[2] [2] ZHAO J H, TONG L Y, LI B E, et al. Eco-friendly geopolymer materials: a review of performance improvement, potential application and sustainability assessment［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 307: 127085.

[3] [3] SINGH N B, MIDDENDORF B. Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: an overview［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 237: 117455.

[5] [5] XIE J T, KAYALI O. Effect of superplasticiser on workability enhancement of Class F and Class C fly ash-based geopolymers［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 122: 36-42.

[6] [6] XIONG G Y, GUO X L. Effects and mechanism of superplasticizers and precursor proportions on the fresh properties of fly ash-slag powder based geopolymers［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 350: 128734.

[7] [7] ALREFAEI Y, WANG Y S, DAI J G. The effectiveness of different superplasticizers in ambient cured one-part alkali activated pastes［J］. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 97: 166-174.

[8] [8] LI S C, ZHANG J, LI Z F, et al. Feasibility study of red mud-blast furnace slag based geopolymeric grouting material: effect of superplasticizers［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 267: 120910.

[9] [9] NEMATOLLAHI B, SANJAYAN J. Effect of different superplasticizers and activator combinations on workability and strength of fly ash based geopolymer［J］. Materials & Design, 2014, 57: 667-672.

[10] [10] RAKNGAN W, WILLIAMSON T, FERRON R D, et al. Controlling workability in alkali-activated Class C fly ash［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 183: 226-233.

[12] [12] KUMAR A, SARAVANAN T J, BISHT K, et al. A review on the utilization of red mud for the production of geopolymer and alkali activated concrete［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 302: 124170.

[13] [13] WANG M F, LIU X M. Applications of red mud as an environmental remediation material: a review［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 408: 124420.

[16] [16] LYU F, HU Y H, WANG L, et al. Dealkalization processes of bauxite residue: a comprehensive review［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 403: 123671.

[20] [20] ZHANG C, YANG J S, OU X F, et al. Clay dosage and water/cement ratio of clay-cement grout for optimal engineering performance［J］. Applied Clay Science, 2018, 163: 312-318.

[22] [22] CARABBA L, MANZI S, BIGNOZZI M. Superplasticizer addition to carbon fly ash geopolymers activated at room temperature［J］. Materials, 2016, 9(7): 586.

[23] [23] JANOWSKA-RENKAS E. The effect of superplasticizers’ chemical structure on their efficiency in cement pastes［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2013, 38: 1204-1210.

[24] [24] PALACIOS M, PUERTAS F. Effect of superplasticizer and shrinkage-reducing admixtures on alkali-activated slag pastes and mortars［J］. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(7): 1358-1367.

[25] [25] JANG J G, LEE N K, LEE H K. Fresh and hardened properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes with superplasticizers［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 50: 169-176.

[29] [29] LI H, WANG Z H, ZHANG Y W, et al. Composite application of naphthalene and melamine-based superplasticizers in alkali activated fly ash (AAFA)［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 297: 123651.

[30] [30] BAI B, BAI F, NIE Q K, et al. A high-strength red mud-fly ash geopolymer and the implications of curing temperature［J］. Powder Technology, 2023, 416: 118242.

[31] [31] HU W, NIE Q K, HUANG B S, et al. Mechanical and microstructural characterization of geopolymers derived from red mud and fly ashes［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 186: 799-806.

[32] [32] LIU J P, LI X Y, LU Y S, et al. Effects of Na/Al ratio on mechanical properties and microstructure of red mud-coal metakaolin geopolymer［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 263: 120653.

[33] [33] LEMOUGNA P N, WANG K T, TANG Q, et al. Study on the development of inorganic polymers from red mud and slag system: application in mortar and lightweight materials［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 156: 486-495.

[34] [34] YANG J, XU L H, WU H Q, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer composites containing high volume of spodumene tailings［J］. Applied Clay Science, 2022, 218: 106412.

[35] [35] ZHAO X H, LIU C Y, ZUO L M, et al. Investigation into the effect of calcium on the existence form of geopolymerized gel product of fly ash based geopolymers［J］. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2019, 103: 279-292.

[36] [36] LIU J, HU L, TANG L P, et al. Utilisation of municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) fly ash with metakaolin for preparation of alkali-activated cementitious material［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 402: 123451.

[37] [37] ZHANG W, LIU X M, WANG Y G, et al. Binary reaction behaviors of red mud based cementitious material: hydration characteristics and Na+ utilization［J］. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 410: 124592.

[38] [38] CHEN K L, LIN W T, LIU Q, et al. Micro-characterizations and geopolymerization mechanism of ternary cementless composite with reactive ultra-fine fly ash, red mud and recycled powder［J］. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 343: 128091.