Optics and Precision Engineering, Volume. 32, Issue 15, 2387(2024)

Modeling of removal function and optimization of process parameters for robotic polishing M-ZnS

Yikai ZANG1... Beibei ZHU2, Lin QIN2, Yao SHANG1, Junhao SHANG1, Zhongdi SHE1, Xiao CHEN3, Junfeng XIAO1 and Jianfeng XU1,* |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan430074, China
  • 2Shanghai Aerospace Control Technology Research Institute, Shanghai01108, China
  • 3School of Mechanical Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan40068, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(18)
    Working priniciple of robotic polishing
    FEA contact model of polishing pad
    Pressure distribution at bottom of pitch pad under different loads
    (a) Comparison of pressure cross-section curves; (b) Comparison of pressure cross-section curve fits for F=5 N
    Comparison between modified removal function and unmodified removal function with different polishing parameters
    Comparison of corrected removal function with polished removal function
    Experimental setup
    Removal profile of ZnS for different polishing pressures
    Effect of pressure on M-ZnS material removal
    Removal profile for different speed ratios
    M-ZnS material removal rate for different speed ratios
    M-ZnS flat optic
    Polishing simulation results
    Comparison between before and after robotic polishing of M-Zn flat optic
    • Table 1. Mechanical parameters of simulated materials

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Mechanical parameters of simulated materials

      Mechanical

      parameters

      45# steelM-ZnSPitch
      Density/(kg·m-37 7504 0901 050
      Young modulus/Pa1.93×10118.55×10104.80×109
      Poisson's ratio0.310.280.35
    • Table 2. Determination coefficients for different orders of fitted curves

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Determination coefficients for different orders of fitted curves

      Pressure/NR22R42R62
      20.981 10.998 70.999 8
      50.982 10.999 10.999 8
      100.974 10.999 00.999 8
      150.972 30.999 20.999 8
    • Table 3. Experimental parameters of pressure test

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Experimental parameters of pressure test

      Speed ratio/(r·min-1Eccentricity radius/mmPolishing pressure/MPaSlurryTemperature/°C
      200/-5020.1Al2O320
      200/-5020.12Al2O320
      200/-5020.14Al2O320
      200/-5020.16Al2O320
      200/-5020.18Al2O320
      200/-5020.20Al2O320
    • Table 4. Experimental parameters of speed ratio test

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Experimental parameters of speed ratio test

      Speed ratio/(r·min-1Eccentricity radius/mmPolishing pressure/MPaSlurryTemperature/°C
      200/020.12Al2O320
      200/-1020.12Al2O320
      200/-5020.12Al2O320
      200/-10020.12Al2O320
      200/-15020.12Al2O320
      200/-20020.12Al2O320
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Yikai ZANG, Beibei ZHU, Lin QIN, Yao SHANG, Junhao SHANG, Zhongdi SHE, Xiao CHEN, Junfeng XIAO, Jianfeng XU. Modeling of removal function and optimization of process parameters for robotic polishing M-ZnS[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2024, 32(15): 2387

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category:

    Received: Jun. 4, 2024

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Sep. 27, 2024

    The Author Email: XU Jianfeng (jfxu@hust.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.37188/OPE.20243215.2387

    Topics