Acta Photonica Sinica, Volume. 50, Issue 2, 103(2021)

Greedy Unsupervised Hyperspectral Image Band Selection Method Based on Variable Precision Rough Set

Jing CHEN and Zhenxing ZHANG
Author Affiliations
  • College of Information and Electrical Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong264000, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(13)
    Hyperspectral Botswana image and its reference map
    Hyperspectral KSC image and its reference map
    Hyperspectral Indian Pine image and its reference map
    Comparison of average total classification accuracy
    Classification and comparison results of 20 band IP data sets (β = 0.1)
    Parameter sensitivity comparison of traditional VPRS
    Parameter sensitivity comparison of proposed method
    Accuracy of classification results generated by different sample numbers
    • Table 1. Comparison of classification performance of Botswana dataset

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Comparison of classification performance of Botswana dataset

      Number of

      bands

      Proposed

      method(β=0.1)

      SVDIDWaLuDiWaLuMIRRS
      OAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTD
      586.640.8550.57786.210.8510.48873.640.7140.32979.760.7810.86186.120.850.42588.770.8780.481
      1090.730.90.268940.9350.29391.140.9040.19290.850.9010.40790.880.9010.3292.890.9230.227
      1593.310.9280.27594.640.9420.32993.20.9260.34193.150.9260.27692.190.9150.33694.670.9290.284
      2094.080.9360.26295.30.9490.3794.230.9380.25194.640.9420.31693.460.9290.28795.120.9360.249
      2595.510.9510.32295.830.9550.24794.630.9420.24995.390.950.28194.320.9380.35595.780.9430.226
      3096.020.9570.34396.720.9640.37394.970.9460.19196.180.9590.18795.020.9460.3796.950.9540.252
    • Table 2. Comparison of classification performance of KSC dataset

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Comparison of classification performance of KSC dataset

      Number

      of bands

      Proposed

      method(β=0.1)

      SVDIDWaLuDiWaLuMIRRS
      OAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTD
      584.910.8310.24158.250.530.95852.980.4650.38381.960.7980.50581.380.7910.21680.770.7850.322
      1088.970.8770.20566.080.6180.54157.250.5150.45985.840.8420.29590.040.8890.44290.310.8920.172
      1591.740.9080.19869.450.6570.49861.260.5610.4289.540.8830.35992.490.9160.30792.760.9190.269
      2092.990.9220.27570.940.6740.38963.670.5890.46690.20.8910.28793.320.9260.18393.480.9270.273
      2594.120.9340.1472.660.6930.28768.570.6460.34190.970.8990.43993.90.9320.25394.110.9340.306
      3094.440.9380.09976.540.7370.50571.170.6760.41492.20.9110.31694.510.9390.24594.440.9380.308
    • Table 3. Comparison of classification performance of Indian pine dataset

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison of classification performance of Indian pine dataset

      Number

      of

      bands

      Proposed

      method(β=0.1)

      SVDIDWaLuDiWaLuMIRRS
      OAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTDOAKASTD
      569.610.6490.27269.880.650.51752.460.4430.41660.590.5350.35660.90.5410.34167.030.6160.496
      1080.780.780.18380.160.7730.255.870.4830.65175.150.7140.21677.850.7450.22175.190.7140.236
      1583.920.8160.23784.620.8240.22258.710.5180.58484.060.8180.23280.240.7730.17800.7710.256
      2086.380.8440.24286.240.8430.21962.310.5570.46585.780.8370.22385.390.8330.20683.170.8070.408
      2587.420.8560.19286.920.8510.19364.930.5930.38187.750.860.20686.440.8450.17384.830.8260.229
      3088.70.8710.25287.930.8620.30569.240.6470.20588.730.8710.16887.690.8590.25986.650.8470.275
    • Table 4. Comparison of |z| scores obtained

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Comparison of |z| scores obtained

      DatasetsSVDIDWaLuDiWaLuMIRRS
      Botswana3 290.11 228.4175.444 675.3437.5
      KSC6 425.812 547.82 445.65131.59.67
      IP2 265.6135 636.3136.0519 661.119 500
    • Table 5. Comparison of calculation time

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Comparison of calculation time

      DatasetsSVDIDWaLuDiWaLuMIRRSVPRS(β=0.1)
      Botswana357.9656.2647.8700.4514.9515.8
      KSC316.6542.3540.7585.9433.6430.7
      IP21.836.936.839.829.529.3
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Jing CHEN, Zhenxing ZHANG. Greedy Unsupervised Hyperspectral Image Band Selection Method Based on Variable Precision Rough Set[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2021, 50(2): 103

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Image Processing

    Received: --

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Aug. 26, 2021

    The Author Email:

    DOI:10.3788/gzxb20215002.0210004

    Topics