Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, Volume. 19, Issue 6, 646(2024)

Estimation of near-surface ozone concentrations in China from 2001 to 2020

HUANG Kai1,2、*, LUO Wenhui1,2, WAN Cheng1,2, GONG Mingyan3, and MA Jinji1,2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, China
  • 2Engineering Technology Research Center of Resources Environment and GIS, Anhui Province, Wuhu 241002, China
  • 3School of Physics and Electronic Information, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    Distribution of ozone monitoring stations and TOAR stations in China
    Schematic diagram of grid matching
    Validation of ozone model accuracy. (a) ET model's sample-based cross-validation accuracy; (b) ET-XGBoost model's sample-based cross-validation accuracy; (c) ET-XGBoost model's station-based cross-validation accuracy; (d) ET-XGBoost model's time-based cross-validation accuracy; (e) additional site verification accuracy
    Annual validation of ozone model performance
    Quarterly applicability accuracy validation of the ozone model. (a) Spring; (b) summer; (c) autumn; (d) winter
    Accuracy validation of the applicability of ozone model historical data
    Accuracy validation of regional scale applicability of ozone models. (a) Eastern; (b) central; (c ) western
    Comparison of ozone model estimates with site values. (a) Day scale; (b) monthly scale; (c) annual scale
    Average monthly MDA8 O3 values from 2001 to 2020. (a)–(l) From January to December
    Average monthly MDA8 O3 values in China and five urban agglomerations from 2001 to 2020
    Annual average MDA8 O3 values from 2001 to 2020. (a)–(t) From 2001 to 2020
    Average annual MDA8 O3 values in China and five urban agglomerations from 2001 to 2020
    Average annual MDA8 O3 values for 2001–2010 (a) and 2011–2020 (b), and the difference in MDA8 O3 for the first 10 years of the latter decade (c)
    • Table 1. Information table of influencing factors

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Information table of influencing factors

      DataTemporal resolutionHorizontal resolutionData source
      U10/(m·s-1)1 h0.1° × 0.1°

      ERA5 Dataset

      (https://climate.copernicus.eu)

      V10/(m·s-1)
      PRE/mm
      EVA/mm
      SSRD/(J·m-2)
      T2M/K
      RH/%1 h0.25° × 0.25°
      BLH/m
      O3 ratio/10-9
      AOD1 d1 km × 1 kmhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5652257
      DEM/m-

      NASA SRTM Digital Elevation Dataset

      (https://cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov)

      NDVI15 d

      MOD13A2 v6 Dataset

      (https://lpdaac.usgs.gov)

      POP1 a

      Landscan Dataset

      (https://landscan.ornl.gov/)

      NL/DNMa[23]
      LUC

      MCD12Q1.006 Dataset

      (https://lpdaac.usgs.gov)

      LON/(°)---
      LAT/(°)
      DOY/d
    • Table 2. Table of model performance comparison

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Table of model performance comparison

      ModelTraining data periodTemporal resolutionSpatial resolutionCV-R2CV-RMSEProducts time rangeStudy areaSources
      Iterative RF2014–2019Daily0.0625° × 0.0625°0.8418.42008–2019ChinaChen[27]
      Geo-LGB2019Daily0.1° × 0.1°0.91210.252019North ChinaChen[28]
      XGBoost2019Daily0.05° × 0.05°0.87112.82019ChinaZhao[13]
      STET2013–2020Daily0.1° × 0.1°0.8717.102013–2020ChinaWei[12]
      ET-XGBoost2013–2020Daily0.1° × 0.1°0.9510.742001–2020ChinaThis study
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Kai HUANG, Wenhui LUO, Cheng WAN, Mingyan GONG, Jinji MA. Estimation of near-surface ozone concentrations in China from 2001 to 2020[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2024, 19(6): 646

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Mar. 27, 2023

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jan. 8, 2025

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2024.06.004

    Topics