Journal of Geographical Sciences, Volume. 30, Issue 5, 843(2020)

Simulation on the stochastic evolution of hydraulic geometry relationships with the stochastic changing bankfull discharges in the Lower Yellow River

Xiaolong SONG1,2, Deyu ZHONG1、*, and Guangqian WANG1
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Hydro-science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Simulation and Safety, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(15)
    The Gaocun-Sunkou reach of the Lower Yellow River
    Comparison of the calculated and measured values of bankfull channel geometries in the Gaocun-Sunkou reach of the Lower Yellow River under the Model-1 condition
    Comparison of the calculated and measured values of bankfull channel geometries in the Gaocun-Sunkou reach of the Lower Yellow River under the Model-2 condition
    Comparison of the calculated and measured values of bankfull channel geometries in the Gaocun-Sunkou reach of the Lower Yellow River under the Model-3 condition
    The time-varying process of effective probabilistic stability thickness of hydraulic geometry in the Gaocun-Sunkou reach of the Lower Yellow River under the three model conditions
    Comparison of stochastic average with measurements in the Gaocun-Sunkou reach of the Lower Yellow River under the three model conditions
    The time-varying probability distribution of riverbed stability indices, hydraulic width/depth ratio and stream power in the Gaocun-Sunkou reach of the Lower Yellow River based on Fractional Jump-Diffusion model (13)
    • Table 1.

      Flood season’s average discharge, suspended sediment concentration, and annual measured bankfull channel geometries along the Gaocun station downwards

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1.

      Flood season’s average discharge, suspended sediment concentration, and annual measured bankfull channel geometries along the Gaocun station downwards

      YearFlood season’s average value (*)Bankfull discharge Q (m3/s)Slope S (‰)Width B (m)Depth D (m)Velocity U (m/s)
      DischargeQf (m3/s)IS coefficient $\xi_{f}$(kg·s/m6)
      19522417.0730.008067000.1207501.481.57
      19532562.9670.015358000.112487.52.581.25
      19543531.8620.013255000.1044503.171.13
      19553218.5930.009554000.142711.51.541.57
      19562673.7400.015454200.1216522.190.96
      19571838.9840.019753000.125620.82.200.95
      19584190.6260.012355000.124719.51.321.07
      19592070.8540.035667000.1266841.101.47
      19601092.7540.034365000.121325.51.020.90
      19612729.5930.006172000.1034452.371.84
      19622232.0330.007978000.1145811.781.20
      19632926.1060.006585000.1105841.301.00
      19644969.2680.005295000.1131217.51.691.62
      19651534.8780.012398000.1286141.241.69
      19662898.6420.017685000.1399671.241.34
      19674232.6830.009160000.125957.51.801.80
      19683114.8210.011060000.1261618.81.161.63
      19691155.350.037850000.1173901.871.54
      19701675.9760.035943000.12410671.351.28
      19711385.220.033643000.123922.51.211.36
      19721205.6670.022339000.121493.50.830.92
      19731938.8410.028235000.121566.61.090.47
      19741164.1510.027133700.121610.51.221.76
      19753035.6750.011547100.118553.51.681.31
      19763137.3250.008860900.1175421.471.59
      19771627.4720.041965000.121366.11.321.15
      19781949.7560.026255000.113404.52.231.12
      19791945.1220.019952000.108312.13.091.38
      19801183.4470.022545000.120483.51.301.61
      19813011.6180.011439000.114412.72.251.39
      19822226.9110.009459000.1235381.531.64
      19833310.4070.006373000.117583.72.271.58
      19843127.6670.007074000.118551.51.661.68
      19852298.6910.011076000.113527.52.921.54
      19861207.0650.013874000.115529.51.900.57
      1987694.13820.021668000.114233.11.780.89
      19881915.2150.024464000.110353.52.581.53
      19891796.5450.015646000.111376.52.151.49
      19901233.3980.021745000.111363.22.311.39
      1991429.7350.052344000.121453.51.240.90
      19921168.780.038332000.1214651.031.07
      19931285.7640.020736000.1154601.181.25
      19941221.4390.039437000.1194691.201.22
      19951013.0870.046530000.1224860.961.09
      19961357.5560.023228000.119537.51.271.48
      1997299.51250.158927500.126410.51.100.94
      19988990.036627000.1223980.951.10
      1999779.29270.046828000.1214741.071.13
      2000443.14630.016126000.121500.51.060.91
      2001321.32280.023224000.1214861.011.26
      2002714.44720.014820000.1204461.081.20
      20031300.4140.011323000.118448.51.260.84
      2004818.29260.023936000.1154391.340.90
      2005897.5360.010440000.1155281.381.17
      2006806.0080.007945000.115431.51.331.24
      20071140.6740.005947000.1124911.621.24
      2008625.0400.009548000.113347.51.551.40
      2009646.4550.004150000.1165151.211.03
      20101166.4220.004553000.118518.51.050.99
      2011934.0650.005154000.1196681.231.04
      20121438.4950.005754000.120648.51.241.04
      20131219.8940.007658000.118533.51.271.10
    • Table 2.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the SDEs-Eq.(8a)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the SDEs-Eq.(8a)

