High Power Laser Science and Engineering, Volume. 8, Issue 1, 010000e7(2020)

Hydrodynamic computational modelling and simulations of collisional shock waves in gas jet targets Editors' Pick

Stylianos Passalidis1, Oliver C. Ettlinger2, George S. Hicks2, Nicholas P. Dover3, Zulfikar Najmudin2, Emmanouil P. Benis4, Evaggelos Kaselouris5, Nektarios A. Papadogiannis5, Michael Tatarakis6, and Vasilis Dimitriou5、*
Author Affiliations
  • 1Institute of Plasma Physics & Lasers, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Chania 73133, Rethymno 74100, Greece
  • 2The John Adams Institute, The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  • 3The John Adams Institute, The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK
  • 4Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, GR Ioannina 45110, Greece
  • 5Institute of Plasma Physics & Lasers, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Chania 73133, Rethymno 74100, Greece
  • 6Institute of Plasma Physics & Lasers, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Chania 73133, Rethymno 74100, Greece
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(11)
    Simulation of the spherical expansion of the blast wave (left) and the lineout (red line) of the steep density walls at the front of the shock (right) in an homogeneous hydrogen gas, for initial density of $0.5\times 10^{17}~\text{cm}^{-3}$ and 1 mJ absorbed energy of the BNL $\text{CO}_{2}$ laser.
    Time evolution of density profiles along the laser propagation axis for a blast wave at $t=0,1,12$ and 20 ns, corresponding to the BNL $\text{CO}_{2}$ laser, at 4 bar initial pressure and absorbed energy 20 mJ. The laser beam is focused at $z=-0.02~\text{cm}$.
    Left: the cylinder where the energy is deposited, representing the confocal volume of the laser pulse with $w_{0}=35~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ and $Z_{R}=374~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$. At $t=0$, the beam is focused at $z=-0.06~\text{cm}$ along the laser propagation axis ($z$-axis) along the direction of the gas flow ($y$-axis). Right: the formation of the blast wave at $t=4~\text{ns}$ corresponding to the $\text{CO}_{2}$ specifications, at 4 bar initial pressure and absorbed energy 100 mJ, deposited at $z=-0.02~\text{cm}$.
    The triangular density shape used in the simulation (blue) and the initial energy deposition (red), for $w_{0}=35~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$, $Z_{R}=374~~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ and $E_{\text{abs}}=10~\text{mJ}$.
    The profiles of backing pressures of 4, 5 and 6 bar (maximum) that correspond to the molecular densities of $n=3.39\times 10^{18}~\text{cm}^{-3}$, $n=4.42\times 10^{18}~\text{cm}^{-3}$ and $n=5.09\times 10^{18}~\text{cm}^{-3}$, respectively.
    Comparison of the FLASH and self-similar Sedov results for 20 mJ absorbed energy, for initial density $n=3.39\times 10^{18}~\text{cm}^{-3}$, deposited at 0.02 cm prior to the centre of the throat.
    The blast wave radii (left) and the corresponding ratio of the peak electron density to the critical density (right). Time evolution up to 20 ns for 1, 5, 20 and 100 mJ absorbed energy deposited at $z=0.1~\text{cm}$ prior to the centre of the throat. Initial density was set to $n=3.39\times 10^{18}~\text{cm}^{-3}$.
    The blast wave radii (left) and the corresponding ratio of the peak electron density to the critical density (right). Time evolution up to 20 ns for 1, 5, 20 and 100 mJ absorbed energy deposited at 0.02 cm prior to the centre of the throat. Initial density was set to $n=3.39\times 10^{18}~\text{cm}^{-3}$.
    The density scale lengths versus time (left) and blast wave radii length (right), for density of $n=4.42\times 10^{18}~\text{cm}^{-3}$ and absorbed energies of 5, 20 and 100 mJ.
    The blast wave radii (left) and the corresponding ratio of peak electron density to the critical density (right). Time evolution up to 15 ns for 5, 50, 100, 250, 500 and 1000 mJ absorbed energies, deposited at 0.05 cm prior to the centre of the throat. Initial density was set to $n=4.52\times 10^{20}~\text{cm}^{-3}$.
    The density scale lengths versus time (left) and blast wave radii length (right), for density of $n=4.52\times 10^{21}~\text{cm}^{-3}$ and absorbed energies of 5, 50, 100, 250, 500 and 1000 mJ.
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Stylianos Passalidis, Oliver C. Ettlinger, George S. Hicks, Nicholas P. Dover, Zulfikar Najmudin, Emmanouil P. Benis, Evaggelos Kaselouris, Nektarios A. Papadogiannis, Michael Tatarakis, Vasilis Dimitriou. Hydrodynamic computational modelling and simulations of collisional shock waves in gas jet targets[J]. High Power Laser Science and Engineering, 2020, 8(1): 010000e7

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Category: Research Articles

    Received: Sep. 23, 2019

    Accepted: Feb. 7, 2020

    Published Online: Mar. 27, 2020

    The Author Email: Vasilis Dimitriou (dimvasi@hmu.gr)

    DOI:10.1017/hpl.2020.5

    Topics