Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 51, Issue 6, 20210458(2022)

Accuracy optimization and assessment of GF-7 satellite multi-source remote sensing data

Liuru Hu1, Xinming Tang2, Zhi Zhang1, Guoyuan Li2, Jiyi Chen2, Huaiqi Tian1, Shuaitai Zhang2,3, Junping Qiao1, and Xin Li1
Author Affiliations
  • 1The First Topographic Surveying Brigade of Ministry of Natural Resources of the People’s Republic of China, Xi’an 710054, China
  • 2Land Satellite Remote Sensing Application Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100048, China
  • 3Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(12)
    Technical process of GF-7 satellite multi-source remote sensing data elevation and plane control
    Distribution of field inspection points
    Distribution of 21 field inspection points
    Distribution of laser detection point
    Distribution of footprint image feature points
    • Table 1. Statistical table of laser spot accuracy detection classification

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Statistical table of laser spot accuracy detection classification

      ItemdH1 dH2 dH3 N
      ME/mRMSE/mME/mRMSE/mME/mRMSE/m
      Total0.8722.2080.8862.2430.9132.27479
      m_ECP_Flag=10.3270.6570.2630.5830.2700.56626
      m_ECP_Flag=20.3150.3920.3210.4010.3780.46026
      m_ECP_Flag=other1.9343.7012.0403.7962.0563.84727
    • Table 2. Statistical table of planar error of footprint image

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Statistical table of planar error of footprint image

      ItemME/mRMSE/mMAX/mMIN/m
      East-West3.5364.3478.271−1.605
      North-South−0.8592.2505.795−5.163
      Plane4.3634.8958.5230.569
    • Table 3. Plane-elevation accuracy evaluation of uncontrolled DSM and DOM

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Plane-elevation accuracy evaluation of uncontrolled DSM and DOM

      ItemME/mRMSE/mAbs MAX/mAbs MIN/m
      Elevation−4.2684.5186.9211.031
      Plane13.60613.62615.96212.049
    • Table 4. Statistical table preliminary evaluation of uncontrolled DSM by laser data

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Statistical table preliminary evaluation of uncontrolled DSM by laser data

      ItemME/mRMSE/mAbs MAX/mAbs MIN/mSkewness/m
      Statistical result−3.8784.0856.0620.24650
      ItemPNPME/mNNNME/mN
      Statistical result11.27249−3.98450
    • Table 5. Statistical table of accuracy evaluation by laser elevation optimization

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Statistical table of accuracy evaluation by laser elevation optimization

      ItemME/mRMSE/mAbs MAX/mAbs MIN/m
      Skewness−0.3891.5493.0430.117
      Median−0.2721.5082.9650.001
      Linear polynomial−0.3201.3512.9370.028
      Quadratic polynomial−0.6101.7513.2080.177
    • Table 6. Statistical table of accuracy evaluation by footprint-laser plane-elevation optimization

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Statistical table of accuracy evaluation by footprint-laser plane-elevation optimization

      ItemME/mRMSE/mAbs MAX/mAbs MIN/m
      Plane5.3415.4958.2443.388
      Elevation of plane optimization−4.3344.600−1.031−6.921
      Elevation of skewness optimization−0.3911.2732.4160.034
      Elevation of median optimization−0.3051.2502.3300.009
      Elevation of linear polynomial optimization−0.3351.1311.7510.004
      Elevation of quadratic polynomial optimization−0.5401.4272.4080.054
    • Table 7. Statistical table of accuracy evaluation by field-laser plane-elevation optimization

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7. Statistical table of accuracy evaluation by field-laser plane-elevation optimization

      ItemME/mRMSE/mAbs MAX/mAbs MIN/m
      Plane3.1743.2994.9201.669
      Elevation of plane optimization−4.2494.4326.3511.943
      Elevation of skewness optimization−0.3381.3072.4410.047
      Elevation of median optimization−0.2911.2952.3930.095
      Elevation of linear polynomial optimization−0.2791.1601.9550.0025
      Elevation of quadratic polynomial optimization−0.4841.4292.2690.002
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Liuru Hu, Xinming Tang, Zhi Zhang, Guoyuan Li, Jiyi Chen, Huaiqi Tian, Shuaitai Zhang, Junping Qiao, Xin Li. Accuracy optimization and assessment of GF-7 satellite multi-source remote sensing data[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2022, 51(6): 20210458

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Lasers & Laser optics

    Received: Jul. 6, 2021

    Accepted: Nov. 2, 2021

    Published Online: Dec. 20, 2022

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/IRLA20210458

    Topics