Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, Volume. 43, Issue 1, 106(2024)

Infrared small target detection based on associated directional gradient and mean contrast

Ning LI1, Yi-Fang GUO1、*, Ji-Chao JIAO1, Min PANG2, and Wei XU2
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Electronic Engineering,Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Beijing 100876,China
  • 2Third Research Department,China Institute of Radio Propagation,Qingdao 266108,China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(19)
    flowchart of ADGMC
    target near the highlighted edge
    Gradient detection structure of each associated direction (a) is the upper associate left, (b) is the upper associate right, (c) is the right associate lower, (d) is the lower associate left
    Infrared small target near the highlighted edge (a) Local enlargement,(b) Pixel schematic
    structure of left associate upper direction,with size of 7*7
    Comparison before and after nonlinear mapping (a) original infrared image,(b) ADG,(c) 3D grayscale view of ADG,(d)ADGmappedx,y,(e) 3D grayscale view of ADGmappedx,y
    structure of mean contrast filter
    test image
    Comparison of assoicated directional gradient and single directional gradient (a) left gradient,(b) upper gradient,(c) down gradient,(d) right direction,(e) single-direction gradient product,(f) mesh of (e),(g) left-upper gradient,(h) upper-right gradient,(i) down-left gradient,(j) right-down gradient,(k) associated directional gradient product,(l) mesh of (k)
    IR image with isolated noise added
    MC calculation process diagram (a) left mean contrast; (b) upper mean contrast; (c) down mean contrast; (d) right mean contrast; (e) final MC
    Diagram of ADGMC calculation process (a) grayscale diagram of MC; (b) mesh of MC; (c) grayscale diagram of ADG; (d) mesh of ADG; (e) grayscale diagram of ADGMC; (f) mesh of ADGMC
    top to bottom: Data1-Data4 (a) original image,(b)ADG,(c)ADGmapped,(d) MC,(e) ADGMC,(f) Result(The top right corner is a zoomed-in view near the small target)
    Part of Data5 processing process (a) original image,(b)ADG,(c)ADGmapped,(d) MC,(e) ADGMC,(f) Result(The top right corner is a zoomed-in view near the small target)
    Data1 to Data5 corresponding ROC curves (a) Data 1,(b) Data 2,(c) Data 3,(d) Data 4
    • Table 1. Detailed description of image data

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Detailed description of image data

      sizeamounttarget numberdata type
      Data1320*240100100single-target sequence
      Data2320*2403030single-target sequence
      Data3320*240100100single-target sequence
      Data4320*240100100single-target sequence
      Data5127*1272126mixed image group
    • Table 2. Average SCRG results for different detection methods for each group of images

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Average SCRG results for different detection methods for each group of images

      AAGDAMWLCMLEFMaxmeanMaxmedMPCMTophatRLCMTLLCMProposed
      Data14.991.001.580.532.551.261.200.081.1938.66
      Data23.371.091.720.740.372.321.580.344.3848.28
      Data31.910.461.450.640.391.401.230.452.4774.34
      Data45.640.183.210.490.203.210.730.4915.77125.42
      Data55.231.222.610.680.523.081.280.278.0721.37
    • Table 3. Average BSF results for different detection methods for each group of images

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Average BSF results for different detection methods for each group of images

      AAGDAMWLCMLEFMaxmeanMaxmedMPCMTophatRLCMTLLCMProposed
      Data136.698.3519.629.9416.5232.886.624.9621.8246.12
      Data28.021.282.831.111.275.301.422.395.8412.38
      Data38.593.853.933.304.398.732.115.359.4533.92
      Data418.281.969.871.942.0217.271.775.3512.2823.76
      Data58.312.316.082.632.747.152.432.235.7912.93
    • Table 4. Average time efficiency of different detection methods for each group of images (in s)

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Average time efficiency of different detection methods for each group of images (in s)

      AAGDAMWLCMLEFMaxmeanMaxmedMPCMTophatRLCMTLLCMProposed
      Data10.042 92.819 18.042 30.006 10.008 90.041 83.052 21.947 10.004 20.040 1
      Data20.039 42.801 28.048 20.006 00.011 20.041 53.615 12.378 00.003 70.040 1
      Data30.039 72.806 98.047 40.005 90.008 80.042 23.454 32.257 30.003 80.041 1
      Data40.038 92.802 78.012 90.005 90.009 90.041 63.621 32.377 20.003 80.042 2
      Data50.080 11.657 75.866 00.012 30.010 40.065 52.767 72.206 90.017 50.013 8
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Ning LI, Yi-Fang GUO, Ji-Chao JIAO, Min PANG, Wei XU. Infrared small target detection based on associated directional gradient and mean contrast[J]. Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, 2024, 43(1): 106

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: Jul. 12, 2023

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Dec. 26, 2023

    The Author Email: GUO Yi-Fang (yifang_guo@126.com)

    DOI:10.11972/j.issn.1001-9014.2024.01.015

    Topics