Chinese Physics B, Volume. 29, Issue 10, (2020)

Mechanical and microstructural response of densified silica glass under uniaxial compression: Atomistic simulations

Yi-Fan Xie1...2, Feng Feng1, Ying-Jun Li2,†, Zhi-Qiang Hu3, Jian-Li Shao3, and Yong Mei34 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Science, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 00083, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • 4Institute of Defense Engineering, AMS, PLA, Beijing 100036, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(14)
    Normal stress (a) and maximum shear stress (b) as a function of strain for different silica glass samples (S1–S5). Three stages are displayed, and hardening tendency increases with initial densification.
    Pressure-density relation for silica glass samples: present study compared with the experiments. Curves S1–S5: under uniaxial compression; circle and triangle: hydrostatic experimental data obtained by Meade et al.[38] and Sato et al.;[39] square and pentagon: shock experimental data obtained by Renou et al.[21] and Sugiura et al.[41] Yield pressure of densified silica glass ranges from 5 to 12 GPa. All curves converge at 12 GPa.
    Density as a function of pressure for S1 during uniaxial loading-unloading. Densification and hysteresis are both shown. A, B, C, D and E correspond to strains of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5, respectively. The solid line represents the loading path, and the dotted lines are the unloading paths.
    RDFs of Si–O (a) Si–Si (b) O–O (c) for S1 at different strains. RDFs of Si–O (d) Si–Si (e) O–O (f) for glass unloaded from different strains. The arrows indicate the change of the peak position. The RDFs of the unloaded sample are consistent with the initial state.
    BADs of Si–O–Si (a) O–Si–O (b) for S1 at different strains. BADs of Si–O–Si (c) O–Si–O (d) for glass unloaded from different strains. The arrows indicate the change of the peak position. The Si–O–Si bond angle of silica glass unloaded from the inelastic region becomes smaller.
    Si–O coordination number curves of S1 at different strains. The average coordination number of Si–O increases with strain from 4 to around 6.
    (a) Fractions of 4-fold, 5-fold, 6-fold coordinated Si atoms versus strain. Pink atoms: Si, blue atoms: O in the insert figure). Here 5-fold Si increases linearly with strain in plastic region and 6-fold Si increases mainly in hardening region. (b) Color micrographs of Si atoms according to the coordination number CN color bar. The figure only includes Si atoms. The cutoff distance for coordination is set to 2.4 Å.
    (a) Average atomic displacement as a function of strain, and (b) microstructure of atoms in X–Y plane at different strains according to the R(i) color bar. The law of atomic lateral diffusion during uniaxial compression is shown.
    The density of recovered glass at 0 GPa as a function of the maximum strain reached. Results for all the samples are displayed.
    Density as a function of pressure for S3 (a) and S5 (b) during uniaxial loading-unloading. Solid and hollow triangles represent the hydrostatic experimental data on compression and decompression obtained by Sato et al.[42].
    BADs of Si–O–Si (a) O–Si–O (b) for the initial state, 0.3 strain, unloaded state of S5. The arrows indicate the change of the peak position. The Si–O–Si bond angle becomes smaller.
    • Table 1. Values of Aij, Bij, Cij, and aij, bij, cij are taken from Refs. [27,31].

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Values of Aij, Bij, Cij, and aij, bij, cij are taken from Refs. [27,31].

      Aij/JBij/m−1Cij/J⋅m6aij/(J/m2)bij/(J/m)cij/J
      O–O2.225 × 10−162.760 × 10102.804 × 10−771.510 × 102−7.925 × 10−81.100 × 10−17
      Si–O2.884 × 10−154.873 × 10102.139 × 10−773.413 × 102−9.361 × 10−83.925 × 10−18
      Si–Si0.00.00.00.00.00.0
    • Table 2. The proportions of 3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold, and 6-fold Si atoms of S1–S5.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. The proportions of 3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold, and 6-fold Si atoms of S1–S5.

      3-fold Si/%4-fold Si/%5-fold Si/%6-fold Si/%
      S1098.941.010
      S21.0696.551.870.01
      S31.0594.873.530.04
      S41.0690.497.770.18
      S51.0484.2613.670.53
    • Table 3. The proportions of 4-fold, 5-fold, and 6-fold Si atoms of the initial state, 0.3 strain, and unloaded state of S5.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. The proportions of 4-fold, 5-fold, and 6-fold Si atoms of the initial state, 0.3 strain, and unloaded state of S5.

      4-fold Si/%5-fold Si/%6-fold Si/%
      S584.2613.670.53
      0.3 strain10.5853.3734.88
      0.3 strain_unload81.9315.890.66
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yi-Fan Xie, Feng Feng, Ying-Jun Li, Zhi-Qiang Hu, Jian-Li Shao, Yong Mei. Mechanical and microstructural response of densified silica glass under uniaxial compression: Atomistic simulations[J]. Chinese Physics B, 2020, 29(10):

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Received: Apr. 10, 2020

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Apr. 21, 2021

    The Author Email: Li Ying-Jun (meiyong1990@126.com)

    DOI:10.1088/1674-1056/aba5fe

    Topics