Optics and Precision Engineering, Volume. 30, Issue 13, 1631(2022)

Defect detection in ceramic substrate based on improved YOLOV4

Feng GUO1, Qibing ZHU1、*, Min HUANG1, and Xiaoxiang XU2
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Advanced Process Control for Light Industry, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University, Wuxi2422, China
  • 2Wuxi CK Electric Control Equipment Co., Ltd, Wuxi14400, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(14)
    Automatic defect detecting platform for ceramic substrate
    Image processing
    Defects of ceramic substrate
    Statistical chart of sample number of defects and their size distribution
    Structure of CCNet
    Structure of YOLOV4-CS
    Convergence plot of loss function
    Local detection results of different models
    • Table 1. Size of prior boxes

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Size of prior boxes

      Feature map sizeAnchor Size
      19×19(108×121);(20×86);(113×94)
      38×38(51×49);(54×42);(36×53)
      76×76(26×24);(24×18);(22×31)
      152×152(7×9);(11×14);(16×12)
    • Table 2. Results of defect detection

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Results of defect detection

      DefectTotalCorrect detectionFalse detectionMissed detectionPrecision/%Recall/%
      Stain1 0131 0045999.599.1
      Foreign matter222200100100
      Gold edge bulge83833096.5100
      Damage18518215492.497.9
      Ceramic gap74730110098.6
      Total1 3771 364231498.399.0
    • Table 3. Defect detection results of different algorithms

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Defect detection results of different algorithms

      ModelSizePrecision/%Recall/%Times/s
      Faster R-CNN(600×600)83.382.90.217
      Efficientdet-B3(768×768)81.380.50.256
      YOLOV4(608×608)86.990.10.182
      YOLOV5(640×640)87.789.80.176
      YOLOX(640×640)85.186.50.167
      YOLOV4-CS(608×608)98.399.00.202
    • Table 4. Results of different ablation experiments

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Results of different ablation experiments

      Small scale branchCCNetGHMCPrecision/%Recall/%
      93.693.3
      90.191.2
      91.995.0
      96.794.2
      96.597.5
      95.697.9
      98.399.0
    • Table 5. Results of different kinds of attention networks

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Results of different kinds of attention networks

      Attentional mechanismsPrecision/%Recall/%Time/s
      SENet96.495.10.201
      CBAM97.597.60.227
      ECA-Net97.197.40.222
      CCNet98.399.00.202
    • Table 6. Results of different kinds of prior box

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Results of different kinds of prior box

      Prior boxPrecision/%Recall/%
      YOLOV496.396.6
      Ours98.399.0
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Feng GUO, Qibing ZHU, Min HUANG, Xiaoxiang XU. Defect detection in ceramic substrate based on improved YOLOV4[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2022, 30(13): 1631

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Information Sciences

    Received: Mar. 4, 2022

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jul. 27, 2022

    The Author Email: ZHU Qibing (zhuqib@163.com)

    DOI:10.37188/OPE.20223013.1631

    Topics