Journal of Natural Resources, Volume. 35, Issue 8, 1926(2020)

Dynamic mechanism of rural development oriented urban-rural integration

Xin LI1...2,3, Xiao-dong MA1,2,3,*, Manh-ha KHUONG4 and Jin-yan ZHU1 |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Geography, Geomatics & Planning, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
  • 2Institute of Urban-Rural Integrated Development, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
  • 3Research Base on Characteristic Town-Village Construction and Land Management, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China
  • 4School of Land, Resources & Environment, Bacgiang University of Agricultural and Forestry, Bacgiang 0084240, Vietnam
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(7)
    Rural development dynamic mechanism framework based on urban-rural integration perspective
    Flowchart of rural development dynamic path under the guidance of urban-rural integration
    Mutual driving forces path for rural development based on the SEM model
    • Table 1. Representation and descriptive statistics of variables in SEM model

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Representation and descriptive statistics of variables in SEM model

      潜变量标识观察变量标识平均值标准差
      基础设施融合水平F1污水处理村占比X14.483.50
      自来水村占比X25.602.84
      公路网密度X34.492.66
      与城市时间距离X45.322.99
      公共服务融合水平F3学校数目X54.502.68
      千人床位数X63.433.20
      千人教师数X74.703.23
      乡村要素集聚水平F4地均GDPX84.283.29
      建设用地图斑大小X93.382.61
      单位居住图斑人口X103.972.60
      乡村要素吸引力F2外来人口X112.934.27
      法人企业个数X123.933.06
      固定资产投资X132.562.47
      二三产业人员占比X145.382.17
      乡村发展水平F5农民人均收入X154.572.68
      人均财政收入X163.502.58
    • Table 2. Summary table of test parameters in SEM model

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Summary table of test parameters in SEM model

      统计检验量适配标准或临界值模型结果是否符合标准
      绝对适配度参数χ2P<0.050.000
      RMSEAP<0.080.793
      SRMRP<0.080.126
      GFIP>0.90.904
      增值适配度参数NFIP>0.90.852
      RFIP>0.90.806
      IFIP>0.90.905
      TLIP>0.90.873
      CFIP>0.90.903
      简约适配度参数PGFIP>0.50.557
      PNFIP>0.50.653
      PCFIP>0.50.692
      CNP>20065
      χ2自由度比P<32.527
    • Table 3. Regression results of rural development driving forces based on SEM model

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Regression results of rural development driving forces based on SEM model

      作用
      路径
      标准化
      回归权重
      显著性作用
      路径
      标准化
      回归权重
      显著性作用
      路径
      标准化
      回归权重
      显著性
      F4←F10.460.049X4F1-0.65***X6F30.42***
      F2←F30.970.009X11F20.24——X5F31.00***
      F5←F40.340.011X12F20.320.033X8F40.21——
      F5←F20.700.019X13F20.980.009X9F40.890.01
      X1F10.64——X14F20.360.023X10F40.910.03
      X2F10.45***X16F50.49——X15F50.77***
      X3F10.48***X7F30.98——F3↔F10.310
    • Table 4. Direct and indirect effects among latent variables

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Direct and indirect effects among latent variables

      路径总效应直接效应间接效应
      F2←F30.97380.97380
      F5←F30.683600.6836
      F4←F10.46420.46420
      F5←F10.155800.1558
      F5←F40.33560.33560
      F5←F20.70200.70200
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Xin LI, Xiao-dong MA, Manh-ha KHUONG, Jin-yan ZHU. Dynamic mechanism of rural development oriented urban-rural integration[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(8): 1926

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Received: Feb. 20, 2020

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Jan. 6, 2021

    The Author Email: MA Xiao-dong (xiaodgma@163.com)

    DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200813

    Topics