Chinese Journal of Lasers, Volume. 50, Issue 8, 0802201(2023)

Effect of Laser Parameters on Corrosion Resistance of Laser Melting Layer on Q235B Steel Surface

Lidong Yu1,2, Tianxuan Bian1,2, Yunteng Qu1,3, Beibei Zhang2, and Yang Bai1,2,3、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Photonics and Photon-Technology, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, Shaanxi, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Photon-Technology in Western China Energy, Xi’an 710127, Shaanxi, China
  • 3Shaanxi Engineering Technology Research Center for Solid State Lasers and Application, Xi’an 710127, Shaanxi, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(17)
    Schematic of laser melting unit, where the inset shows laser beam scanning path and two-dimensional energy distribution
    Macroscopic and microscopic images of laser melting layer
    Dynamic potential polarization curves of laser melting layer at different laser single pulse energy densities and spot overlap rates
    SEM images of laser melting layers with optimal laser single pulse energy density and different spot overlap rates for a single laser scanning. (a) β=70%; (b) β=80%; (c) β=90%
    Dynamic potential polarization curves of laser melting layer with different laser scanning times (Eopt=3.82 J/cm2 and β=80%)
    SEM images of laser melting layers with different laser scanning times n (Eopt=3.82 J/cm2 and β=80%). (a) n=1; (b) n=2;
    Sectional SEM image of optimal laser melting layer
    EDS spectra and XRD patterns of tested samples. (a) EDS spectrum of substrate; (b) EDS spectrum of alkaline blackening layer; (c) EDS spectrum of optimal laser melting layer; (d) XRD patterns
    Electrochemical test of corrosion resistant layers. (a) Dynamic potential polarization curves; (b) Nyquist curves; (c) Bode plots
    EIS equivalent circuit
    Microscopic morphologies of two corrosion resistant layers. (a)(d) Thickness of cut surfaces; (b)(e) three-dimensional
    • Table 1. Single pulse energy density at different average laser powers

      View table

      Table 1. Single pulse energy density at different average laser powers

      Average power /WEnergy density /(J·cm-2
      101.27
      202.55
      303.82
      405.09
      506.36
    • Table 2. Parameters related to kinetic potential polarization curves at different laser single pulse energy densities and spot overlap rates in a single laser scanning

      View table

      Table 2. Parameters related to kinetic potential polarization curves at different laser single pulse energy densities and spot overlap rates in a single laser scanning

      Spot overlap rate β/%E /(J·cm-2Ecorr /VIcorr /(A·cm-2
      701.27-1.2402.649×10-5
      2.55-1.2202.506×10-5
      3.82-1.0063.069×10-6
      5.09-1.1229.840×10-6
      6.36-1.1309.705×10-5
      801.27-1.2241.352×10-5
      2.55-1.2069.120×10-6
      3.82-0.9732.449×10-6
      5.09-1.0951.845×10-5
      6.36-1.0851.368×10-5
      901.27-1.1893.388×10-5
      2.55-1.2225.495×10-5
      3.82-0.9853.707×10-6
      5.09-1.0981.901×10-5
      6.36-1.1031.892×10-5
    • Table 3. Parameters related to kinetic potential polarization curves with different laser scanning times (Eopt=3.82 J/cm2 and β=80%)

      View table

      Table 3. Parameters related to kinetic potential polarization curves with different laser scanning times (Eopt=3.82 J/cm2 and β=80%)

      The number of laser scanning nEcorr /VIcorr /(A·cm-2
      1-0.9732.449×10-6
      2-0.9482.265×10-6
      3-0.9431.990×10-6
      4-0.9361.644×10-6
      5-1.0175.848×10-6
      6-1.0327.967×10-6
    • Table 4. EDS analysis data at different thicknesses on the section of optimal laser melting layer

      View table

      Table 4. EDS analysis data at different thicknesses on the section of optimal laser melting layer

      Layer No.Point No.Mass fraction /%
      FeOC
      Layer aa197.611.341.05
      a297.621.261.12
      a397.601.291.11
      Layer bb190.278.750.98
      b290.208.791.01
      b390.078.911.02
      Layer cc183.8315.240.93
      c283.4815.530.99
      c384.0315.030.94
      Layer dd183.2515.840.91
      d282.9716.090.94
      d383.2415.870.89
    • Table 5. EDS analysis data of samples to be tested

      View table

      Table 5. EDS analysis data of samples to be tested

      SampleMass fraction /%
      FeOC
      Substrate97.661.241.10
      Alkaline blackening layer86.1812.870.95
      Laser melting layer83.8715.200.93
    • Table 6. Fitting parameter values of EIS equivalent circuit

      View table

      Table 6. Fitting parameter values of EIS equivalent circuit

      SpecimenR1 /(Ω·cm2Q1 /μSm1R2 /(Ω·cm2Q2 /μSm2Rct /(Ω·cm2χ2 /10-3
      Alkaline blackening layer29.21270.819410.20.76520.91.21
      Laser melting layer25.12240.925274.20.851536.72.91
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Lidong Yu, Tianxuan Bian, Yunteng Qu, Beibei Zhang, Yang Bai. Effect of Laser Parameters on Corrosion Resistance of Laser Melting Layer on Q235B Steel Surface[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2023, 50(8): 0802201

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Laser Surface Machining

    Received: May. 18, 2022

    Accepted: Jul. 12, 2022

    Published Online: Dec. 21, 2022

    The Author Email: Bai Yang (by@nwu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/CJL220866

    Topics