Dielectronic recombination in non-LTE plasmas

F. B. Rosmej; V. A. Astapenko; V. S. Lisitsa; L. A. Vainshtein

doi:10.1063/5.0014158

Matter and Radiation at Extremes, Volume. 5, Issue 6, 064201(2020)

Dielectronic recombination in non-LTE plasmas

F. B. Rosmej1...2,3,4,a), V. A. Astapenko3, V. S. Lisitsa3,4,5 and L. A. Vainshtein6 |Show fewer author(s)

¹Sorbonne University, Faculty of Science and Engineering, UMR 7605, Case 128, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, France

²LULI, Ecole Polytechnique, CNRS-CEA, Physique Atomique dans les Plasmas Denses (PAPD), Route de Saclay, F-91128 Palaiseau Cedex, France

³Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology MIPT (National Research University), Dolgoprudnyi 141700, Russia

⁴National Research Nuclear University—MEPhI, Department of Plasma Physics, Moscow 115409, Russia

⁵National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia

⁶P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia

show less

Figures & Tables(10)

Fig. 1. Energy-level diagram of the He-like autoionizing levels 2l2l′ and their associated radiative decays, so-called Ly_α satellites. After radiative decay, the singly excited states 1s2l^1,3L are formed, from which further radiative decay proceeds (e.g., the resonance and intercombination lines W and Y, respectively). Also indicated are the Li-like autoionizing levels 1s2l2l′.

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 2. MARIA simulations of dielectronic satellite emission near Ly_α of H-like Mg ions for different values of the electron density at kT_e = 100 eV. The red arrows indicate the rises in intensity of particular satellite transitions with increasing density. Satellites indicated in blue have effective negative screening due to strong angular-momentum coupling effects.

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 3. Comparison of the l-averaged statistical approach with the Burgess and quantum level-by-level calculations for the Ni-like sequence 3s²3p⁶3d¹⁰ of Xe²⁶⁺ and Au⁵¹⁺.

Download full size

View in Article

Fig. 4. Comparison of the l-averaged statistical approach with the Burgess and quantum level-by-level calculations for the Sr-like sequence 4s²4p⁶4d² of W³⁶⁺ and the Zn-like sequence 4s² of tungsten W⁴⁴⁺.

Download full size

View in Article

Table 1. B_d factors according to Eqs. (3.20) and (3.21) for DR into Li-like ions originating from the 1s²nln′l′ autoionizing levels, with Z = Z_n − 2, m = 1, and l₀ = 0. The numerical data show single- and multichannel approximations as well as the corresponding factors according to the Burgess approach (note that the different numerical coefficients and the oscillator strength in the original Burgess formula [Eq. (3.10)] compared with Eq. (3.20) have been included in the value for $B_{d}^{(Burgess)}$ to facilitate comparison of the different methods).

View table

View in Article

Table 1. B_d factors according to Eqs. (3.20) and (3.21) for DR into Li-like ions originating from the 1s²nln′l′ autoionizing levels, with Z = Z_n − 2, m = 1, and l₀ = 0. The numerical data show single- and multichannel approximations as well as the corresponding factors according to the Burgess approach (note that the different numerical coefficients and the oscillator strength in the original Burgess formula [Eq. (3.10)] compared with Eq. (3.20) have been included in the value for $B_{d}^{(Burgess)}$ to facilitate comparison of the different methods).

Element	1s²2lnl′: α₀ = 1s²2s → α = 1s²2p
Element	$B_{d}^{(1 - channel)}$	$B_{d}^{(multichannel)}$	$B_{d}^{(Burgess)}$
Be	8.09 × 10⁻⁵	…	1.34 × 10⁻⁴
C	5.18 × 10⁻⁵	…	7.99 × 10⁻⁵
Mg	1.34 × 10⁻⁵	…	1.94 × 10⁻⁵
Ar	6.87 × 10⁻⁶	…	8.65 × 10⁻⁶
Fe	4.02 × 10⁻⁶	…	4.88 × 10⁻⁶
Mo	3.11 × 10⁻⁶	…	3.87 × 10⁻⁶
	1s²3lnl′: α₀ = 1s²2s → α = 1s²3p
Be	3.44 × 10⁻⁵	1.97 × 10⁻⁶	2.88 × 10⁻⁵
C	6.45 × 10⁻⁵	6.61 × 10⁻⁶	6.98 × 10⁻⁵
Mg	6.43 × 10⁻⁵	2.57 × 10⁻⁵	6.96 × 10⁻⁵
Ar	4.55 × 10⁻⁵	2.42 × 10⁻⁵	5.15 × 10⁻⁵
Fe	2.61 × 10⁻⁵	1.57 × 10⁻⁵	3.54 × 10⁻⁵
Mo	8.61 × 10⁻⁶	6.48 × 10⁻⁶	1.89 × 10⁻⁵
	1s²4lnl′: α₀ = 1s²2s → α = 1s²4p
Be	1.60 × 10⁻⁵	3.47 × 10⁻⁷	1.10 × 10⁻⁵
C	2.52 × 10⁻⁵	3.39 × 10⁻⁷	2.23 × 10⁻⁵
Mg	2.06 × 10⁻⁵	1.30 × 10⁻⁶	1.87 × 10⁻⁵
Ar	1.29 × 10⁻⁵	2.05 × 10⁻⁶	1.27 × 10⁻⁵
Fe	6.54 × 10⁻⁶	2.00 × 10⁻⁶	8.01 × 10⁻⁶
Mo	1.87 × 10⁻⁶	1.17 × 10⁻⁶	3.82 × 10⁻⁶

Table 2. Fitting coefficients according to Eqs. (3.20) and (3.21) for DR into H-like ions originating from the 2lnl′ and 3lnl′ autoionizing levels, with Z = Z_n, m = 1, and l₀ = 0. The numerical data include corrections for multiple decay channels (two channels for 2lnl′ and four channels for 3lnl′).

