Acta Photonica Sinica, Volume. 52, Issue 11, 1111002(2023)

Synthetic Aperture Imaging Lidar Tran-receiver Optical System Based on Microlens Array

Long GAO1,*... Xianjie LI1, Chao AN1, Zongyao OU1, Peisi WANG2, Ziqi SONG2, Yuliang TAO1 and Jin WU2 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Beijing Institute of Space Mechanics & Electricity,China Academy of Space Technology,Beijing 100094,China
  • 2Aerospace Information Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100094,China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Schematic of the bistatic lidar system
    Design of micro-lens array and fabrication
    Single mode fiber coupling efficiency for different field
    Effects of the single mode fiber coupling efficiency for different cases
    Sub-field diagram
    Measurement results of the coupling efficiency for the 4×4 fiber micro-lens array
    4×4 micro-lens array and output laser beam mode
    Spot of the focus surface for the transmitter and receiver
    • Table 1. Parameters of the fiber micro-lens array

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Parameters of the fiber micro-lens array

      No.Index nameParameters
      1Array size4×4
      2Wavelength1 520~1 620 nm
      3MaterialK-PG375
      4Transmittance ratio≥99.5%(1 550 nm±5 nm)
      5Micro-lens array size7 mm×7 mm
      6Focal length4.8 mm
      7Center thickness1 mm
      8Curvature2.53 mm
      9Conic coefficient-0.57
      10Effective aperture1.2 mm
      11Center space1.24 mm×1.24 mm
      12Alignment accuracy±0.001 mm
      13Surface flatnessλ/30(@632.8 nm)
      14Fiber typePMF
      15Mode field diameter10.5 μm
      16Number aperture0.125
      17Coupled efficiency≥70%
      18Uniformity±3°
      19Distribution accuracy±0.001 mm
      20Beam qualityGaussian mode
    • Table 2. Coupling efficiency of the different field of view

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Coupling efficiency of the different field of view

      No.Half field of view/(°)Efficiency
      100.813 291 499
      20.000 143 2390.812 361 066
      30.000 286 4790.809 572 275
      40.000 429 7180.804 893 894
      50.000 572 9580.798 404 888
      60.000 716 1970.790 100 782
      70.000 859 4370.780 012 488
      80.001 002 6760.768 093 323
      90.001 145 9160.754 564 001
      100.001 289 1550.739 416 596
      110.001 432 3940.722 734 353
      120.001 575 6340.704 483 210
      130.001 718 8730.685 027 978
      140.001 862 1130.664 368 936
      150.002 005 3520.642 637 232
      160.002 148 5920.619 808 799
      170.002 291 8310.596 342 261
      180.002 435 0710.572 223 412
      190.002 578 3100.547 591 409
      200.002 721 5500.522 405 366
      210.002 864 7890.497 145 235
    • Table 3. Calculation results of the coupling efficiency for the whole field of view

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Calculation results of the coupling efficiency for the whole field of view

      No.Field of view/μradAreaWeight ratioWeight ratio×efficiency
      101.963 5×10-110.002 50.002 033 229
      22.5×10-65.890 49×10-110.007 50.006 092 708
      35×10-69.817 48×10-110.012 50.010 119 653
      47.5×10-61.374 45×10-100.017 50.014 085 643
      51×10-51.767 15×10-100.022 50.017 964 11
      61.25×10-52.159 84×10-100.027 50.021 727 771
      71.5×10-52.552 54×10-100.032 50.025 350 406
      81.75×10-52.945 24×10-100.037 50.028 803 5
      92×10-53.337 94×10-100.042 50.032 068 97
      102.25×10-53.730 64×10-100.047 50.0351 222 88
      112.5×10-54.123 34×10-100.052 50.037 943 554
      122.75×10-54.516 04×10-100.057 50.040 507 785
      133×10-54.908 74×10-100.062 50.042 814 249
      143.25×10-55.301 44×10-100.067 50.044 844 903
      153.5×10-55.694 14×10-100.072 50.046 591 199
      163.75×10-56.086 84×10-100.077 50.048 035 182
      174×10-56.479 53×10-100.082 50.049 198 237
      184.25×10-56.872 23×10-100.087 50.050 069 549
      194.5×10-57.264 93×10-100.092 50.050 652 205
      204.75×10-57.657 63×10-100.097 50.050 934 523
    • Table 4. Test results of the coupling efficiency for the 4×4 fiber micro-lens array

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Test results of the coupling efficiency for the 4×4 fiber micro-lens array

      No.Output/mWInput/mWTransmittance ratioNo.Output/mWInput/mWTransmittance ratio
      11.1281.5672%91.1231.5672%
      21.12472%101.1473%
      31.14573%111.1473%
      41.1473%121.14173%
      51.12672%131.14774%
      61.14874%141.14774%
      71.15774%151.14974%
      81.14373%161.16375%
      Average transmittance73.1%
    • Table 5. Axis misalignment between the transmitter and receiver

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Axis misalignment between the transmitter and receiver

      ItemX/mmY/mmMisaligment/(″)
      Transmitter660
      Receiver channel 16.0966.2394.4
      Receiver channel 26.1486.0762.9
      Receiver channel 36.1435.9822.5
      Receiver channel 46.3025.8325.9
      Receiver channel 56.3016.1716.0
      Receiver channel 66.3485.9226.1
      Receiver channel 76.4545.9167.9
      Receiver channel 86.5475.8419.8
      Receiver channel 95.8936.1623.3
      Receiver channel 106.1895.913.6
      Receiver channel 116.3075.9165.5
      Receiver channel 126.3745.787.5
      Receiver channel 135.9196.0681.8
      Receiver channel 146.0015.8462.6
      Receiver channel 156.15.7654.4
      Receiver channel 165.9495.6875.5
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Long GAO, Xianjie LI, Chao AN, Zongyao OU, Peisi WANG, Ziqi SONG, Yuliang TAO, Jin WU. Synthetic Aperture Imaging Lidar Tran-receiver Optical System Based on Microlens Array[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2023, 52(11): 1111002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Mar. 6, 2023

    Accepted: May. 22, 2023

    Published Online: Dec. 22, 2023

    The Author Email: GAO Long (gaolongc508@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/gzxb20235211.1111002

    Topics