Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, Volume. 58, Issue 20, 2028002(2021)

Deep Learning and Spatial Analysis Based Port Detection

Zeming Li1, Liang Cheng2,3,4,5, Daming Zhu1、*, Zhaojin Yan2,3, Chen Ji2,3, Zhixin Duan2,3, Min Jing2, Ning Li2, Shengkun Dongye1, Yanruo Song1, and Jiahui Liu6
Author Affiliations
  • 1Faculty of Land and Resources Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan 650093, China
  • 2School of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China
  • 3Collaborative Innovation Center of South China Sea Studies, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China
  • 4Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China
  • 5Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Novel Software Technology and Industrialization, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210023, China
  • 6School of Geography and Ecotourism, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan 650051, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(8)
    Structural diagram of YOLO v3 network
    Wharf marking at different datasets. (a) DIOR; (b) TGRS-HRRSD; (c)(d) level 19 Google remote sensing image
    PR curve of wharf recognition
    Recognition results of wharves. (a) Original image; (b) local image; (c) recognition of wharf with single ship docked; (d) recognition of wharf with many ships docked; (e) wharf recognition in complex scene; (f) wharf recognition when prescene of flares on sea surface; (g) recognition of jetty wharf; (h) recognition of along-shore wharf; (i)(j) typical misrecognitions
    (a) Port hotspots and (b)--(e) aggregated polygons
    • Table 1. Comparsion of anchor boxes before and after adjustment

      View table

      Table 1. Comparsion of anchor boxes before and after adjustment

      Scale of feature mapOriginal anchor boxesNew anchor boxes
      52×5210×13; 16×30; 33×2331×97; 31×30; 47×156
      26×2630×61; 62×45; 59×11957×49; 85×93; 130×43
      13×13116×90; 156×198; 373×326164×162; 293×300; 511×511
    • Table 2. Comparison of performances between two models in experimental area

      View table

      Table 2. Comparison of performances between two models in experimental area

      ModelATPAFPAFNprF1
      Original YOLO v31258756358.96%18.17%27.78%
      Proposed algorithm36413732472.65%52.91%61.23%
    • Table 3. Hotspot analysis results under different thresholds

      View table

      Table 3. Hotspot analysis results under different thresholds

      Threshold /mNumber of hotspotsNumber of portsProportion of ports in hotspotsNumber of aggregated polygons
      5002241174878.00%438
      8001932146875.98%442
      10001757135377.01%465
      12001617126177.98%450
      15001481115778.12%435
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Zeming Li, Liang Cheng, Daming Zhu, Zhaojin Yan, Chen Ji, Zhixin Duan, Min Jing, Ning Li, Shengkun Dongye, Yanruo Song, Jiahui Liu. Deep Learning and Spatial Analysis Based Port Detection[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(20): 2028002

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Remote Sensing and Sensors

    Received: Oct. 14, 2020

    Accepted: Jan. 2, 2021

    Published Online: Oct. 15, 2021

    The Author Email: Zhu Daming (634617255@qq.com)

    DOI:10.3788/LOP202158.2028002

    Topics