Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, Volume. 41, Issue 2, 257(2024)

Calculation of reflection⁃absorption loss of light distribution elements in illumination system

KANG Xueliang1... CHE Xinrui1, XUE Rui1, WANG Li1,2, ZHANG Bai1,* and WEI Xiantao3 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electrical & Information Engineering, North Minzu University, Yinchuan 750021, China
  • 2School of Mechanical Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
  • 3School of Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(10)
    Reflection-absorption loss model of free-form surface light distribution lens
    Collimation principle of TIR lens. (a) Entirety; (b) Edge part
    Light distribution lens with different collecting angles. (a) 30°; (b) 60°
    TIR light distribution lens
    Photos of light distribution lens. (a) Plane-convex lens; (b) TIR lens
    Illuminance plot of spot in experiment. (a) Plane-convex lens; (b) TIR lens
    • Table 1. Comparison between calculated value of reflection⁃absorption loss model and simulated value ofplano⁃convex collimating lens

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Comparison between calculated value of reflection⁃absorption loss model and simulated value ofplano⁃convex collimating lens

      Collecting angle of lens30°60°
      Incident flux ϕ/lm25.0075.00
      Reflection loss of front surface Δϕ1/lmCalculated value1.475.08
      Simulated value————
      Absorption loss of material Δϕ1΄ /lmCalculated value4.3324.93
      Simulated value————
      Reflection loss of rear surface Δϕ2 /lmCalculated value1.063.84
      Simulated value————
      Outgoing flux ϕ2 /lmCalculated value18.1341.15
      Simulated value17.9740.63
      Total loss Δϕ /lmCalculated value6.8733.85
      Simulated value7.0334.37
      TransmissivityCalculated value72.52%54.87%
      Simulated value71.89%54.17%
      Absolute error0.62%0.70%
    • Table 2. Comparison of transmissivity of plano⁃convex collimating lens with different light source radius

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Comparison of transmissivity of plano⁃convex collimating lens with different light source radius

      Source radius/mmCalculated transmissivitySimulated transmissivityAbsolute error
      0.00154.87%54.17%0.70%
      0.554.87%54.10%0.77%
      154.87%54.02%0.85%
      254.87%53.79%1.08%
      454.87%51.83%3.04%
    • Table 3. Comparison between calculated value of reflection⁃absorption loss model and simulated value of TIR lens

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Comparison between calculated value of reflection⁃absorption loss model and simulated value of TIR lens

      Calculated valueSimulated value
      Reflection loss of front surface Δϕ1/lm11.08——
      Absorption loss of material Δϕ1΄ /lm52.16——
      Reflection loss of rear surface Δϕ2 /lm2.31——
      Outgoing flux ϕ2 /lm34.4534.31
      Total loss Δϕ /lm65.5565.69
      Transmissivity34.45%34.31%
    • Table 4. Comparison of calculated, simulated and measured transmissivity of plano⁃convex lens and TIR lens

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Comparison of calculated, simulated and measured transmissivity of plano⁃convex lens and TIR lens

      Lens typeCalculated valueSimulated valueMeasured valueAbsolute error
      Plane-convex91.44%90.02%84.06%7.38%
      TIR82.58%82.22%80.14%2.44%
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xueliang KANG, Xinrui CHE, Rui XUE, Li WANG, Bai ZHANG, Xiantao WEI. Calculation of reflection⁃absorption loss of light distribution elements in illumination system[J]. Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics, 2024, 41(2): 257

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Oct. 4, 2022

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jun. 24, 2024

    The Author Email: ZHANG Bai (zhangbai6402@163.com)

    DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-5461.2024.02.008

    Topics