Acta Optica Sinica, Volume. 42, Issue 24, 2401005(2022)

On-Orbit SNR Evaluation of Polarized Scanning Atmospheric Corrector Onboard HJ-2 Satellites

Hao Dong1,2,3, Zhenhai Liu1,3、*, Xinxin Zhao1,2,3, Xuefeng Lei1,2,3, Fei Tao1,3, Yuheng Chu1,3, Peng Zou1,3, Maoxin Song1,3, Qiang Cong4, and Jin Hong1,3
Author Affiliations
  • 1Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui , China
  • 2University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui , China
  • 3Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui , China
  • 4DFH Satellite Co., Ltd., Beijing 100094, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(14)
    PSAC main structure[23]
    Schematic of PSAC scanning observation
    Radiation calibrator structure diagram. (a) Solar diffuser; (b) calibrator module
    Photo of model parameter acquisition in laboratory
    Signal-total noise power linear fitting curves. (a) 865 nm band; (b) 1610 nm band
    PSAC on-orbit SNRs evaluation results under different radiances
    Solar diffuser sampling points response in a single scanning
    Multiple observation solar diffuser responses of one sampling point and fitting residuals. (a) 865 nm band; (b) 1610 nm band
    Comparison of two SNR conversion results. (a) 443 nm band; (b) 555 nm band
    SNR estimation error caused by C0 change
    • Table 1. Main specifications of PSAC

      View table

      Table 1. Main specifications of PSAC

      ParameterValue
      Swath /km≥800
      Instantaneous field-of-view(IFOV)/(°)0.52
      Resolution at nadir /km≤6@645 km
      Band /nm410,443,555,670,865,910,1380,1610,2250
      Polarization detection angle /(°)0,45,90,135
      Effective quantization bits /bit15
      Signal-to-noise ratio(SNR)/dB41-45@Ltyp
      Average dark counts for all channels /DN[-30,30]
      Radiometric calibration accuracy /%≤5
      Polarimetric calibration accuracy /%≤0.5 P<0.3)
    • Table 2. Performance parameters of integrating sphere

      View table

      Table 2. Performance parameters of integrating sphere

      ParameterValue
      Band range /nm350-2500
      Opening diameter /mm120
      Stability /(%·h-10.2
    • Table 3. Evaluation results of PSAC SNRs under typical radiance

      View table

      Table 3. Evaluation results of PSAC SNRs under typical radiance

      Band /nmTypical radiance Ltyp /(W·m-2·μm-1·sr-1Absolute radiation response coefficient C0 /(W·m-2·μm-1·sr-1SNR specification RSNspe /dBSNR calculated by model RSN dB /dB
      443387.98.00×10-34569.94
      555371.58.14×10-34572.07
      670293.46.07×10-34571.21
      865187.23.95×10-34574.92
      161045.49.39×10-44575.19
    • Table 4. Comparison of results of two SNR evaluation methods

      View table

      Table 4. Comparison of results of two SNR evaluation methods

      Band /nm

      Model

      parameter A

      Dark

      noise

      power

      σdark2

      Mean value

      of solar

      diffuser

      response

      D¯

      Total noise

      power based on

      model σtotal2

      Total noise

      power based

      on solar

      diffuser

      σtotal,SD2

      SNR based

      on model

      SNR based

      on solar

      diffuser

      Relative

      deviation /%

      4431.34×10-326.992156755.8955.212884.842902.56-0.62
      5557.92×10-414.272344332.8235.074092.073958.733.36
      6707.64×10-425.652503344.7747.543741.273630.643.03
      8655.36×10-45.412255717.4918.835393.695197.963.75
      16106.41×10-42.162110715.6817.725330.325014.126.27
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Hao Dong, Zhenhai Liu, Xinxin Zhao, Xuefeng Lei, Fei Tao, Yuheng Chu, Peng Zou, Maoxin Song, Qiang Cong, Jin Hong. On-Orbit SNR Evaluation of Polarized Scanning Atmospheric Corrector Onboard HJ-2 Satellites[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2022, 42(24): 2401005

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Atmospheric Optics and Oceanic Optics

    Received: May. 13, 2022

    Accepted: Jun. 28, 2022

    Published Online: Dec. 14, 2022

    The Author Email: Liu Zhenhai (lzhenhai@aiofm.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3788/AOS202242.2401005

    Topics