Journal of Natural Resources, Volume. 35, Issue 1, 82(2020)

Empirical study on the coupling coordination between development intensity and resources-and-environment carrying capacity of core cities in Pearl River Delta

Da-fang WU... Yue HU, Yan-yan LIU* and Yi-hua LIU |Show fewer author(s)
Author Affiliations
  • School of Geographical Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • show less
    Figures & Tables(16)
    The study area
    Changing of evaluation of resources and environment carrying capacity
    Changes of evaluation of resources and environment carrying capacity
    The coupling case
    The coordination case
    • Table 1. Evaluation index system of development intensity

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 1. Evaluation index system of development intensity

      目标层准则层指标层单位影响系数




      城市开发强度评价指标体系
      A1人口聚集能力X1年末常住人口数0.115
      X2人口密度人/km2 0.1167
      A2经济发展水平X3地区生产总值0.1135
      X4年末单位从业人数0.1039
      X5财政收入0.0861
      X6工业总资产贡献率%0.1209
      X7资产形成总额0.1209
      A3土地扩张程度X8城市建设用地面积km²0.0601
      X9建成区面积km²0.0601
      A4社会投入水平X10全年固定资产投资0.0683
      X11招商引资0.0346
    • Table 2. Grading of development intensity

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 2. Grading of development intensity

      城市开发强度(0, 0.47](0.47, 0.73](0.73, 1]
      等级低强度开发中强度开发高强度开发
    • Table 3. Evaluation index system of resources-and-environment carrying capacity

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 3. Evaluation index system of resources-and-environment carrying capacity

      目标层准则层指标层单位影响系数









      资源环境承载力
      评价指标体系
      B1自然资源环境
      支撑力
      Y1耕地面积km20.0562
      Y2人均公园绿地面积m2/人0.0781
      Y3建成区绿化覆盖率%0.0886
      B2社会经济资源
      环境支撑力
      Y4人均GDP元/人0.0411
      Y5城镇居民人均可支配收入元/人0.0512
      Y6第三产业占生产总值比例%0.0371
      Y7 R&D 经费总额0.0886
      Y8建成区道路面积密度%0.0250
      B3资源环境压力Y9户籍迁入人口数0.0910
      Y10人均水资源消耗量t0.0459
      Y11电力消耗量kW∙h0.0744
      Y12工业废水排放量t0.0006
      Y13工业废气排放量m30.0471
      Y14工业固体废物产生量t0.0712
      Y15工业烟(粉)尘排放总量t0.0420
      B4社会润滑力Y16污水处理率%0.0447
      Y17生活垃圾无害化处理率%0.0063
      Y18市政公用设施投资额0.0767
      Y19空气质量达标率%0.0339
    • Table 4. Grading of resources-and-environment carrying capacity

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 4. Grading of resources-and-environment carrying capacity

      资源环境承载力(0, 0.42](0.42, 0.7](0.7, 1]
      等级低承载力中承载力高承载力
    • Table 5. Grading of coupling between development intensity and resources-and-environment carrying capacity

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 5. Grading of coupling between development intensity and resources-and-environment carrying capacity

      耦合度(0, 0.3](0.3, 0.5](0.5, 0.8](0.8, 1]
      等级低水平耦合拮抗耦合磨合耦合高水平耦合
    • Table 6. Grading of coordination between development intensity and resources-and-environment carrying capacity

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 6. Grading of coordination between development intensity and resources-and-environment carrying capacity

      耦合度协调度等级耦合度协调度等级
      (0, 0.1)极度失调[0.5, 0.6)勉强协调
      [0.1, 0.2)严重失调[0.6, 0.7)初级协调
      [0.2, 0.3)中度失调[0.7, 0.8)中极协调
      [0.3, 0.4)轻度失调[0.8, 0.9)良好协调
      [0.4, 0.5)濒临失调[0.9, 1]优质协调
    • Table 7. Development intensity in 2017

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 7. Development intensity in 2017

      城市广州深圳珠海佛山惠州东莞中山江门肇庆
      开发强度0.72160.92240.07810.29390.12510.56900.11340.08190.0548
      开发等级中强度高强度低强度低强度低强度中强度低强度低强度低强度
    • Table 8. Changes of development intensity

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 8. Changes of development intensity

      城市广州深圳东莞佛山珠海惠州中山江门肇庆
      2017年0.72160.92240.56900.39390.07810.12510.11340.08190.0548
      2010年0.74720.88200.38870.35250.11010.11300.16050.33000.0609
      2005年0.82060.87960.51130.35940.07240.11080.12360.12290.0907
    • Table 9. Grading of resources-and-environment carrying capacity in 2017

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 9. Grading of resources-and-environment carrying capacity in 2017

      城市广州深圳珠海佛山惠州东莞中山江门肇庆
      承载指数0.47890.52760.66990.32380.52470.38350.51440.54260.5113
      等级中等中等中等较低中等较低中等中等中等
      类型经济拉动经济拉动自然拉动转型探索自然拉动转型探索自然拉动自然拉动自然拉动
    • Table 10. Grading of coupling coordination in 2017

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 10. Grading of coupling coordination in 2017

      城市广州深圳珠海佛山惠州东莞中山江门肇庆
      耦合度0.71160.80700.51910.45690.47260.60980.46190.46030.4311
      等级磨合耦合高耦合磨合耦合拮抗耦合拮抗耦合磨合耦合拮抗耦合拮抗耦合拮抗耦合
      耦合协调度0.65360.76490.44060.37560.39190.53890.38080.37910.3494
      等级初级协调中级协调濒临失调濒临失调濒临失调勉强协调濒临失调濒临失调濒临失调
    • Table 11. Regression coefficient of independent variable

      View table
      View in Article

      Table 11. Regression coefficient of independent variable

      自变量相关化系数自变量相关化系数
      人口聚集能力0.6480自然资源环境承载力0.2630
      经济发展水平-0.1480社会经济承载力0.3050
      土地扩张程度0.3110资源环境压力0.1450
      社会投入水平0.1360社会润滑力0.1620
    Tools

    Get Citation

    Copy Citation Text

    Da-fang WU, Yue HU, Yan-yan LIU, Yi-hua LIU. Empirical study on the coupling coordination between development intensity and resources-and-environment carrying capacity of core cities in Pearl River Delta[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(1): 82

    Download Citation

    EndNote(RIS)BibTexPlain Text
    Save article for my favorites
    Paper Information

    Received: Jul. 30, 2019

    Accepted: --

    Published Online: Sep. 25, 2020

    The Author Email: LIU Yan-yan (liuyy@gzhu.edu.cn)

    DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200108

    Topics