Microelectronics, Volume. 52, Issue 6, 1001(2022)

A 32×32 HgCdTe-APD Array-Based ROIC for Passive and Active Imaging

ZHAO Yunlong1...2, CHEN Honglei1 and DING Ruijun1 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1[in Chinese]
  • 2[in Chinese]
  • show less
    References(20)

    [1] [1] PAWLIKOWSKA A M, HALIMI A, LAMB R A, et al. Single photon three-dimensional imaging at up to 10 kilometers range [J]. Opt Expr, 2017, 25(10): 11919-11931.

    [2] [2] KONG H J, KIM T H, JO S E, et al. Smart three-dimensional imaging ladar using two Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes [J]. Opt Expr, 2011, 19(20): 19323-19329.

    [3] [3] CHENG Y, CAO J, ZHANG F, et al. Design and modeling of pulsed laser three-dimensional imaging system inspired by compound and human hybrid eye [J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 1-13.

    [4] [4] LUDWIG D, KONGABLE A,ALBRECHT H T, et al. Identifying targets under trees: jigsaw 3D ladar test results [J]. Proceed SPIE, 2003, 5086: 16-26.

    [5] [5] WEBER J R. The effects of different shape-based metrics on the identification of military targets from 3D ladar data. [J]. Three-Dimensional Image Capture and Applic VII, 2006, 6056: 60560H-60560H-11.

    [6] [6] HAMMER M, HEBEL M, ARENS M, et al. Automated object detection and tracking with a flash LiDAR system. [J]. Proceed SPIE, 2016, 9988: 998803-998803-7.

    [7] [7] LI Y, LUO X, LIANG G, et al. Demonstration of Ge/Si avalanche photodetector arrays for Lidar application [C]// Opt Fiber Commun Conf. 2019: 1-3.

    [8] [8] HUANG H, JIN L. Receiver performance and detection statistics of single photon Lidar [J]. IET Radar Sonar Navigation, 2020, 14(1): 105-109.

    [9] [9] ULLRICH A, PFENNIGBAUER M.Linear Lidar versus Geiger-mode LIDAR: impact on data properties and data quality [J]. Proceed SPIE, 2016, 9832: 983204-983204-17.

    [10] [10] MCMANAMON P F, BANKS P, BECK J, et al. Comparison of flash Lidar detector options [J]. Opt Engineer, 2017, 56(3): 031223.

    [11] [11] FIGER D F, HANOLD B J, AULL B F, et al. A photon- counting detector for exoplanet missions [J]. Proceed SPIE, 2011, 8151(22): 81510K.

    [12] [12] AULL B F, SCHUETTE D R, YOUNG D J, et al. A study of crosstalk in a 256×256 photon counting imager based on silicon Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes [J]. IEEE Sensors J, 2015, 15(4): 2123-2132.

    [13] [13] AULL B F, DUERR E, FRECHETTE J, et al. Large- format Geiger-mode avalanche photodiode arrays and readout circuits [J]. IEEE J Selected Topics in Quantum Elec, 2018, 24(2): 1-10.

    [14] [14] VERGHESE S, MCINTOSH K A, DONNELLY J P, et al. Arrays of 128×32 InP-based Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes [J]. Proceed SPIE, 2009, 7320: 73200M- 3200M-8.

    [15] [15] AULL B. Geiger-mode avalanche photodiode arrays integrated to all-digital CMOS circuits [J]. Sensors, 2016, 16(4): 495.

    [16] [16] SUN J, JIANG P, ZHANG X, et al. Experimental research of 32×32 InGaAs Gm-APD arrays laser active imaging [J]. Infrared Laser and Engineer, 2016, 45(12): 82-86.

    [17] [17] JO S E, KONG H J, KIM T H, et al. A modified ladar system with a Geiger mode APD to remove a dead time problem [J]. Proceed SPIE, 2012, 8379: 83791A- 83791A-6.

    [18] [18] BETH A S, BRADLEY W S, TYLER N B, et al. Global shutter solid state flash Lidar for spacecraft navigation and docking applications [J]. Proceed SPIE, 2019, 11005: 110050W-10050W-12.

    [19] [19] VINCENT E R, FARZIN A, ALEXANDER E B, et al. 3D flash Lidar performance in flight testing on the Morpheus autonomous, rocket propelled lander to a lunar-like hazard field [J]. Proceed SPIE, 2016, 9832: 983209-983209-20.

    [20] [20] VICTOR E S P, ERIC D B, REGIS P, et al. Time-of- flight calibration of an MCT-APD sensor for a flash imaging LiDAR system [J]. Proceed SPIE, 2019, 11180: 111802K-11802K-7.

    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    ZHAO Yunlong, CHEN Honglei, DING Ruijun. A 32×32 HgCdTe-APD Array-Based ROIC for Passive and Active Imaging[J]. Microelectronics, 2022, 52(6): 1001

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Dec. 10, 2021

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Mar. 11, 2023

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.13911/j.cnki.1004-3365.210479

    Topics