[1] [1] QUIROGA P N. FOWLER D W. The effect of the aggregates characteristics on the performance of Portland cement concrete［R］. ICAR - 104-1F, Austin: The University of Texas at Austin, 2003.

[2] [2] ZHU J, SHU X, TANG J H, et al. Effect of microfines from manufactured sand on yield stress of cement paste［J］. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 267: 120987.

[3] [3] YOSHIOKA K, TAZAWA E, KAWAI K, et al. Adsorption characteristics of superplasticizers on cement component minerals［J］. Cem Concr Res, 2002, 32: 1507-1513.

[4] [4] DALAS F, NONA A, POURCHET S, et al. Tailoring the anionic function and the side chains of comb-like superplasticizers to improve their adsorption［J］. Cem Concr Res, 2015, 67: 21-30.

[5] [5] WESTERHOLM M, LAGERBLAD B, FORSSBERG E. Rheological properties of micromortars containing fines from manufactured aggregates［J］. Mater Struct, 2007, 40(6): 615-625.

[6] [6] DIEDERICH P, MOURET M, DE RYCK A, et al. The nature of limestone filler and self-consolidating feasibility-Relationships between physical, chemical and mineralogical properties of fillers and the flow at different states, from powder to cement-based suspension［J］. Powder Technol, 2012, 218: 90-101.

[7] [7] FAN W, STOFFELBACH F, RIEGER J, et al. A new class of organosilane-modified polycarboxylate superplasticizers with low sulfate sensitivity［J］. Cem Concr Res, 2012, 42: 166-172.

[8] [8] SHA S, ZHANG Y, MA Y, et al. Effect of molecular structure of maleic anhydride, fumaric acid - Isopentenyl polyoxyethylene ether based polycarboxylate superplasticizer on its properties in cement pastes［J］. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 308: 125143.

[9] [9] EZZAT M, XU X, E L CHEIKH K, et al. Structure-property relationships for polycarboxylate ether superplasticizers by means of RAFT polymerization［J］. J Colloid Interf Sci, 2019, 553: 788-797.

[10] [10] LIU X, GUAN J, LAI G, et al. Performances and working mechanism of a novel polycarboxylate superplasticizer synthesized through changing molecular topological structure［J］. J Colloid Interf Sci, 2017, 504: 12-24.

[11] [11] SCHROFL C, GRUBER M, PLANK J. Preferential adsorption of polycarboxylate superplasticizers on cement and silica fume in ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC)［J］. Cem Concr Res, 2012, 42: 1401-1408.

[13] [13] ZHANG Y R, KONG X M, LU Z B, et al. Effects of the charge characteristics of polycarboxylate superplas-1545 ticizers on the adsorption and the retardation in cement pastes［J］. Cem Concr Res, 2015, 67: 184-196.

[14] [14] TRAMAUX A, AZEMA N, DAVID C, et al. Synthesis of phosphonated comb-like copolymers and evaluation of their dispersion efficiency on CaCO3 suspensions, Part I: Effect of an increasing phosphonic acid content［J］. Powder Technol, 2018, 333: 19-29.

[15] [15] TRAMAUX A, AZEMA N, DAVID C, et al. Synthesis of phosphonated comb-like copolymers and evaluation of their dispersion efficiency on CaCO3 suspensions part II: Effect of macromolecular structure and ionic strength［J］. Powder Technol, 2018, 333: 19-29.

[16] [16] TRAMAUX A, AZEMA N, DAVID C, et al. Diphosphonated comb-like copolymers synthesis as suspensions dispersants and their resistance to ionic competition phenomenon［J］. Powder Technol, 2018, 335: 19-29.

[17] [17] HE Y, SHU X, WANG X M, et al. Effects of polycarboxylates with different adsorption groups on the rheological properties of cement paste［J］. J Disper Sci Technol, 2020, 41(6): 873-883.

[18] [18] FLATT RJ, SCHOBER I, RAPHAEL E, et al. Conformation of adsorbed comb copolymer dispersants［J］. Langmuir 2009, 25: 845-855.

[20] [20] DE REESE J, PLANK J. Adsorption of polyelectrolytes on calcium carbonate-which thermodynamic parameters are driving this process?［J］ J Am Ceram Soc, 2011, 94(10): 3515-3522.

[21] [21] PLANK J, SACHSENHAUSER B, REESE J. Experimental determination of the thermodynamic parameters affecting the adsorption behavior and dispersion effectiveness of PCE superplasticizers［J］. Cem Concr Res, 2010, 40: 699-709.

[23] [23] PLANK J, VLAD D, BRANDL A, et al. Colloidal chemistry examination of the steric effect of polycarboxylate superplasticizers［J］. Cem Int, 2005, 3: 101-110.

[24] [24] ROUSSEL N. Correlation between yield stress and slump: comparison between numerical simulations and concrete rheometers results［J］. Mater Struct, 2006, 39: 501-509.

[25] [25] ROUSSEL N, STEFANI C, LEROY R. From mini-cone test to Abrams cone test: Measurement of cement-based materials yield stress using slump tests［J］. Cem Concr Res, 2005, 35 (5): 817-822.

[26] [26] ROUSSEL N, COUSSOT P. “Fifty-cent rheometer” for yield stress measurements: From slump to spreading flow［J］. J Rheol, 2005, 49(3): 705-718.

[27] [27] ROUSSEL N, LEMATRE A, FLATT R J, et al. Steady state flow of cement suspensions: a micromechanical state of the art［J］. Cem Concr Res, 2010, 40: 77-84.

[28] [28] HOT J, BESSAIES-BEY H, BRUMAUD C, et al. Adsorbing polymers and viscosity of cement pastes［J］. Cem Concr Res, 2014, 63: 12-19.

[29] [29] ZHU J, LIU J P, KHAYAT K H, et al. Mechanisms affecting viscosity of cement paste made with microfines of manufactured sand［J］. Cem Concr Res, 2022, 156: 106757.

[30] [30] ZHANG Q Q, SHU X, YU X H, et al. Toward the viscosity reducing of cement paste: optimization of the molecular weight of polycarboxylate superplasticizers［J］. Constr Build Mater, 2020, 242: 117984.