Chinese Optics Letters, Volume. 21, Issue 4, 042702(2023)

Satellite-to-aircraft quantum key distribution performance estimation with boundary layer effects

Huicun Yu1,2, Bangying Tang3, Jiahao Li1, Yuexiang Cao1, Han Zhou3, Sichen Li3, Haoxi Xiong4, Bo Liu2、*, and Lei Shi1、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1Information and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710077, China
  • 2College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
  • 3College of Computer and Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
  • 4Teaching and Research Support Center, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    Schematic diagram of satellite and aircraft in the WGS-84 coordinate system.
    Schematic diagram of downlink satellite-to-aircraft QKD in the spherical coordinate system based on the aircraft. The satellite (Alice) flies in a certain orbit above the receiving aircraft (Bob).
    Schematic diagram of the distance between the BL and receiver telescope.
    Diagram of the satellite-to-aircraft QKD performance evaluation.
    Schematic diagram of photon aberrations evaluation. The photons propagate through the BL to the receiver telescope, and the wavefront aberration can be calculated by the ray-tracing method.
    Evaluated density field distribution of the DLR-F6 BL. The dimensions of the BL are 500 mm×500 mm×50 mm.
    Total loss over the different incident angles. Here they are α = 0°, 90°, 180°, 270°.
    Schematic diagram of satellite-to-aircraft QKD from 12:00 on May 29, 2022, to 12:00 on June 5, 2022. The yellow arrow indicates the direction of flight of the aircraft.
    (a) Total loss in the satellite-to-aircraft QKD scenario; (b) estimated QBER over the communication time; (c) secure key rate over the communication time. The value of X0 is 66 mm and the aircraft flights toward the south. The intensity of signal states is 0.8, and the intensity of decoy states is 0.1.
    (a) Total loss in the satellite-to-aircraft QKD scenario; (b) estimated QBER over the communication time; (c) secure key rate over the communication time. The value of X0 is 66 mm and the aircraft flights toward the east. The intensity of signal states is 0.8, and the intensity of decoy states is 0.1.
    • Table 1. Parameters of Airborne QKD

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Parameters of Airborne QKD

      PayloadParm.DescriptionValue
      AircraftvFlight speed0.7 Ma
      hBAltitude of aircraft10 km
      ρhAir density0.413 kg/m3
      τExtinction optical thickness[46]0.02
      Photon sourceDTDiameter of the transmitter telescope0.3 m
      δTTransmitter pointing precision[10]10 µrad
      λTransmitter wavelength1550 nm
      ω0Waist radius0.0949 m
      r0Fried parameter in zenith[44]0.4 m
      μIntensity of signal states0.8
      νIntensity of decoy states0.1
      NSystem repetition rate100 MHz
      PsProbability of signal states50%
      PdProbability of decoy states30%
      PvProbability of vacuum states25%
      Receiving moduleDRDiameter of the receiver telescope0.5 m
      edSystem detection error rate1%
      pdDark count rate2 × 10−6
      ηdDetector efficiency50%
      ηsReceiving optical module efficiency60%
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Huicun Yu, Bangying Tang, Jiahao Li, Yuexiang Cao, Han Zhou, Sichen Li, Haoxi Xiong, Bo Liu, Lei Shi. Satellite-to-aircraft quantum key distribution performance estimation with boundary layer effects[J]. Chinese Optics Letters, 2023, 21(4): 042702

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Quantum Optics and Quantum Information

    Received: Sep. 27, 2022

    Accepted: Dec. 6, 2022

    Posted: Dec. 6, 2022

    Published Online: Mar. 29, 2023

    The Author Email: Bo Liu (liubo08@nudt.edu.cn), Lei Shi (slfly2012@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/COL202321.042702

    Topics