High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume. 1, Issue 1, 01000002(2013)

Laser requirements for a laser fusion energy power plant

Stephen E. Bodner1、*, Andrew J. Schmitt2, and John D. Sethian2
Author Affiliations
  • 1550 Carolina Meadows Villas, Chapel Hill, NC 27517, United States
  • 2Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington DC 20375, United States
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(5)
    Section of generic high-gain laser fusion spherical target design.
    Predicted target energy gains versus incident laser energy for several designs. Shock-ignition gains are similar to fast-ignition target gains, and KrF lasers have superior performance due to their shorter laser wavelength and the ability to reduce the focal spot size to match the imploding target.
    Generic laser pulse shape for the shock-ignition target. The prepulse sets the initial radial adiabat. The main pulse compresses the cold fuel. The ignitor pulse produces the spark for ignition. The conventional direct-drive target pulse shape is similar except without the final ignitor pulse.
    Naval Research Laboratory’s electron beam pumped Electra KrF laser system. The laser output window is between the two black magnet coils in the center of the photo. The arrow shows the laser path. The magnets guide the electron beams into the laser gas. The pulsed power systems for the electron beams consist of the blue pulse forming lines and the two white tanks that flank the laser cell.
    • Table 1. Comparison of target performances for a shock-ignition target driven by the two types of laser, with the same ablation pressure, and similar fuel mass and thermonuclear yields. For the DPSSL, with its poorer laser–target coupling, the target energy gain drops significantly and the possible deleterious effects of laser–plasma instabilities increase significantly

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Comparison of target performances for a shock-ignition target driven by the two types of laser, with the same ablation pressure, and similar fuel mass and thermonuclear yields. For the DPSSL, with its poorer laser–target coupling, the target energy gain drops significantly and the possible deleterious effects of laser–plasma instabilities increase significantly

      KrF laserDPSSLDPSSL
      $0. 25~\mathrm{\mu} \mathrm{m} $$0. 35~\mathrm{\mu} \mathrm{m} $$0. 35~\mathrm{\mu} \mathrm{m} $
      with zoomwith zoomno zoom
      Yield (MJ)22.324.122.6
      Incident laser energy (kJ)230430645
      Laser absorption77%56%39%
      Target energy gain975635
      Maximum intensity $I~(\times 1{0}^{15} ~\mathrm{W} / {\mathrm{cm} }^{2} )$16.32821.8
      Maximum $I{\lambda }^{2} ~(\times 1{0}^{15} ~\mathrm{W} ~\mathrm{\mu} {\mathrm{m} }^{2} / {\mathrm{cm} }^{2} )$1.023.432.67
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Stephen E. Bodner, Andrew J. Schmitt, John D. Sethian. Laser requirements for a laser fusion energy power plant[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2013, 1(1): 01000002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: review

    Received: Aug. 27, 2012

    Accepted: Oct. 8, 2012

    Published Online: Jul. 17, 2013

    The Author Email: Stephen E. Bodner (bodners@icloud.com)

    DOI:10.1017/hpl.2013.1

    Topics