Photonics Research, Volume. 4, Issue 2, 0035(2016)

Periodic structural defects in Bragg gratings and their application in multiwavelength devices

Rulei Xiao, Yuechun Shi*, Renjia Guo, Ting Chen, Lijun Hao, and Xiangfei Chen
Author Affiliations
  • National Laboratory of Solid State Microstructures, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, and College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    (a) Schematic and (b) transmission spectra of the uniform Bragg grating with PSDs and without PSDs.
    2D transmission spectra when the relative defect size is changed from −0.5 to 0.5.
    2D transmission spectra when the period of defects is changed from 1.0 to 10 μm.
    (a) Bragg wavelengths of 0 and ±1-order subgratings and (b) the RGS of each order subgrating versus the relative defect size.
    Comparison of the actual fabrication patterns utilized in an eight-wavelength grating array without PSDs and with PSDs.
    (a) Transmission spectra of the PSD-based eight-wavelength π-phase-shifted Bragg grating array whose parameters are given in Table 2, and (b) the influence of the DSE.
    RGS versus occupation ratio of the grating-stitched method. A schematic of a sample unit of the stitched grating is shown in the inset.
    Lasing spectrum, power [inset (I)], and gain [inset (II)] distribution along the cavity of DFB lasers with PSDs and without PSDs.
    • Table 1. Parameters in TMM Calculation

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Parameters in TMM Calculation

      Parameter (Symbol)Value
      Waveguide width (w)1 μm
      Waveguide height (h)0.4 μm
      Grating depth (d)10 nm
      Total length (L)300 μm
      Grating period (Λ)238 nm
      Filling factor (r)0.5
      Waveguide refractive index (n2)3.4
      Cladding refractive index (n1)3.1
      Defect size (D)59.5 nm
      Period of defects (P)4.5 μm
    • Table 2. Periods of Defects for Eight-Wavelength π-Phase-Shifted Bragg Grating Array

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Periods of Defects for Eight-Wavelength π-Phase-Shifted Bragg Grating Array

      Period of Defects (μm)Bragg Wavelength (nm)Equivalent Grating Period (nm)
      7.7401535.0239.84
      7.2521535.8239.97
      6.8231536.6240.09
      6.4421537.4240.22
      6.1021538.2240.34
      5.7961539.0240.47
      5.5191539.8240.59
      5.2681540.6240.72
    • Table 3. Modeling Laser Parameters

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Modeling Laser Parameters

      Parameter (Symbol)Value
      Cavity length (L)400 μm
      Grating period without PSDs (Λ)241 nm
      Grating period with PSDs (Λ0)238 nm
      Defect size (D)59.5 nm
      Period of defects (P)4.78 μm
      Active layer width (w)1.5 μm
      Active layer thickness (d)0.12 μm
      Optical confinement factor (Γ)0.3
      Effective refractive index3.2
      at bias current (neff)
      Group refractive index (ng)3.7
      Refractive index modulation (Δn0)0.003
      Filling factor (r)0.5
      Internal loss (α)4×103  m1
      Spontaneous emission rate (τ1)2.5×1010  s1
      Bimolecular recombination1×1016  m3s1
      coefficient (B)
      Auger recombination coefficient (C)3×1041  m6s1
      Transparent carrier density (N0)1.2×1024  m3
      Linear gain coefficient (a)2.7×1020  m2
      Linewidth enhancement factor (βC)1.5
      Bias current (IB)20 mA
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Rulei Xiao, Yuechun Shi, Renjia Guo, Ting Chen, Lijun Hao, Xiangfei Chen. Periodic structural defects in Bragg gratings and their application in multiwavelength devices[J]. Photonics Research, 2016, 4(2): 0035

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Received: Nov. 9, 2015

    Accepted: Jan. 6, 2016

    Published Online: Sep. 28, 2016

    The Author Email: Yuechun Shi (shiyc@nju.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.1364/prj.4.000035

    Topics