High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume. 5, Issue 2, 02000e12(2017)

An automated, 0.5 Hz nano-foil target positioning system for intense laser plasma experiments

Ying Gao1, Jianhui Bin1,2, Daniel Haffa1, Christian Kreuzer1, Jens Hartmann1, Martin Speicher1, Florian H. Lindner1, Tobias M. Ostermayr1,2, Peter Hilz1, Thomas F. Rösch1, Sebastian Lehrack1, Franz Englbrecht1, Sebastian Seuferling1, Max Gilljohann1,2, Hao Ding1,2, Wenjun Ma3, Katia Parodi1, and Jörg Schreiber1,2、†
Author Affiliations
  • 1Lehrstuhl für Medizinphysik, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Am Coulombwall 1, D-85748, Garching, Germany
  • 2Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik, D-85748 Garching, Germany
  • 3Peking University, Beijing 100871, PR China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(5)
    Schematic of nFTPS. Plastic film targets cover the holes on the target holders (bottom left), which are then mounted in the target wheel. The diameter of target holes is $500~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ and the distance between two holes along the same radial line is 2.5 mm, the angle between two adjacent radial lines is $0.903^{\circ }$. An adjustable microscope can be moved independently to observe and position individual targets in transverse direction $(x{-}y)$. The chromatic distance sensor is used to adjust the longitudinal target position $(z)$.
    Deviation (in $z$-axis) distribution of 1683 targets (17 holders) and corresponding normal distribution fit. After positioning all targets via the microscope and distance sensor, the displacements after repositioning are shown blue. The measurements are performed in vacuum condition. $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}$ is the standard deviation.
    The trend of average deviations after movement for different hexapod velocities. Each point represents the average deviation for 99 targets of one holder, which were measured via the same procedure as described for Figure 2. The error bars represent the standard deviation of 99 data points.
    (a) System vibration induced by ceasing hexapod with speed of $12.5~\text{mm}/\text{s}$, (b) the corresponding Fast Fourier Transform and (c) beating frequency simulation. The real time displacements are measured on one film target with the distance sensor after hexapod movement with speed of $12.5~\text{mm}/\text{s}$ in vacuum condition.
    (a) Measured spectra of proton kinetic energies (color bars) and their corresponding distribution of maximum energies. The error bars of single shot results represent the accuracy of the maximum energy determined by the wide angle magnetic spectrometer. The part between the two dashed lines correlates to $5.1{-}9~\text{MeV}$, where 95% of shots’ cutoff energies are located and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}$ is the corresponding standard deviation. (top). (b) Proton numbers per milli-steradian per 1% kinetic energy at three different kinetic energies: 4, 5 and 6 MeV. (bottom).
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Ying Gao, Jianhui Bin, Daniel Haffa, Christian Kreuzer, Jens Hartmann, Martin Speicher, Florian H. Lindner, Tobias M. Ostermayr, Peter Hilz, Thomas F. Rösch, Sebastian Lehrack, Franz Englbrecht, Sebastian Seuferling, Max Gilljohann, Hao Ding, Wenjun Ma, Katia Parodi, Jörg Schreiber. An automated, 0.5 Hz nano-foil target positioning system for intense laser plasma experiments[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2017, 5(2): 02000e12

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Special Issue: TARGET FABRICATION

    Received: Nov. 2, 2016

    Accepted: Apr. 18, 2017

    Published Online: Jul. 26, 2018

    The Author Email: Jörg Schreiber (Joerg.Schreiber@lmu.de)

    DOI:10.1017/hpl.2017.10

    Topics