      EstimateKbc$ \beta$${{\sigma }_{1}}$$\gamma $
      Mean76.495-0.4770.2990.2130.1360.582
      SD23.8330.0440.0270.0180.0050.047
    • Table 3.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the SDEs-Eq.(8b)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the SDEs-Eq.(8b)

      EstimateSlope (S)Width (B)Depth (D)Velocity (U)
      mMean0.1840.7710.5600.424
      SD0.0380.2180.0920.068
      ${{\sigma }_{2}}$Mean0.0730.1430.2760.130
      SD0.1480.0470.0690.023
    • Table 4.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the jump-diffusion Eq. (10a)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the jump-diffusion Eq. (10a)

      EstimateKbc$\beta $${{\sigma }_{1}}$$\gamma $$\lambda _{u}^{[1]} $$\lambda _{d}^{[1]} $$1/\eta _{u}^{\left[ 1 \right]} $$1/\eta _{d}^{[1]} $
      Mean23.818-0.5050.4320.3120.1180.4940.0300.0200.2150.573
      SD4.7950.0250.0180.0020.0030.0030.0010.0040.0160.047
    • Table 5.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the jump-diffusion Eq. (10b)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the jump-diffusion Eq. (10b)

      EstimateSlope (S)Width (B)Depth (D)Velocity (U)
      mMean-0.0860.2640.3500.310
      SD0.0090.0430.0590.046
      ${{\sigma }_{2}}$Mean0.0750.3010.3000.160
      SD0.0140.0650.0650.055
      $\lambda _{u}^{[2]} $Mean0.1800.3000.3110.394
      SD0.0010.0140.0290.065
      $\lambda _{d}^{[2]} $Mean0.1800.3000.3270.426
      SD0.0040.0260.0540.025
      $1/\eta _{u}^{[2]} $Mean0.0590.0790.1800.080
      SD0.0010.0450.0250.004
      $1/\eta _{d}^{[2]} $Mean0.0300.1090.1750.177
      SD0.0090.0680.0270.062
    • Table 6.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the fractional jump-diffusion Eq. (13a)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the fractional jump-diffusion Eq. (13a)

      EstimateKbc$\beta $${{\sigma }_{1}}$$\gamma $${{H}^{[1]}} $$\lambda _{u}^{[1]} $$\lambda _{d}^{[1]} $$1/\eta _{u}^{\left[ 1 \right]} $$1/\eta _{d}^{[1]} $
      Mean25.14-0.520.420.290.110.230.550.090.060.040.15
      SD3.270.030.020.010.000.000.000.000.020.000.01
    • Table 7.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the fractional jump-diffusion Eq. (13b)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7.

      The estimated results of the unknown parameters set for the fractional jump-diffusion Eq. (13b)

      EstimateSlope (S)Width (B)Depth (D)Velocity (U)
      mMean-0.1410.7040.3500.880
      SD0.0110.0430.0260.063
      ${{\sigma }_{2}}$Mean0.0900.5000.6400.260
      SD0.0150.0350.0550.017
      ${{H}^{[2]}} $Mean0.4710.3490.4710.301
      SD0.0540.0130.0260.063
      $\lambda _{u}^{[2]} $Mean0.3740.4100.3610.554
      SD0.0720.0750.0260.064
      $\lambda _{d}^{[2]} $Mean0.3800.4100.3670.556
      SD0.0950.0750.0230.052
      $1/\eta _{u}^{[2]} $Mean0.0880.4880.3000.230
      SD0.0410.0480.0110.033
      $1/\eta _{d}^{[2]} $Mean0.0870.4530.1050.170
      SD0.0250.0640.0230.028
    • Table 8.

      The correlation coefficients of time-varying stochastic average Zw, $\zeta $,$\Omega $ with Q

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 8.

      The correlation coefficients of time-varying stochastic average Zw, $\zeta $,$\Omega $ with Q

      CorrelationZw$\zeta $$\Omega $Q
      Q0.0350.1400.5231
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiaolong SONG, Deyu ZHONG, Guangqian WANG. Simulation on the stochastic evolution of hydraulic geometry relationships with the stochastic changing bankfull discharges in the Lower Yellow River[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2020, 30(5): 843

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: Feb. 28, 2019

    Accepted: Sep. 12, 2019

    Published Online: Sep. 30, 2020

    The Author Email: ZHONG Deyu (zhongdy@tsinghua.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1007/s11442-020-1758-z

    Topics