Matter and Radiation at Extremes, Volume. 9, Issue 5, 057203(2024)

Experimental measurements of gamma-photon production and estimation of electron/positron production on the PETAL laser facility

F. Brun1,a)... L. Ribotte1,2,3, G. Boutoux2,3, X. Davoine3,4, P. E. Masson-Laborde3,4, Y. Sentoku5, N. Iwata5, N. Blanchot2, D. Batani1, I. Lantuéjoul3, L. Lecherbourg3,4, B. Rosse3, C. Rousseaux3,4, B. Vauzour3, D. Raffestin1,2, E. D’Humières1 and X. Ribeyre2 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1Centre Lasers Intenses et Applications, UMR 5107, Université de Bordeaux-CNRS-CEA, 33405 Talence, France
  • 2CEA, DAM, CESTA, F-33116 Le Barp, France
  • 3CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France
  • 4CEA, LMCE, Université Paris-Saclay, 91680 Bruyères-le-Châtel, France
  • 5Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, 2-6 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(22)
    (a) Schematic of the equatorial layout of the experimental setup with the positions of the diagnostics indicated. (b) SPECTIX: hard-X ray spectrometer. (c) CRACC-X: bremsstrahlung spectrometer. (d) SESAME 1 and 2: electron and ion spectrometers.
    SESAME electron energy spectra obtained at 0° (blue curves) and 45° (red curves) for (a) shot SR174 and (b) shot SR182. The exponential fit (∼Ae−E/T) of each spectrum is also given (black curves).
    SESAME proton energy spectra obtained at 0° (blue curves) and 45° (red curves) for (a) shot SR174 and (b) shot SR182.
    Absolute temporally and spatially integrated X-ray spectra measured by SPECTIX for (a) shot SR174 with a LiF(200) crystal and (b) shot SR182 with a quartz (10-10) crystal (red curve) and a LiF(200) crystal (blue curve). Black vertical lines represent the exact energy of each emission line of tungsten. The inserts in (b) are zooms on zones of interest of the spectra.
    CRACC-X sensitivity response for each IP, inferred from GEANT4 simulations.
    Diagram of simulation chain setup used to calculate high-energy photon emission.
    Lineouts of the electron density profile of the preplasma for aluminum + plastic (orange) and tungsten (blue) targets from 2D axisymmetric TROLL simulations. The lineouts are taken at 1 μm from the central axis of the laser. The green curves correspond to a translation of the aluminum profile to superimpose the tungsten and the aluminum at 1nc. The red dashed lines correspond to the limits of the density profile used for the PIC simulations, which goes from 10nc to 0.1nc.
    Initial electron spectrum (red) from a 2D PIC CALDER simulation on a multilayer of Al (150 μm) followed by CH (10 μm) at 1.5 ps with a total a0 of 2.4 and the electron energy distribution generated at low energies (purple) with a temperature of 0.6 MeV. The blue line corresponds to the cutoff at 4 MeV. For the PIC target parameter, the aluminum density was taken from the hydrodynamic simulation, and the CH initially had a density of 20nc.
    Photon spectrum obtained with Geant4 (red) at the rear side of the tungsten target of 2 mm thickness and (blue) photon spectrum interacting with the detector generated by the interaction with an electron beam of energy 253 J. The inset is a zoom of the low-energy part of the photon spectrum in red.
    Spectra of all electrons at the rear side of the target (blue) and of those electrons that interact with the CRACC-X detector (green).
    Comparison between the measured spectra (dots) and the simulated data (curves) for an initial total electron energy of 253 J for SESAME 1 (blue) and SESAME 2 (red).
    (a) Energy deposition in each IP of the CRACC-X detector measured in the experiment (blue dots) and calculated using the simulation chain, with the contributions of the simulated populations of photons (green), electrons (red), and the sum of the two contributions (orange). These results are for an initial total electron energy of 253 J. (b) Energy deposited in each IP for different initial total electron energies.
    Positron energy spectrum at the rear side of the tungsten target at the end of the simulation. The electron initial total energy for the positron production is 253 J and the target is 2 mm thick.
    Number of positrons obtained in the Geant4 simulations normalized by the electron beam initial energy as a function of the Y parameter with electron/positron annihilation activated (blue) and without activation (red). The electron beam has an initial total energy of 253 J, and it interacts with tungsten targets of different thicknesses.
    Schematic of proposed configuration to produce Breit–Wheeler positrons with the PETAL facility.
    Number of LBW positrons produced by the collision of two γ beams colliding at an angle of 135° and a distance L = 0.05 cm, vs tungsten thickness. The electron initial total energy considered for the beam generation is 253 J.
    (a) Breit–Wheeler positron energy spectrum and (b) angular distribution produced by the collision of two γ beams, colliding at an angle of 135° and a distance L of 0.05 cm, and produced by an electron initial total energy of 253 J with a 0.8 mm tungsten target tickness.
    • Table 1. Laser parameters for the two shots on tungsten targets.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Laser parameters for the two shots on tungsten targets.

