[2] [2] COLLE S, THOMAS D, VANDERSCHUREN J. Process simulation of sulphur dioxide abatement with hydrogen peroxide solutions in a packed column［J］. Chem Eng Res Des, 2005, 83(1): 81-87.

[11] [11] CHHANA A, LEE G, DALBETH N. Factors influencing the crystallization of monosodium urate: a systematic literature review［J］. BMC Musculoskel Dis, 2015, 16(1): 121-133.

[12] [12] AL-JIBBOURI S, STREGE C, ULRICH J. Crystallization kinetics of epsomite influenced by pH-value and impurities［J］. J Cryst Growth, 2002, 236(1): 400-406.

[14] [14] KUBOTA N. A new interpretation of metastable zone widths measured for unseeded solutions［J］. J Cryst Growth, 2008, 310(3): 629-634.

[17] [17] ULRICH C S. Morphology prediction of crystals grown in the presence of impurities and solvents: an evaluation of the state of the art ［J］. J Cryst Growth, 2012, 353(1): 168-173.

[23] [23] RAYMOND H M. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments［J］. Technometrics, 2008, 38(3): 284-286.

[24] [24] PATIL V, CHAUHAN A K, SINGH R P. Optimization of the spray-drying process for developing guava powder using response surface methodology［J］. Powder Technol, 2014, 253: 230-236.

[25] [25] MEHRABANI J V, NOAPARAST M, MOUSAVI S M, et al. Process optimization and modelling of sphalerite flotation from a low-grade Zn-Pb ore using response surface methodology［J］. Sep Purif Technol, 2010, 72(3): 242-249.

[26] [26] HIGUTI I H, SILVA P, PAPP J, et al. Colorimetric determination of alpha and beta-cyclodextrins and studies on optimization of CGTase production from B. firmus using factorial designs［J］. Braz Arch Biol Techn, 2004, 47(6): 42-53.

[27] [27] NOORDIN M Y, VENKATESH V C, SHARIF S, et al. Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel［J］. J Mater Process Tech, 2004, 145(1): 46-58.

[30] [30] JOURSHABANI M, BADIEI A, LASHGARI N, et al. Application of response surface methodology as an efficient approach for optimization of operational variables in benzene hydroxylation to phenol by V/SBA-16 nanoporous catalyst［J］. J Nanomater, 2016, 6(2): 105-113.

[31] [31] LIMA C, COELHO L F, CONTIERO J. The use of response surface methodology in optimization of lactic acid production: focus on medium supplementation, temperature and pH control［J］. Food Technol Biotech, 2010, 48(2): 175-181.

[32] [32] ALAM M S, AMARJIT S, SAWHNEY B K. Response surface optimization of osmotic dehydration process for aonla slices［J］. J Food Sci Tech Mys, 2010, 47(1): 47-54.

[33] [33] FAVERI D D, TORRE P, PEREGO P, et al. Optimization of xylitol recovery by crystallization from synthetic solutions using response surface methodology ［J］. J Food Eng, 2004, 61(3): 407-412.

[34] [34] BEY M B, MEZIANT L, BENCHIKH Y, et al. Deployment of response surface methodology to optimize recovery of dark fresh fig (ficus carica L. var. azenjar) total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity［J］. Food Chemistry, 2014, 21(4): 1477-1482.