Study On Optical Communications, Volume. 49, Issue 5, 30(2023)

Evaluation of Service Bearing Performance of SDON Optical Transmission Network in Electric Power Communication

Li-xia ZHANG1... Jian-liang ZHANG1, Yi AN1, Xiao-rui HU2 and Jun-hong NI2,* |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Information and Communication Branch of State Grid Shanxi Electric Power Company, Taiyuan 030021, China
  • 2Department of Electronic & Communication Engineering, North China Electric Power University(Baoding), Baoding 071003, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(14)
    Primary election index system
    The contribution of each indicator to each attribute
    The order of indices corresponding to different P values changes
    The results of attribute value aggregation
    Comparison of ranking results that emphasize the advantage of attribute values
    The result of OWA-E-TOPSIS(P=6.75)
    OWA-E-TOPSIS (P=6.75) method results of index aggregation values in descending order
    The indicator system
    The result of standardization of index values
    • Table 1. The meaning of each attribute

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. The meaning of each attribute

      属性含义
      重要性评价指标所评价的内容对待评价单元的影响程度
      合理性评价指标对待评价单元的适合度
      独立性评价指标对评价指标体系中其他指标的依赖程度
      客观性定量获取评价指标值的难易程度
      针对性评价指标对SDON架构的考虑程度
    • Table 2. The contribution of "control link length mean-square value" to each attribute

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. The contribution of "control link length mean-square value" to each attribute

      属性重要性合理性独立性客观性针对性
      贡献度0.101 60.055 20.033 30.077 10.127 3
    • Table 3. Consistency when emphasizing attribute value advantages

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Consistency when emphasizing attribute value advantages

      决策方法相关系数
      OWA-SAW & OWA-E-TOPSIS(P=1)1.000 0
      OWA-SAW & OWA-E-TOPSIS(P=2)0.996 9
      OWA-GRA & OWA-E-TOPSIS(P=1)0.936 4
      OWA-GRA & OWA-E-TOPSIS(P=2)0.924 8
      OWA-SAW & OWA-GRA0.936 4
      OWA-E-TOPSIS(P=1) & OWA-E-TOPSIS(P=2)0.996 9
    • Table 4. Index weights and utility parameters

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Index weights and utility parameters

      编号数值类型性质效用区间ab权重
      D1时间类成本[710](10 μs)1.468.500.124
      D2时间类成本[0,0.5]8.790.250.026
      D3不可靠类成本[0.1,0.4]7.320.700.267
      D4比例类成本[0.1,0.5]0.100.500.056
      D5可靠类效益[0.990 0,0.999 9]2.203.000.057
      D6不可靠类成本[1e-3,1e-1]2.202.000.113
      D7不可靠类成本[1e-3,1e-2]4.402.500.081
      D8不可靠类成本[1e-3,1e-2]4.402.500.081
      D9不可靠类成本[1e-3,1e-2]4.402.500.081
      D10不可靠类成本[1e-3,1e-1]2.202.000.041
      D11利用率类区间效益[0.3,0.7]0.110.500.014
      D12比例类效益[0.6,0.9]0.600.900.023
      D13比例类成本[0.1,0.4]0.100.400.036
    • Table 5. The evaluation results

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. The evaluation results

      参评运行单位评价结果
      A10.798 3
      A20.764 4
      A30.648 2
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Li-xia ZHANG, Jian-liang ZHANG, Yi AN, Xiao-rui HU, Jun-hong NI. Evaluation of Service Bearing Performance of SDON Optical Transmission Network in Electric Power Communication[J]. Study On Optical Communications, 2023, 49(5): 30

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: Aug. 11, 2022

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Nov. 22, 2023

    The Author Email: NI Jun-hong (xxnjh5155@126.com)

    DOI:10.13756/j.gtxyj.2023.05.005

    Topics