Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, Volume. 41, Issue 3, 787(2022)
Experimental Study on Fluidity Optimization of 3D Printing Gypsum Powder Based on Response Surface Method
[1] [1] MACDONALD E, WICKER R. Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality[J]. Science, 2016, 353(6307): aaf2093.
[4] [4] INGAGLIO J, FOX J, NAITO C J, et al. Material characteristics of binder jet 3D printed hydrated CSA cement with the addition of fine aggregates[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 206: 494-503.
[5] [5] FONSECA COELHO A W, DA SILVA MOREIRA THIR R M, ARAUJO A C. Manufacturing of gypsum-sisal fiber composites using binder jetting[J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2019, 29: 100789.
[6] [6] ZIAEE M, CRANE N B. Binder jetting: a review of process, materials, and methods[J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2019, 28: 781-801.
[7] [7] SHAKOR P, NEJADI S, PAUL G, et al. Dimensional accuracy, flowability, wettability, and porosity in inkjet 3DP for gypsum and cement mortar materials[J]. Automation in Construction, 2020, 110: 102964.
[8] [8] CHRIST S, SCHNABEL M, VORNDRAN E, et al. Fiber reinforcement during 3D printing[J]. Materials Letters, 2015, 139: 165-168.
[9] [9] MA B G, JIANG Q, HUANG J, et al. Effect of different silica particles on flowability of gypsum powder for 3D powder printing[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2019, 217: 394-402.
[10] [10] ASLAN R, TURAN O. Gypsum-based sound absorber produced by 3D printing technology[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2020, 161: 107162.
[11] [11] UTELA B, STORTI D, ANDERSON R, et al. A review of process development steps for new material systems in three dimensional printing (3DP)[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2008, 10(2): 96-104.
[12] [12] KHANNIRI E, YOUSEFI M, MORTAZAVIAN A M, et al. Effective removal of lead (Ⅱ) using chitosan and microbial adsorbents: response surface methodology (RSM)[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2021, 178: 53-62.
[13] [13] SHAH R B, TAWAKKUL M A, KHAN M A. Comparative evaluation of flow for pharmaceutical powders and granules[J]. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2008, 9(1): 250-258.
[14] [14] GELDART D, ABDULLAH E C, HASSANPOUR A, et al. Characterization of powder flowability using measurement of angle of repose[J]. China Particuology, 2006, 4(3/4): 104-107.
[15] [15] GARCIA M A V T, GARCIA C F, FARACO A A G. Pharmaceutical and biomedical applications of native and modified starch: a review[J]. Starch-Strke, 2020, 72(7/8): 1900270.
[16] [16] KHAN A, DO J, KIM D. Cost effective optimal mix proportioning of high strength self compacting concrete using response surface methodology[J]. Computers and Concrete, 2016, 17(5): 629-638.
[17] [17] ZHANG Q Y, FENG X J, CHEN X D, et al. Mix design for recycled aggregate pervious concrete based on response surface methodology[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 259: 119776.
[18] [18] MULLER A K, RUPPEL J, DREXEL C P, et al. Precipitated silica as flow regulator[J]. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2008, 34(4/5): 303-308.
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
LU Yuanjing, WEI Yongqi, ZHOU Shuangxi, WEI Xing, YAO Wu, YU Lehua. Experimental Study on Fluidity Optimization of 3D Printing Gypsum Powder Based on Response Surface Method[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society, 2022, 41(3): 787
Category:
Received: Nov. 22, 2021
Accepted: --
Published Online: Aug. 3, 2022
The Author Email: Yuanjing LU (1020331261@qq.com)
CSTR:32186.14.