Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 40, Issue 2, 0216001(2020)

Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Technology of Subsurface Defects in Fused Silica Optical Components

Jianpu Zhang1, Huanyu Sun1, Shiling Wang1, Jin Huang2, Xiaoyan Zhou2, Fengrui Wang2, Hongjie Liu2, and Dong Liu1、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, College of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310027, China
  • 2Laser Fusion Research Center, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang, Sichuan 621900, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(16)
    Imaging principle of laser scanning confocal microscope. (a) Device principle; (b) pinhole structure; (c) horizontal and vertical scanning
    Two modes of silica detected by laser scanning confocal microscope. (a) Scattering mode; (b) fluorescence mode
    Typical subsurface defects collected by confocal microscope. (a) Pitting defect; (b) pit defect
    Processing effects of Fig. 3(b) by using defect enhancement algorithm. (a) Enhanced image; (b) aggregated image
    Principle of double-threshold aggregation algorithm. (a) Original image; (b) processed image
    Principle of improved MC algorithm based on octree algorithm. (a) Establishment of volume data; (b) octree segmentation
    Flow chart of three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm
    Reconstruction of pit defect in simulation. (a) Simulated defect; (b) reconstructed defect in simulation; (c) residual of reconstruction
    Tomography image obtained from simulation. (a) Cross-section of defect from simulation; (b) confocal tomography image obtained from simulation
    Restoration ratio of point cloud after reconstruction by three different algorithms
    Detection results of subsurface defects. (a) Scratch defect; (b) microcrack defect; (c) pit defect
    Subaperture scanning images
    Reconstruction results of subsurface defects. (a)(b) Reconstruction results of scratch defects; (c)(d) reconstruction results of microcrack defects; (e)(f) reconstruction results of pit defects
    Destructive test results of subsurface defects of fused silica. (a) Etching test results of pit defects[17]; (b) polishing-residual subsurface defects[18]; (c) scratch defects[19]; (d) pit defects[20]
    • Table 1. Running time and occupied memory spaces of three different algorithms

      View table

      Table 1. Running time and occupied memory spaces of three different algorithms

      Number of voxelsAverage time /msMemory space consumption /MB
      Contour FilterOriginal MCImproved MCContour FilterOriginal MCImproved MC
      1030.50.40.40.010.010.01
      5037051452.13.11.3
      100331235628610114032
      10002×100193122863210832752900562
    • Table 2. Defect volume distributions of experimental samples

      View table

      Table 2. Defect volume distributions of experimental samples

      Defect size /μm3Number of defectsTotal volume /μm3Volume ratio (0--50 μm in depth) /%
      0--100135560.002
      >100--200711230.003
      >200--3002154330.012
      >300--4002485120.025
      >400633620.010
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jianpu Zhang, Huanyu Sun, Shiling Wang, Jin Huang, Xiaoyan Zhou, Fengrui Wang, Hongjie Liu, Dong Liu. Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Technology of Subsurface Defects in Fused Silica Optical Components[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 0216001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Materials

    Received: Jul. 22, 2019

    Accepted: Sep. 19, 2019

    Published Online: Jan. 2, 2020

    The Author Email: Liu Dong (liudongopt@zju.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202040.0216001

    Topics