      ShotElaser (J)τpulse (fs)Itarget (W cm−2)
      SR1744266607.5 × 1018
      SR1824068855.5 × 1018
    • Table 2. Properties of K-shell emission lines detected with the SPECTIX diagnostic.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Properties of K-shell emission lines detected with the SPECTIX diagnostic.

      ShotAtomic lineE (keV)dN/dΩ (γ sr−1)
      SR174Kβ67.28.34 × 1011
      SR174Kα159.31.06 × 1012
      SR174Kα257.94.42 × 1011
      SR182LαLα1Lα28.332.16 × 1012
      8.40
      SR182Lβ9.71.65 × 1012
      SR182Kβ67.24.09 × 1011
      SR182Kα159.38.37 × 1012
      SR182Kα257.96.09 × 1011
    • Table 3. Composition of the CRACC-X diagnostic. An IP is placed downstream of each filter.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Composition of the CRACC-X diagnostic. An IP is placed downstream of each filter.

      Filter no.MaterialDensity (g cm−3)Thickness (mm)
      1Al2.700.09
      2Ti4.540.125
      3Fe7.870.125
      4Cu8.960.1
      5Mo10.220.1
      6Ag10.500.15
      7Sn7.310.5
      8Ta16.650.5
      9Au19.301.5
      10Pb11.351
      11Pb11.352
      12Pb11.353
      13Pb11.354
      14Pb11.356
      15Pb11.356
    • Table 4. Rear-side atomic lines for a cold tungsten target obtained by the Geant4 simulation.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Rear-side atomic lines for a cold tungsten target obtained by the Geant4 simulation.

      Atomic lineE (keV)dN/dE (γ MeV−1)
      Annihilation5116.41 × 1013
      Kβ2692.6 × 1013
      Kβ1678.4 × 1013
      Kα1592.1 × 1014
      Kα2581.1 × 1014
      Lγ1111.25 × 1012
      Lβ29.98.3 × 1012
      Lβ19.61.18 × 1013
      Lα8.31.1 × 1013
    • Table 5. Front-side atomic lines for a cold tungsten target obtained by the Geant4 simulation (Sim.) and K-shell emission lines detected with the SPECTIX diagnostic for shot SR174 (Expt.) from Table II.

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Front-side atomic lines for a cold tungsten target obtained by the Geant4 simulation (Sim.) and K-shell emission lines detected with the SPECTIX diagnostic for shot SR174 (Expt.) from Table II.

      TypeAtomic lineE (keV)dN/dΩ (γ sr−1)
      Sim.Kβ1676.82 × 1011
      Sim.Kα1591.48 × 1012
      Sim.Kα2587.67 × 1011
      Expt.Kβ67.28.34 × 1011
      Expt.Kα159.31.06 × 1012
      Expt.Kα257.94.42 × 1011
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    F. Brun, L. Ribotte, G. Boutoux, X. Davoine, P. E. Masson-Laborde, Y. Sentoku, N. Iwata, N. Blanchot, D. Batani, I. Lantuéjoul, L. Lecherbourg, B. Rosse, C. Rousseaux, B. Vauzour, D. Raffestin, E. D’Humières, X. Ribeyre. Experimental measurements of gamma-photon production and estimation of electron/positron production on the PETAL laser facility[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2024, 9(5): 057203

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Mar. 1, 2024

    Accepted: Jul. 14, 2024

    Published Online: Oct. 14, 2024

    The Author Email: Brun F. (florent.brun.1@u-bordeaux.fr)

    DOI:10.1063/5.0206416

    Topics