Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 53, Issue 10, 20240225(2024)

Effect of thermal deformation of spherical cover structure on imaging quality of compound eye optical system

Yuan WANG, Chen YANG, Shijie LI, and Jin ZHANG
Author Affiliations
  • Institute of Optoelectronic Engineering, Xi'an Technological University, Xi'an 710021, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(17)
    (a) Optical path diagram of relay sub-camera; (b) Mechanical structure diagram of relay camera
    (a) MTF diagram of single subsystem; (b) Field curvature and distortion
    Building solid model in SolidWorks
    (a) Unstructured mesh; (b) Structured mesh
    (a) Axial displacement nephogram; Partial enlarged view: (b) Central hole position; (c) Surrounding hole position; (d) Diagonal hole position
    (a) Hole location diagram; (b) Upper edge path setting; (c) Upper and lower edge path settings
    Schematic diagram of vector before and after deformation
    MTF diagram of relay sub-cameras with different hole positions in different fields of view. (a) Position 3; (b) Position 5; (c) Position 6
    Line chart of MTF change
    • Table 1. System specific parameters

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. System specific parameters

      ParameterValue
      Focal length of sub-eye f1/mm53
      Angle of adjacent sub-eye $ \Delta \varphi $/(°)6.8
      Number of sub-eye N9
      Focal length of system f/mm40
      FOV (Field of view) 2$ \omega $/(°)22.6
      Overlapping field of view range $ \Delta $/(°)2.85
      Total volume of the system V390 mm ×100 mm×100 mm
      Total weight M/g1350
    • Table 2. Wavefront aberration at different wavelengths and field of view angles

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Wavefront aberration at different wavelengths and field of view angles

      Wavelength λ/nmField of view $ \omega $/(°)Wavefront aberration RMS
      48600.0730
      486 4.50.1935
      587 00.0284
      5874.50.1323
      656 00.0941
      6564.50.0697
    • Table 3. Comparison of parameters between simulation mesh and reference mesh

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison of parameters between simulation mesh and reference mesh

      Mesh typeValue of nodesValue of element
      Low density (hexahedral mesh)3091222872
      High density (hexahedral mesh)222704188560
    • Table 4. Material properties of the model

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Material properties of the model

      ParameterValue
      Density $ \rho/\times10^3\mathrm{\ kg}\cdot\mathrm{m}^{-3} $7.85
      Poisson's ratio $ \mu $0.3
      Coefficient of thermal expansion $ \alpha $/×10−6·℃−112
      Elastic modulus $ E/\mathrm{MP_a} $200000
    • Table 5. Comparison of maximum deformation calculation between low density mesh and high density mesh under different temperatures

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Comparison of maximum deformation calculation between low density mesh and high density mesh under different temperatures

      Temperature/Low density mesh/mmHigh density mesh/mmD value/mmError rate
      300.043540.043640.000100.22915%
      400.097960.098190.000220.22407%
      500.152390.152730.000340.22262%
      600.206810.207280.000470.22267%
      700.261230.261830.000600.22916%
      800.315660.316370.000710.22442%
      900.370080.370920.000840.22646%
      1000.424510.425470.000960.22563%
    • Table 6. Eccentricity and axial displacement of different hole positions

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Eccentricity and axial displacement of different hole positions

      Position$ \Delta x $/mm$ \Delta y $/mm$ \Delta z $/mm
      Structural steel-30.0190.0230.188
      Structural steel-50.0090.0000.423
      Structural steel-60.0390.0000.266
    • Table 7. Inclination values of different hole positions

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7. Inclination values of different hole positions

      Position$ {\theta }_{x} $/(°)$ {\theta }_{y} $/(°)$ {\theta }_{z} $/(°)
      Structural steel-30.2700.2680.065
      Structural steel-50.0000.0000.000
      Structural steel-60.3670.0000.062
    • Table 8. Bring into the initial optical system

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 8. Bring into the initial optical system

      ActiveConfig 1Config 2Config 3Config 4
      THIC137.004137.192137.427137.270
      PRAM10.000−0.0190.0090.039
      PRAM20.0000.0230.0000.000
      PRAM30.0000.2700.000−0.367
      PRAM40.000−0.2680.0000.000
      PRAM50.0000.0650.0000.062
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yuan WANG, Chen YANG, Shijie LI, Jin ZHANG. Effect of thermal deformation of spherical cover structure on imaging quality of compound eye optical system[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2024, 53(10): 20240225

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: 光学设计

    Received: Jun. 11, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Dec. 13, 2024

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/IRLA20240225

    Topics