Chinese Optics Letters, Volume. 23, Issue 3, 032702(2025)
Integration of classical communication and quantum key distribution using frequency division multiplexing
Fig. 1. Experimental setup. (a) The detailed structure of the experimental system which consists of four main parts. AWG, arbitrary waveform generator; IQM, IQ modulator; VOA, variable optical attenuator; BS, beam splitter; BHD, balanced homodyne detector; OSC, oscilloscope. (b) The signal loaded into the two channels of the AWG, each of which is a combination of the classical signal and the quantum signal. The blue line represents the classical (QPSK) signal, and the orange line represents the quantum (GMCS-CVQKD) signal.
Fig. 2. Relation between frequency interval Δf and frequency division noise εF under different amplitude ratios n. Parameters are set as a = 9.432 × 1099 and b = −12.79. It describes the change of frequency division noise at different frequency intervals and different amplitude ratios.
Fig. 3. The constellation diagram of the classical signal and the quantum signal. There are 10,000 samples in the quantum signal constellation, while the four branches of the classical signal add up to 10,000 samples. This explains why the GMCS constellation looks denser than the QPSK one.
Fig. 4. Power spectrum diagram of the original signal received by Bob. The peak at 100 MHz is the classical signal and the peak at 500 MHz is the quantum signal.
Fig. 5. (a) The excess noise and secret key rate of the quantum signal. (b) The bit error rate and bit rate of the classical signal.
|
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Yunyu Shao, Ziyi Shen, Yuehan Xu, Lang Li, Zicong Tan, Xiaojuan Liao, Peng Huang, Tao Wang, Guihua Zeng, "Integration of classical communication and quantum key distribution using frequency division multiplexing," Chin. Opt. Lett. 23, 032702 (2025)
Category: Quantum Optics and Quantum Information
Received: Jul. 6, 2024
Accepted: Sep. 20, 2024
Posted: Sep. 20, 2024
Published Online: Mar. 26, 2025
The Author Email: Tao Wang (tonystar@sjtu.edu.cn)