Contribution of Different Lighting Environments to Sound-Light Fusion Effects

Environment		Fear	Sadness	Soothing	Happiness	Heroism
Music	major	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
Music	minor	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
Lighting	red	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
	green	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
	blue	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
	white （3000 K）	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5
	white （6000 K）	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5	1-2-3-4-5

Table 2. ANOVA results under different music and lighting environments
View table
Table 2. ANOVA results under different music and lighting environments
Variable Sum of squares Degree of freedom Mean square F Significant difference
Valence 52.796 6 8.799 7.419 0.000^***
Arousal 24.171 6 4.029 3.344 0.004^**

Table 3. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under different auditory conditions

View table

Table 3. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under different auditory conditions

Physiological parameter	Environment variable	Mean	T	Degree of freedom	Significant difference
HR	major	4.35	4.992	19	0.000^***
HR	minor	4.00	5.627	19	0.000^***
RESP	major	1.75	6.723	19	0.000^***
RESP	minor	2.00	3.183	19	0.005^**
EDA	major	2.31	4.188	19	0.000^***
EDA	minor	1.61	3.672	19	0.002^**

Table 4. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under different visual conditions

View table

Table 4. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under different visual conditions

Physiological parameter	Environment variable	Mean	T	Degree of freedom	Significant difference
HR	red	2.55	6.831	19	0.000^***
	green	2.90	5.966	19	0.000^***
	blue	3.70	5.230	19	0.000^***
	white （6000 K）	3.20	4.272	19	0.000^***
	white （3000 K）	4.05	3.803	19	0.001^**
RESP	red	-0.30	-0.468	19	0.645
	green	1.40	1.945	19	0.067
	blue	1.15	1.769	19	0.093
	white （6000 K）	2.00	2.538	19	0.020^*
	white （3000 K）	-0.88	-1.131	19	0.272
EDA	red	1.66	4.248	19	0.000^***
	green	1.30	4.299	19	0.000^***
	blue	1.45	3.676	19	0.002^**
	white （6000 K）	1.50	3.917	19	0.001^**
	white （3000 K）	1.86	4.134	19	0.001^**

Table 5. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under dual-factor stimulation

View table

Table 5. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under dual-factor stimulation

Physiological parameter	Environment variable	Mean	T	Degree of freedom	Significant difference
HR	major+red	3.80	3.930	19	0.001^**
	major+green	4.30	4.729	19	0.000^***
	major+blue	4.85	5.585	19	0.000^***
	major+white （6000 K）	4.55	7.418	19	0.000^***
	major+white （3000 K）	3.05	4.686	19	0.000^***
	minor+red	2.85	5.284	19	0.000^***
	minor+green	4.50	5.142	19	0.000^***
	minor+blue	2.80	6.057	19	0.000^***
	minor+white （6000 K）	4.50	4.974	19	0.000^***
	minor+white （3000 K）	5.00	5.398	19	0.000^***
RESP	major+red	3.70	2.563	19	0.019^*
	major+green	1.70	2.138	19	0.046^*
	major+blue	-0.15	-0.178	19	0.860
	major+white （6000 K）	0.30	0.188	19	0.853
	major+white （3000 K）	0.65	0.933	19	0.363
	minor+red	2.40	4.366	19	0.000^***
	minor+green	2.10	2.666	19	0.015^*
	minor+blue	2.05	2.523	19	0.021^*
	minor+white （6000 K）	0.95	2.111	19	0.048^*
	minor+white （3000 K）	1.75	6.723	19	0.000^***
EDA	major+red	1.46	3.547	19	0.002^**
	major+green	1.33	3.550	19	0.002^**
	major+blue	1.05	3.215	19	0.005^**
	major+white （6000 K）	1.59	3.962	19	0.000^***
	major+white （3000 K）	1.25	3.559	19	0.002^**
	minor+red	0.61	2.976	19	0.008^**
	minor+green	0.87	2.630	19	0.017^*
	minor+blue	1.01	3.303	19	0.004^**
	minor+white （6000 K）	0.71	2.660	19	0.015^*
	minor+white （3000 K）	1.43	3.332	19	0.004^**

Table 6. Comparison of physiological parameters between light and two-factor environmental stimulus

View table

Table 6. Comparison of physiological parameters between light and two-factor environmental stimulus

Physiological parameter	Single-factor environment variable	Dual-factor environment variable	Mean	T	Degree of freedom	Significant difference
HR	blue	minor+blue	-2.40	-2.239	19	0.037^*
EDA	white （6000 K）	major+white （6000 K）	-0.91	-2.535	19	0.020^*
	red	minor+red	1.05	3.095	19	0.006^**
	white （6000 K）	minor+white （6000 K）	0.79	2.381	19	0.028^*

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Jiaqi Ju, Ke Xu, Yue Wang, Jukun Liu, Yan Jin. Contribution of Different Lighting Environments to Sound-Light Fusion Effects[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2022, 59(7): 0733003

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Vision, Color, and Visual Optics

Received: Jun. 23, 2021

Accepted: Aug. 5, 2021

Published Online: Apr. 11, 2022

The Author Email: Yan Jin (jinyan2467@163.com)

DOI:10.3788/LOP202259.0733003

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Record sheet of the subjective emotions

Table 1. Record sheet of the subjective emotions

Table 2. ANOVA results under different music and lighting environments

Table 2. ANOVA results under different music and lighting environments

Table 3. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under different auditory conditions

Table 3. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under different auditory conditions

Table 4. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under different visual conditions

Table 4. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under different visual conditions

Table 5. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under dual-factor stimulation

Table 5. Statistical analysis results of physiological parameters under dual-factor stimulation

Table 6. Comparison of physiological parameters between light and two-factor environmental stimulus

Table 6. Comparison of physiological parameters between light and two-factor environmental stimulus