Acta Physica Sinica, Volume. 68, Issue 3, 030201-1(2019)
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram for tetrahedral element and edge numbers.四面体单元及其棱边编号示意图
Fig. 4. Comparisons of modelling results of quadratic interpolation and analytical solutions based on total fields and secondary fields: (a) Apparent resistivity
; (b) phase
.
基于总场和二次场的二次插值的模拟结果与解析解的对比
Fig. 5. COMMEMI-3D1 model. The dashed lines in (a) are the
Fig. 10. Ellipsoidal model: (a)
Fig. 11. Slices of modelling results for ellipse model: (a) XY-mode apparent resistivities; (b) YX-mode apparent resistivities; (c) XY-mode phase; (d) YX-mode phase.椭球体模型模拟结果切片图 (a) XY模式视电阻率; (b) YX模式视电阻率; (c) XY模式相位; (d) YX模式相位
Fig. 13. Comparisions of three-dimensional and two-dimensional modelling results.三维和二维模拟结果对比
Fig. 14. Peak model and discretization using unstructured grids (the points in left diagram are survey line).山峰模型及其非结构化网格剖分(左图点为测线)
Fig. 15. Comparisions of three-dimensional and two-dimensional modelling results: (a), (b) Peak model; (c), (d) valley model.三维和二维模拟结果对比 (a), (b)山峰模型; (c), (d)山谷模型
Fig. 16. Comparisons of modelling results for different magnetic permeability: (a), (b) Model without electrical anomaly; (c), (d) model with electrical anomaly.不同磁导率模拟结果对比 (a), (b)无电性异常模型; (c), (d)含电性异常模型
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Zhi-Xuan Li, Ming-Xin Yue, Guan-Qun Zhou.
Category:
Received: Aug. 21, 2018
Accepted: --
Published Online: Oct. 28, 2019
The Author Email: