Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 42, Issue 11, 1134024(2022)

CT Image Denoising with Non-Local Means Based on Feature Fusion

Chao Long1,2, Heng Jin1,3, Ling Li1,3, Jinyin Sheng1,3, and Liming Duan1,2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Engineering Research Center of Industrial Computed Tomography Nondestructive Testing, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • 2College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • 3College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Schematic diagram of NLM algorithm
    Flowchart of algorithm
    Gray level curves of Sheep-Logan head model under different similarity windows. (a) Sheep-Logan head model; (b) size of similarity window is 2×2, and size of search window is 5×5; (c) size of similarity window is 3×3, and size of search window is 7×7; (d) size of similarity window is 4×4, and size of search window is 9×9
    Denoising results and local magnification of Sheep-Logan head model under different noise. (a) Original image; (b) δ=5; (c) δ=10; (d) δ=15
    Gray contrast curves
    CT slices of sheep bone. (a) Original image; (b) local enlargement; (c) NLM; (d) ST-NLM; (e) proposed algorithm
    CT images of 168th slice of sheep bone. (a) Original image; (b) local enlargement; (c) NLM; (d) ST-NLM; (e) proposed algorithm
    CT images of 105th slice of rock sample and results of edge detection. (a) Original image; (b) local enlargement; (c) NLM; (d) ST-NLM; (e) proposed algorithm
    CT images of 179th slice of rock sample and edge detection results. (a) Original image; (b) local enlargement;(c) NLM; (d) ST-NLM; (e) proposed algorithm
    • Table 1. Comparison of evaluation indexes of simulation image

      View table

      Table 1. Comparison of evaluation indexes of simulation image

      δNoise in Fig. 4(a)SSIMof NLMSSIM of ST-NLMSSIM of proposed method
      50.42030.51930.53330.5593
      100.31140.48430.49610.525
      150.25270.47590.48180.5016
      δNoise in Fig. 4(a)PSNRof NLMPSNR of ST-NLMPSNR of proposed method
      524.011428.580530.150732.1923
      1019.311924.916826.777329.5706
      1516.823724.974325.946527.6429
    • Table 2. Main parameters of CT system

      View table

      Table 2. Main parameters of CT system

      ObjectCT systemX-ray energy /keVX-ray energy /μADetector size /mmExposure time /ms
      Bone of sheepPlaner array60400.2200
      StonePlaner array150650.21000
    • Table 3. Indexes of CT image sharpness

      View table

      Table 3. Indexes of CT image sharpness

      ImageEvaluation parameterSlice No.Sharpness
      NLMST-NLMThis paper
      12th76.781677.184482.3463
      Fig. 6Tenengrad function25th52.498553.326559.3399
      196th65.296466.415980.8070
      Fig. 7Tenengrad function168th25.560525.601828.4846
    • Table 4. Sharpness of CT image of rock sample

      View table

      Table 4. Sharpness of CT image of rock sample

      ImageEvaluation parameterSlice No.Sharpness
      NLMST-NLMThis paper
      Fig. 8Tenengrad function105th23.997524.005225.1846
      Fig. 9Tenengrad function179th26.651727.145728.7604
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Chao Long, Heng Jin, Ling Li, Jinyin Sheng, Liming Duan. CT Image Denoising with Non-Local Means Based on Feature Fusion[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(11): 1134024

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: X-Ray Optics

    Received: Jan. 17, 2022

    Accepted: Apr. 15, 2022

    Published Online: Jun. 3, 2022

    The Author Email: Duan Liming (duanliming163@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202242.1134024

    Topics