Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 52, Issue 12, 20230034(2023)
Construction and development of LSS target prevention and control system
Figures & Tables(6)
Fig. 2. The architecture of LSS-target prevention and control system
Fig. 3. Operational process of LSS-target prevention and control system
Table 1. Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of different detections and processing methods
View tableView in ArticleTable 1. Analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of different detections and processing methods
Methods Advantages Disadvantages Radar detection All-weather operation, provides distance information, long detection range, high detection efficiency The low-altitude detection exhibits a high false alarm rate, susceptibility to electronic interference, blind spots in close-range detection, inadequate resolution of detection, and a low probability of identification Optical-electronic detection High detection accuracy, strong identification capability, visualized information, fully passive detection The field of view is limited, resulting in a reduced detection efficiency. Additionally, the lack of distance information in a single installation hinders accurate assessment. Moreover, this system exhibits inadequate adaptability to extreme weather conditions and fails to detect non-line-of-sight targets Radio detection All-weather operation, high detection efficiency, ability to identify spectrum features, aircraft type, and operator location Limited detection accuracy; inadequate performance against electromagnetically silent targets; vulnerable to interference in complex electromagnetic environments Acoustic detection All-weather operation, 360° omni-directional, ability to detect targets behind obstacles Limited detection range; suboptimal performance in noisy environments; reduced acoustic detection accuracy; challenges in target profiling Electronic interference Strong all-weather operational capability, ability to engage multiple targets with high efficiency Urban usage may induce interference directionality, rendering it ineffective against non-electromagnetic or electromagnetically silent targets. Aerial net capture/net dispensing Minimizes collateral damage, enables evidence collection The operational efficiency of a single aerial net capture drone is limited to one target, resulting in low effectiveness; additionally, the high cost associated with the deployment of net dispensing equipment poses a significant financial burden Laser interception Complete destruction of target, causing blindness and dizziness Limited environmental adaptability; tracking and aiming involve significant technical challenges; urban deployment may result in collateral damage and pose potential safety risks High-power microwave Effective against a group of targets, high efficiency in target engagement Significant interference in urban environments, coupled with substantial volume, weight, and power consumption, necessitates further technological advancements for improved maturity
Tools
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Liya Li, Song He, Zhu Zhao, Ya Song, Rong Cai, Changmeng Zhang, Ruifeng Fan, Dongyi Yu. Construction and development of LSS target prevention and control system[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(12): 20230034
Paper Information
Category:
Received: Jan. 18, 2023
Accepted: --
Published Online: Feb. 23, 2024
The Author Email:
© Copyright 2018-2021 | Chinese Laser Press.
All Rights Reserved 沪ICP备15018463号-20