Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 41, Issue 3, 0315002(2021)

Data-Driven Awareness Technology for Space Target Image Information

Xiaoshan Yang1, Xuefeng Pan1, Shaojie Su3, and Peng Jia1,2、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1College of Physics and Optoelectronics, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 0 30024, China
  • 2Key Laboratory of Advanced Transducers and Intelligent Control Systems, Ministry of Education and Shanxi Province, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 0 30024, China
  • 3People′s Property Insurance Company of China, Taiyuan Branch, Taiyuan, Shanxi 0 30001, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(18)
    Architecture of YOLOv3 network
    Flow chart of expert system
    Part of simulated dataset, including 18 satellites, each of which has 5 attitudes
    Part of real dataset. (a) Clear; (b) blur of lower degree; (c) blur of higher degree
    Class and state datasets of space targets. (a) reconnaissance-1; (b) reconnaissance-2; (c) communication satellite; (d) KH-11
    Specific dividing method for training set
    Detection results of space target payloads in simulated images. (a)(e)(i) Clear images (T1); (b)(f)(j) blur images (T2) with noise of 9 dB; (c)(g)(k) blur images (T3) with noise of 9 dB; (d)(h)(l) blur images (T3) with noise of 7 dB
    Payload identification results of real data (ISS). (a) 1st frame; (b) 20th frame; (c) 40th frame
    Payload identification results of space targets from website images. (a)(b)(c) ISS; (d) Hubble telescope; (e) Sentinel; (f) unknown space target
    Payload identification results of space target for Gaussian blur. (a)(e) Original high-resolution clear images; (b)(f) clear images; (c)(g) Gaussian blur images from T2'; (d)(h) Gaussian blur images from T3'
    State identification results of simulated space targets. (a) Clear image from T1; (b) blur image from T2; (c) blur image from T3
    State identification results of real data (ISS)
    • Table 1. Classification of working states of space targets

      View table

      Table 1. Classification of working states of space targets

      Working state of space targetState of payload
      Normal work(Lens-open/lens-unknown) & (antenna-open/antenna-unknown) &(solar-panel-open/solar-panel-unknown)
      Abnormal workLens-close/antenna-close/solar-panel-close
    • Table 2. Parameters for Monte Carlo simulation

      View table

      Table 2. Parameters for Monte Carlo simulation

      ParameterValue
      Diameter of telescope aperture4 m
      Exposure time1 s
      Observation band500 nm
      Field of view (FOV)6″
      Pixel scale0.003″
      Field parameter0.3 m, 0.1 m
    • Table 3. Test results of space target payload identification

      View table

      Table 3. Test results of space target payload identification

      ClassAPPR
      Lens0.77680.77580.8164
      Antenna0.73530.73620.7940
      Solar panel0.90910.92780.9290
      Average0.8071±0.02000.8133±0.01000.8465±0.0200
    • Table 4. Parameters for Gaussian blur and noise

      View table

      Table 4. Parameters for Gaussian blur and noise

      DatasetGaussian blurGaussian noise
      Kernel sizeSigmaMean value μStandard deviation σ
      T2'1555000.01
      T3'25510000.01
    • Table 5. Test results of space target payload identification (Gaussian blur)

      View table

      Table 5. Test results of space target payload identification (Gaussian blur)

      ClassAPPR
      Lens0.76640.80360.8190
      Antenna0.77220.79250.8229
      Solar panel0.91620.91710.9341
      Average0.8183±0.07000.8377±0.05000.8587±0.0200
    • Table 6. Test results of status identification for space object

      View table

      Table 6. Test results of status identification for space object

      ModelClassAPPR
      Communication satellite0.92090.78050.9697
      Reconnaissance-10.92080.71191.0000
      Object modelReconnaissance-20.70910.79490.7949
      KH-110.94950.97180.9583
      ISS0.99070.98200.9909
      Average0.8982±0.30000.8486±0.04000.9428±0.0300
      Lens open0.69910.76350.7533
      Lens close0.18420.32350.3667
      Antenna open0.67180.76920.7222
      Working modelAntenna close0.66670.88890.6667
      Solar panel open0.83180.74050.9030
      Solar panel close0.80880.91640.8320
      Average0.6437±0.040.7337±0.030.7073±0.03
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xiaoshan Yang, Xuefeng Pan, Shaojie Su, Peng Jia. Data-Driven Awareness Technology for Space Target Image Information[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(3): 0315002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Machine Vision

    Received: Aug. 25, 2020

    Accepted: Sep. 24, 2020

    Published Online: Feb. 28, 2021

    The Author Email: Jia Peng (robinmartin20@gmail.com)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202141.0315002

    Topics