Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 41, Issue 7, 0710002(2021)

Division-of-Focal-Plane Polarization Image Denoising Algorithm Based on Improved Principal Component Analysis

Jiaqi Yin1,2,3, Shiyong Wang1,2、*, and Fanming Li1,2、**
Author Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Infrared System Detection and Imaging Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China
  • 2Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China
  • 3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(14)
    Schematic diagram of the micro-polarizer array
    Flow chart of our algorithm
    Denoising model of the DoFP polarization image
    DoFP polarization image obtained by simulation. (a) DoFP; (b) 0°; (c) 45°; (d) 90°; (e) 135°
    Test images. (a) Fabrics; (b) leaves; (c) macbeth classic; (d) macbeth enhancement; (e) painting; (f) potery
    Potery images before and after denoising. (a) Original image; (b) demosaicing image; (c) noisy image; (d) denoised image
    Denoising results under different σ. (a) PSNR; (b) SSIM
    Denoising results of different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) demosaicing image; (c) noisy image; (d) PCA algorithm; (e) K-SVD algorithm; (f) BM3D algorithm; (g) our algorithm
    Denoising results of different algorithms for image macbeth enhancement. (a) PSNR; (b) SSIM
    Denoising result of real images by different algorithms. (a) Original image; (b) non-uniformity corrected image; (c) PCA algorithm; (d) K-SVD algorithm; (e) BM3D algorithm; (f) our algorithm
    • Table 1. Stokes vector images and DoLP images before and after denoising

      View table

      Table 1. Stokes vector images and DoLP images before and after denoising

      ImageS0S1S2DoLP
      Demosaicing imagePSNR /dB46.523038.616641.695931.3399
      SSIM0.99560.95120.96450.7770
      Noisy imagePSNR /dB35.043626.151726.22775.9415
      SSIM0.81040.23880.21960.1175
      Denoised imagePSNR /dB41.407437.101839.570825.9634
      SSIM0.98090.90600.92150.5934
    • Table 2. Average running time of different algorithms

      View table

      Table 2. Average running time of different algorithms

      AlgorithmPCAK-SVDBM3DOurs
      Time /s5.924734.24110.38660.8869
    • Table 3. Denoising results of different algorithms

      View table

      Table 3. Denoising results of different algorithms

      AlgorithmFabricsLeavesMacbethclassicMacbethenhancementPaintingPotery
      Noisy imagePSNR /dB28.137928.123228.131528.144328.141228.1259
      SSIM0.67870.47590.61430.77730.76060.5223
      PCAPSNR /dB34.569337.538538.419038.119433.857037.0131
      SSIM0.90950.90110.94810.97340.93900.9124
      K-SVDPSNR /dB36.149839.027737.173737.756833.666038.0791
      SSIM0.94030.93650.90680.96080.93340.9438
      BM3DPSNR /dB33.147437.766339.379437.640432.747537.3816
      SSIM0.89370.92860.96110.96680.93160.9456
      OursPSNR /dB36.961641.559243.743442.595735.216440.3545
      SSIM0.95430.97780.99000.99400.96260.9826
    • Table 4. Denoising results of different algorithms on macbeth enhancement images

      View table

      Table 4. Denoising results of different algorithms on macbeth enhancement images

      AlgorithmS0S1S2DoLP
      DemosaicingPSNR /dB49.405541.960043.429133.9477
      SSIM0.99750.96000.98160.8999
      Noisy imagePSNR /dB35.173626.230126.268311.8090
      SSIM0.82350.29480.37270.1553
      PCAPSNR /dB41.897935.696435.683318.5476
      SSIM0.97230.81110.85400.4134
      K-SVDPSNR /dB41.685234.818333.676912.9843
      SSIM0.97440.78150.81420.4154
      BM3DPSNR /dB40.954936.500135.729320.7019
      SSIM0.96890.87200.89020.5247
      OursPSNR /dB43.084439.969839.613927.0429
      SSIM0.98470.93050.95270.7623
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jiaqi Yin, Shiyong Wang, Fanming Li. Division-of-Focal-Plane Polarization Image Denoising Algorithm Based on Improved Principal Component Analysis[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2021, 41(7): 0710002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Image Processing

    Received: Sep. 30, 2020

    Accepted: Nov. 11, 2020

    Published Online: Apr. 11, 2021

    The Author Email: Wang Shiyong (wangshiyong@mail.sitp.ac.cn), Li Fanming (lfmjws@163.com)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202141.0710002

    Topics