Simulation Analysis of Space Debris Observation Capability of Multi-Optoelectronic Equipment

Jingjing Hu; Shaoming Hu; Jing Liu; Xu Chen; Junju Du

doi:10.3788/AOS202040.1504002

Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 40, Issue 15, 1504002(2020)

Simulation Analysis of Space Debris Observation Capability of Multi-Optoelectronic Equipment

Jingjing Hu^1、**, Shaoming Hu^1、*, Jing Liu², Xu Chen¹, and Junju Du¹

¹Shandong Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy and Solar-Terrestrial Environment, Institute of Space Sciences, Shandong University, Weihai, Shandong 264209, China

²Space Debris Monitoring and Application Center of China National Space Administration, National Astronomical Observatories, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

show less

Abstract Get PDF(in Chinese)

Figures & Tables(9)

Fig. 1. Schematic of detection process of evaluation model for combined detection capability of multiple optoelectronic equipment

Download full size

Table 1. Setting of telescope parameters and CCD parameters

View table

Table 1. Setting of telescope parameters and CCD parameters

Telescope parameter					CCD parameter
Aperture /cm	FOV /[(°)×(°)]	Single pixel FOV /(″)	Transmittance	Metering aperture /pixel	k_dark /(electron·s^-1·pixel^-1)	K_rdout /electron	Quantum efficiency	Detection threshold
15	12×12	12.38	0.7	3	0.15	3.7	0.7	5
28	6×6	6.99	0.7	5	0.15	3.7	0.7	5

Table 2. Setting of simulation basic parameters
View table
Table 2. Setting of simulation basic parameters
Exposure time /s Albedo Band range /nm Duration /h
1.0 0.2 380--780 12

Table 3. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on July 1, 2019

View table

Table 3. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on July 1, 2019

Mode	Single-elevation-area scanning		Multi-elevation-area scanning
Arrangement	6×1	3×2	6×1	3×2
Number of arcs	8513	8967	6092	6087
Number of pieces	1486	1526	1298	1349
Total detection time /s	286089.2	286288.2	201545.6	196110.4

Table 4. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on December 1, 2019

View table

Table 4. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on December 1, 2019

Mode	Single-elevation-area scanning		Multi-elevation-area scanning
Arrangement	6×1	3×2	6×1	3×2
Number of arcs	8481	10277	7945	7878
Number of pieces	1219	1342	1209	1303
Total detection time /s	280906.6	320303.8	254221.1	246617.4

Table 5. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on December 5, 2019

View table

Table 5. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on December 5, 2019

Mode	Single-elevation-area scanning		Multi-elevation-area scanning
Arrangement	6×1	3×2	6×1	3×2
Number of arcs	6181	7378	5915	5853
Number of pieces	1273	1463	1281	1400
Total detection time /s	204944.8	230270.5	187841.9	182389.1

Table 6. Detection results of 28 cm aperture telescope combination under different scanning methods and different arrangements
View table
Table 6. Detection results of 28 cm aperture telescope combination under different scanning methods and different arrangements
Mode Single-elevation-area scanning Multi-elevation-area scanning
Arrangement 4×1 2×2 4×1 2×2
Number of arcs 1809 1761 993 1153
Number of pieces 487 506 409 486
Total detection time /s 59184.1 57289.3 33166.0 38617.6

Table 7. Detection results of combination of telescopes with different apertures in same field of view

View table

Table 7. Detection results of combination of telescopes with different apertures in same field of view

Mode	Single-elevation-area scanning		Multi-elevation-area scanning
Arrangement	1×1	2×2	1×1	2×2
Aperture /cm	15	28	15	28
Number of arcs	1658	1761	1102	1153
Number of pieces	494	506	469	486
Total detection time /s	54139.3	57289.3	37087.6	38617.6

Table 8. Limiting size of debris detectable at different orbital heights by telescopes of different diameters
View table
Table 8. Limiting size of debris detectable at different orbital heights by telescopes of different diameters
Height /km Limiting size(15 cm) /m Limiting size (28 cm) /m
2000 0.08 0.06
20000 0.77 0.56
36000 1.38 1.00

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

Jingjing Hu, Shaoming Hu, Jing Liu, Xu Chen, Junju Du. Simulation Analysis of Space Debris Observation Capability of Multi-Optoelectronic Equipment[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2020, 40(15): 1504002

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Detectors

Received: Feb. 27, 2020

Accepted: May. 6, 2020

Published Online: Aug. 14, 2020

The Author Email: Hu Jingjing (hjj7211@163.com), Hu Shaoming (husm@sdu.edu.cn)

DOI:10.3788/AOS202040.1504002

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 1. Setting of telescope parameters and CCD parameters

Table 1. Setting of telescope parameters and CCD parameters

Table 2. Setting of simulation basic parameters

Table 2. Setting of simulation basic parameters

Table 3. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on July 1, 2019

Table 3. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on July 1, 2019

Table 4. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on December 1, 2019

Table 4. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on December 1, 2019

Table 5. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on December 5, 2019

Table 5. Detection results of 15 cm aperture telescope combination on December 5, 2019

Table 6. Detection results of 28 cm aperture telescope combination under different scanning methods and different arrangements

Table 6. Detection results of 28 cm aperture telescope combination under different scanning methods and different arrangements

Table 7. Detection results of combination of telescopes with different apertures in same field of view

Table 7. Detection results of combination of telescopes with different apertures in same field of view

Table 8. Limiting size of debris detectable at different orbital heights by telescopes of different diameters

Table 8. Limiting size of debris detectable at different orbital heights by telescopes of different diameters