Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, Volume. 18, Issue 4, 295(2023)

Engineering design and in-orbit performance evaluation of polarization crossfire suite onboard the hyperspectral observation satellite

ZHANG Miaomiao1... WEN Yuan1, ZHU Sifeng1, XIE Yanqing1, LI Yingjie1, LI Yunduan1, HONG Jin2,*, LIU Zhenhai2, LUO Donggen2, SONG Maoxin2 and WANG Yi2 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Shanghai Institute of Satellite Engineering, Shanghai 201109, China
  • 2Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Hefei 230031, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(16)
    Payloads configuration of hyperspectral observation satellite[16]
    Schematic diagram of the working principle of polarization crossfire[3]
    Schematic diagram of second pulse timing implementation scheme
    Synchronization control schematic diagram of DPC and POSP
    DPC motor control sequence
    Results of synchronous observation and acquisition time difference in orbit
    Heat map of correlation between DPC and POSP field of view matching at different pixel positions in DPC
    In-orbit cross-calibration results of DPC and POSP of the hyperspectral observation satellite.(a) 443 nm; (b) 490 nm; (c) 670 nm; (d) 865 nm
    Linear fitting and statistical distribution results of polarization of DPC and POSP[12]. (a) 490 nm; (b) 670 nm; (c) 865 nm
    • Table 1. Major specifications of DPC

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Major specifications of DPC

      ParameterSpecifications
      Spectrum/nm

      433~453, 480~500 (P), 555~575, 660~680 (P),

      758~768, 745~785, 845~885 (P), 900~920

      Polarization Angle/(°)0, 60, 120
      Total field of view/(°)-50~+50
      Measured signal-to-noise ratio≥ 500
      Multi-angle observation≥ 15
      Spatial resolution/km≤ 3.5
      Radiometric calibration error/%≤ 5
      Polarimetric error/%≤ 2
    • Table 2. Major specifications of POSP

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Major specifications of POSP

      ParameterSpecifications
      Spectrum/nm

      370~390 (P), 400~420 (P), 433~453 (P), 480~500 (P), 660~680 (P), 845~885 (P),

      1360~1400 (P), 1580~1640 (P), 2210~2290 (P)

      Polarization angle/(°)0, 45, 90, 135
      Total field of view/(°)-50~+50
      Measured signal-to-noise ratio

      ≥ 300 (@380, 410, 1380, 2250 nm)

      ≥ 550 (@443, 490, 670, 865, 1610 nm)

      Spatial resolution/km≤ 6.41
      Radiometric calibration error/%≤ 5
      Polarimetric error/%≤ 0.5
    • Table 3. Comparison of detection abilities between DPC and POSP

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison of detection abilities between DPC and POSP

      Detection abilityDPCPOSP
      Spatial coverage/km18501850
      Spatial resolution/km3.56.4
      Spectral coverageOnly visible and near-infraredVisible to short-wave infrared
      Multi-angle detection151
      On-board calibratorsNoRadiation and polarization calibrators
      Polarimetric accuracy/%20.5
    • Table 4. Comparison of spectral characteristics between DPC and POSP

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Comparison of spectral characteristics between DPC and POSP

      NumberPOSPDPC
      Central wavelength/nmSpectral bandwidth/nmCentral wavelength/nmSpectral bandwidth/nm
      138020
      241020
      34432044320
      44902049020
      556520
      66702067020
      776310
      876540
      98654086540
      1091020
      11138040
      12161060
      13225080
    • Table 5. Spectral channel acquisition matching table

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Spectral channel acquisition matching table

      DPC runner sequenceDPC channelPOSP detectionDPC runner sequenceDPC channelPOSP detection
      Lap 1.-Channel 1490P1Lap 2.-Channel 1490P1-No imagingNadir imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 2490P2Nadir imagingLap 2.-Channel 2490P2-No imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 3490P3Lap 2.-Channel 3490P3-No imagingNadir imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 4565Nadir imagingLap 2.-Channel 4565-No imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 5670P1Lap 2.-Channel 5670P1-No imagingNadir imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 6670P2Nadir imagingLap 2.-Channel 6670P2-No imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 7670P3Lap 2.-Channel 7670P3-No imagingNadir imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 8DarkNadir imagingLap 2.-Channel 8Dark-No imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 9763Lap 2.-Channel 9763-No imagingNadir imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 10765Nadir imagingLap 2.-Channel 10765-No imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 11865P1Lap 2.-Channel 11865P1-No imagingNadir imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 12865P2Nadir imagingLap 2.-Channel 12865P2-No imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 13865P3Lap 2.-Channel 13865P3-No imagingNadir imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 14443Nadir imagingLap 2.-Channel 14443-No imaging
      Lap 1.-Channel 15910Lap 2.-Channel 15910-No imagingNadir imaging
    • Table 6. In-orbit requirements and test results of DPC

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. In-orbit requirements and test results of DPC

      ItemsSpecification requirementsTest results
      Spectral range/nm433~453, 480~500 (P), 555~575, 660~680 (P), 758~768, 745~785, 845~885 (P), 900~920442.50 ± 21, 489.90 ± 22.4 (P), 563.10 ± 21.6, 669.45 ± 20.6 (P), 763.25 ± 10.23, 763 ± 41, 863.50 ± 35.2 (P), 909.40 ± 21.8
      SNR≥ 500568.3~717.9

      Polarimetric

      error/%

      ≤ 2≤ 0.62

      Radiometric

      calibration/%

      ≤ 52.3~4.7
      FOV/(°)50 ± 0.5~50 ± 0.5±50.07
      Spatial resolution at nadir/km< 3.5≤ 3.32
    • Table 7. In-orbit requirements and test results of POSP

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7. In-orbit requirements and test results of POSP

      ItemsSpecification requirementsTest results
      Spectral range/nm

      370 ± 3~390 ± 3, 400 ± 3~420 ± 3, 433 ± 3~453 ± 3,

      480 ± 3~500 ± 3, 660 ± 5~680 ± 5, 845 ± 5~885 ± 5

      1360 ± 5~1400 ± 5, 1580 ± 5~1640 ± 5,

      2210 ± 10~2290 ± 10

      380 ± 19, 409.5 ± 19, 442 ± 19

      489.5 ± 20, 669.5 ± 19, 865.25 ± 19, 1378.5 ± 41, 1612 ± 62, 2256 ± 70

      SNR

      > 100 (@380, 410, 1380, 2250 nm)

      > 240 (@443, 490, 670, 865, 1610 nm)

      ≥ 594.73 (@380, 410, 1380, 2250 nm)

      ≥ 1346.07 (@443, 490, 670, 865, 1610 nm)

      Polarimetric error≤ 0.005@P ≤ 0.3≤ 0.004@P ≤ 0.3
      Radiometric calibration error/%≤ 5≤ 4.42
      FOV/(°)≥ ±50°≥ ±53.6
      Spatial resolution at nadir/km≤ 10≤ 6.41
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Miaomiao ZHANG, Yuan WEN, Sifeng ZHU, Yanqing XIE, Yingjie LI, Yunduan LI, Jin HONG, Zhenhai LIU, Donggen LUO, Maoxin SONG, Yi WANG. Engineering design and in-orbit performance evaluation of polarization crossfire suite onboard the hyperspectral observation satellite[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Environmental Optics, 2023, 18(4): 295

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Mar. 17, 2023

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Aug. 24, 2023

    The Author Email: HONG Jin (hongjin@aiofm.ac.cn)

    DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-6141.2023.04.004

    Topics