Infrared and Laser Engineering, Volume. 50, Issue 8, 20200363(2021)

Method of inverting wavefront phase from far-field spot based on deep learning

Yang Zhang... Yulong He, Yu Ning, Quan Sun, Jun Li and Xiaojun Xu |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(14)
    Distribution of sub-aperture spot of different laser beams on the target of Shack-Hartmann-wavefront sensor. (a) slab laser beam cleanup; (b) DF chemical laser beam cleanup不同激光束在夏克哈特曼波前传感器的子孔径光斑分布。(a) 板条激光器光束净化;(b) DF化学激光器光束净化
    ResNet-50 architecture to estimate Zernike coefficients. (a) Composition of the network; (b) Structure of residual block
    Schematic diagram of intensity distribution-based wavefront phase sensing with deep learning
    Wavefront aberration and correction result of a simulation data. (a) Input wavefront; (b) Reconstructed wavefront; (c) Residual wavefront after correction; (d) Intensity distribution of input; (e) Intensity distribution of reconstructed; (f) Comparison of actual Zernike coefficients and predict Zernike coefficients
    Turbulence phase screen and corresponding Hartmann detector sub-aperture spot distribution
    Structure of the optical system used in the experiment. Zernike coefficients and the corresponding far-field images are recorded by HSWFS and two CCDs
    Wavefront aberration and correction result of a experiment data. (a) Input wavefront; (b) Reconstructed wavefront; (c) Residual wavefront; (d) Intensity distribution of input; (e) Intensity distribution of reconstructed; (f) Comparison of actual Zernike coefficients and predict Zernike coefficients
    RMS of 1000 groups of verification data
    RMS of the Zernike coefficient (the piston and tilt terms excepted)
    • Table 1. Training result of the simulation data

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Training result of the simulation data

      ZernikeRMS (input)RMS (residual)Mean predict time/msTraining time/min
      *Intel i7-8700 CPU, NVIDIA GTX-2080 GPU
      150.1425λ0.0243λ1.53190
      210.2010λ0.0353λ1.51191
      280.2523λ0.0320λ1.50190
      360.3093λ0.0599λ1.52191
      450.3569λ0.0808λ1.52192
      550.3976λ0.0906λ1.50191
      660.4194λ0.1075λ1.51191
    • Table 2. Training results with different noise

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Training results with different noise

      ItemRMS (input)RMS (residual)
      Original image0.1425λ0.0243λ
      Gaussian noise0.1425λ0.0367λ
      Poisson noise0.1425λ0.0329λ
    • Table 3. Training results with different aberration

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Training results with different aberration

      No.RMS (input)RMS (residual)
      10.1719λ0.0292λ
      20.3398λ0.0542λ
      30.5076λ0.0711λ
      40.6847λ0.0828λ
    • Table 4. Training results with different low-light areas

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Training results with different low-light areas

      Fig.5RMS (input)RMS (residual)
      (a)0.1498λ0.0400λ
      (b)0.1498λ0.0376λ
      (c)0.1498λ0.0339λ
    • Table 5. Training result of the experimental data

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Training result of the experimental data

      ZernikeRMS (input)RMS (residual)Mean predict time/msTraining time/min
      150.52λ0.08λ1.67201
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yang Zhang, Yulong He, Yu Ning, Quan Sun, Jun Li, Xiaojun Xu. Method of inverting wavefront phase from far-field spot based on deep learning[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2021, 50(8): 20200363

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Optical design

    Received: Sep. 20, 2020

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Nov. 2, 2021

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/IRLA20200363

    Topics