Acta Photonica Sinica, Volume. 53, Issue 12, 1222002(2024)

Design of Off-axis Three-mirror Optical System Based on Controlled Genetic Algorithm

Jiangtao WANG1...2,3, Hu WANG1,2,3,*, Zhanpeng MA1,3, Yaoke XUE1,2,3,4, Xingyan WANG1,2,3, and Jin LIAN1,23 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Space Optics Technology Lab,Xi′an Institute of Optics and Precision Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xi'an 710119,China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
  • 3Xi'an Space Sensor Optical Technology Engineering Research Center,Xi'an 710119,China
  • 4Youth Innovation Promotion Association,Beijing 100029,China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(19)
    The structure of one-axis three-mirror optical system
    Genetic algorithm solution system initial structure flow chart
    Schematic of controlled genetic algorithm
    Genetic algorithm iteration process
    Image quality analysis diagram of system initial structure
    Optimize the initial structure directly
    Distance constraint diagram of optical system
    Result layout
    System imaging quality
    System grid distortion diagram
    • Table 1. The relationship between parameters and structure of one-axis three-mirror optical system

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. The relationship between parameters and structure of one-axis three-mirror optical system

      α1α2β1β2Structural formAn image between the main and secondary mirrorsAn image between the secondary and tertiary mirrors
      >1>1<0>0Convex-convex-concaveNoNo
      >1>0,<1>0<0Convex-concave-concaveNoNo
      >1>-1,<0>0>0Convex-concave-concaveNoYes
      >0,<1>1>0>0Concave-convex-concaveNoNo
      >0,<1>0,<1<0<0Concave-convex-concaveNoNo
      >0,<1<-1<0>0Concave-convex-concaveNoYes
      >-1,<0>1<0>0Concave-convex-concaveYesNo
      <-1>1<0>0Concave-convex-concaveYesNo
    • Table 2. System parameter range

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. System parameter range

      Parameterα1α2β1β2C2C2C3
      Range1.2~61.2~6-0.99~-0.011.001~5-15~15-15~15-15~15
    • Table 3. Different weight optimization results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Different weight optimization results

      Weight[ω1-ω5Fitness functionRMS radius/μmGEO radius/μm
      [21111]0.3484.988.65
      [12111]0.03810.5717.97
      [11211]0.1577.6913.24
      [11121]0.0877.2412.56
      [11112]0.0037.9313.69
    • Table 4. System parameter

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. System parameter

      Parameterα1α2β1β2C2C2C3
      Outcome1.281.670.371.180.54-1.100.09
    • Table 5. System result parameter

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. System result parameter

      SurfaceSurface typeRadius/mmDistance/mmConic
      Primary mirrorFringe Zernike Polynomials6 000-279.58-6.18
      Secondary mirrorEven-order aspheric surface-425.38294.8615
      Tertiary mirrorEven-order aspheric surface-371.74297.990.17
    • Table 6. Primary mirror Zernike fringe polynomial coefficients

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Primary mirror Zernike fringe polynomial coefficients

      TermValueTermValue
      Z5-1.162 3×10-2Z17-1.519 9×10-2
      Z8-2.110 5×10-2Z206.477 9×10-3
      Z9-1.772 0×10-2Z211.969 1×10-3
      Z11-2.205 9×10-2Z24-4.353 8×10-4
      Z12-1.227 8×10-3Z25-2.496 5×10-5
      Z151.884 9×10-3Z271.776 7×10-5
      Z16-4.463 0×10-4
    • Table 7. System spot diagram

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7. System spot diagram

      Field of view(0°,19°)(15°,19°)(0°,25°)(15°,25°)
      Spot diagram
      RMS radius value /μm3.2022.9123.2703.535
      GEO radius value /μm5.8535.04611.4789.272
    • Table 8. System tolerance allocation

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 8. System tolerance allocation

      Tolerance typeIndex
      Radius of curvature ΔR/mm±0.02
      Quadratic coefficient Δk±0.1%
      Surface accuracy RMS(λ=632.8 nm)±1/50λ
      Lens thickness and air gap/mm±0.02
      X-direction eccentricity/mm±0.05
      Y-direction eccentricity/mm±0.05
      X-direction tilt/(°)±0.033
      Y-direction tilt/(°)±0.033
      Z-direction tilt/(°)±0.051
    • Table 9. System full field of view tolerance analysis RMS radius value

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 9. System full field of view tolerance analysis RMS radius value

      Probability

      distribution

      Each field of view RMS radius value
      (0°,5°)(15°,5°)(0°,12°)(15°,12°)(0°,19°)(15°,19°)(0°,25°)(15°,25°)
      90%0.010 00.009 60.009 10.009 40.009 90.009 80.016 40.022 1
      80%0.009 20.008 70.008 10.008 70.008 70.009 00.014 70.019 9
      50%0.007 40.069 00.006 50.006 80.006 90.006 80.010 40.015 9
      20%0.005 00.005 50.005 10.005 20.005 30.004 80.007 40.012 1
      10%0.004 60.004 40.004 60.004 70.004 20.004 20.006 10.010 4
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jiangtao WANG, Hu WANG, Zhanpeng MA, Yaoke XUE, Xingyan WANG, Jin LIAN. Design of Off-axis Three-mirror Optical System Based on Controlled Genetic Algorithm[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2024, 53(12): 1222002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Optical Design and Fabrication

    Received: May. 30, 2024

    Accepted: Aug. 16, 2024

    Published Online: Jan. 15, 2025

    The Author Email: WANG Hu (wanghu@opt.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/gzxb20245312.1222002

    Topics