Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, Volume. 50, Issue 3, 782(2022)
Optimisation of Ammonium Sulphate Crystallization Based on Response Surface Methodology
[2] [2] COLLE S, THOMAS D, VANDERSCHUREN J. Process simulation of sulphur dioxide abatement with hydrogen peroxide solutions in a packed column[J]. Chem Eng Res Des, 2005, 83(1): 81-87.
[11] [11] CHHANA A, LEE G, DALBETH N. Factors influencing the crystallization of monosodium urate: a systematic literature review[J]. BMC Musculoskel Dis, 2015, 16(1): 121-133.
[12] [12] AL-JIBBOURI S, STREGE C, ULRICH J. Crystallization kinetics of epsomite influenced by pH-value and impurities[J]. J Cryst Growth, 2002, 236(1): 400-406.
[14] [14] KUBOTA N. A new interpretation of metastable zone widths measured for unseeded solutions[J]. J Cryst Growth, 2008, 310(3): 629-634.
[17] [17] ULRICH C S. Morphology prediction of crystals grown in the presence of impurities and solvents: an evaluation of the state of the art [J]. J Cryst Growth, 2012, 353(1): 168-173.
[23] [23] RAYMOND H M. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments[J]. Technometrics, 2008, 38(3): 284-286.
[24] [24] PATIL V, CHAUHAN A K, SINGH R P. Optimization of the spray-drying process for developing guava powder using response surface methodology[J]. Powder Technol, 2014, 253: 230-236.
[25] [25] MEHRABANI J V, NOAPARAST M, MOUSAVI S M, et al. Process optimization and modelling of sphalerite flotation from a low-grade Zn-Pb ore using response surface methodology[J]. Sep Purif Technol, 2010, 72(3): 242-249.
[26] [26] HIGUTI I H, SILVA P, PAPP J, et al. Colorimetric determination of alpha and beta-cyclodextrins and studies on optimization of CGTase production from B. firmus using factorial designs[J]. Braz Arch Biol Techn, 2004, 47(6): 42-53.
[27] [27] NOORDIN M Y, VENKATESH V C, SHARIF S, et al. Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel[J]. J Mater Process Tech, 2004, 145(1): 46-58.
[30] [30] JOURSHABANI M, BADIEI A, LASHGARI N, et al. Application of response surface methodology as an efficient approach for optimization of operational variables in benzene hydroxylation to phenol by V/SBA-16 nanoporous catalyst[J]. J Nanomater, 2016, 6(2): 105-113.
[31] [31] LIMA C, COELHO L F, CONTIERO J. The use of response surface methodology in optimization of lactic acid production: focus on medium supplementation, temperature and pH control[J]. Food Technol Biotech, 2010, 48(2): 175-181.
[32] [32] ALAM M S, AMARJIT S, SAWHNEY B K. Response surface optimization of osmotic dehydration process for aonla slices[J]. J Food Sci Tech Mys, 2010, 47(1): 47-54.
[33] [33] FAVERI D D, TORRE P, PEREGO P, et al. Optimization of xylitol recovery by crystallization from synthetic solutions using response surface methodology [J]. J Food Eng, 2004, 61(3): 407-412.
[34] [34] BEY M B, MEZIANT L, BENCHIKH Y, et al. Deployment of response surface methodology to optimize recovery of dark fresh fig (ficus carica L. var. azenjar) total phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity[J]. Food Chemistry, 2014, 21(4): 1477-1482.
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
LI Rui, JIANG Yonghua, ZHANG Yanling, CHEN Kunqing, HUANG Bangfu, LI Lu. Optimisation of Ammonium Sulphate Crystallization Based on Response Surface Methodology[J]. Journal of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 50(3): 782
Category:
Received: Jun. 11, 2021
Accepted: --
Published Online: Nov. 11, 2022
The Author Email: