列5序列6
      Top-Hat12.8895.46435.45427.62475.8263.84
      IPI15.19214.8858.7669.46619.67219.572
      LCM0.9511.0032.8420.85318.97819.933
      GST16.36411.8644.6218.02233.05143.554
      PC-DM167.47195.03153.6921.77833.69230.778
      Proposed algorithm187.88202.46184.45197.6275.8233.415
    • Table 3. Comparison of SCRg of different algorithms

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison of SCRg of different algorithms

      方 法序列1序列2序列3序列4序列5序列6
      Top-Hat1.2501.4692.7511.1423.1714.871
      IPI1.4714.1894.0952.8283.7792.379
      LCM0.2530.6220.8460.1686.4577.327
      GST1.2882.1911.7561.6409.69212.554
      PC-DM12.28212.54916.6344.6425.1310.977
      Proposed algorithm14.08013.98818.42227.79613.9675.739
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Dezhen YANG, Songlin YU, Jinjun FENG, Jiangyong LI, Lihe WANG. Low false alarm infrared target detection in airborne complex scenes[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2022, 30(1): 96

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Information Sciences

    Received: Apr. 30, 2021

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jan. 20, 2022

    The Author Email: YU Songlin (yusir8511@sina.com)

    DOI:10.37188/OPE.20223001.0096

    Topics