View table

View in Article

Table 2. Fitting coefficients according to Eqs. (3.20) and (3.21) for DR into H-like ions originating from the 2lnl′ and 3lnl′ autoionizing levels, with Z = Z_n, m = 1, and l₀ = 0. The numerical data include corrections for multiple decay channels (two channels for 2lnl′ and four channels for 3lnl′).

	2lnl′: α₀ = 1s → α = 2p		3lnl′: α₀ = 1s→α = 3p
Element	B_d	χ_d	B_d	χ_d
He	3.12 × 10⁻⁴	0.744	5.48 × 10⁻⁶	0.888
Li	3.72 × 10⁻⁴	0.736	6.41 × 10⁻⁶	0.887
Be	3.67 × 10⁻⁴	0.727	6.53 × 10⁻⁶	0.885
B	3.42 × 10⁻⁴	0.718	6.47 × 10⁻⁶	0.883
C	3.13 × 10⁻⁴	0.709	6.32 × 10⁻⁶	0.881
N	2.85 × 10⁻⁴	0.700	6.31 × 10⁻⁶	0.879
O	2.58 × 10⁻⁴	0.691	5.92 × 10⁻⁶	0.877
F	2.33 × 10⁻⁴	0.682	5.70 × 10⁻⁶	0.874
Ne	2.11 × 10⁻⁴	0.673	5.48 × 10⁻⁶	0.872
Na	1.90 × 10⁻⁴	0.665	5.26 × 10⁻⁶	0.870
Mg	1.72 × 10⁻⁴	0.657	5.04 × 10⁻⁶	0.868
Al	1.56 × 10⁻⁴	0.649	4.84 × 10⁻⁶	0.866
Si	1.41 × 10⁻⁴	0.642	4.63 × 10⁻⁶	0.863
P	1.27 × 10⁻⁴	0.636	4.43 × 10⁻⁶	0.861
S	1.15 × 10⁻⁴	0.630	4.24 × 10⁻⁶	0.859
Cl	1.05 × 10⁻⁴	0.624	4.05 × 10⁻⁶	0.857
Ar	9.50 × 10⁻⁵	0.620	3.87 × 10⁻⁶	0.856
K	8.61 × 10⁻⁵	0.616	3.69 × 10⁻⁶	0.854
C	7.82 × 10⁻⁵	0.612	3.52 × 10⁻⁶	0.852
Sc	7.09 × 10⁻⁵	0.609	3.35 × 10⁻⁶	0.851
Ti	6.45 × 10⁻⁵	0.606	3.19 × 10⁻⁶	0.849
V	5.85 × 10⁻⁵	0.604	3.04 × 10⁻⁶	0.848
Cr	5.33 × 10⁻⁵	0.602	2.89 × 10⁻⁶	0.847
Mn	4.85 × 10⁻⁵	0.601	2.74 × 10⁻⁶	0.846
Fe	4.42 × 10⁻⁵	0.599	2.60 × 10⁻⁶	0.845
Co	4.03 × 10⁻⁵	0.598	2.47 × 10⁻⁶	0.844
Ni	3.68 × 10⁻⁵	0.598	2.34 × 10⁻⁶	0.843
Cu	3.37 × 10⁻⁵	0.597	2.22 × 10⁻⁶	0.842
Zn	3.08 × 10⁻⁵	0.597	2.10 × 10⁻⁶	0.842
Ga	2.83 × 10⁻⁵	0.596	1.99 × 10⁻⁶	0.842
Ge	2.60 × 10⁻⁵	0.596	1.88 × 10⁻⁶	0.841
As	2.39 × 10⁻⁵	0.596	1.78 × 10⁻⁶	0.841
Se	2.20 × 10⁻⁵	0.596	1.68 × 10⁻⁶	0.841
Br	2.03 × 10⁻⁵	0.596	1.59 × 10⁻⁶	0.841
Kr	1.88 × 10⁻⁵	0.596	1.50 × 10⁻⁶	0.841
Rb	1.74 × 10⁻⁵	0.597	1.42 × 10⁻⁶	0.841
Sr	1.61 × 10⁻⁵	0.597	1.34 × 10⁻⁶	0.842
Y	1.50 × 10⁻⁵	0.597	1.27 × 10⁻⁶	0.842
Zr	1.39 × 10⁻⁵	0.598	1.20 × 10⁻⁶	0.842
Nb	1.30 × 10⁻⁵	0.599	1.13 × 10⁻⁶	0.843
Mo	1.21 × 10⁻⁵	0.599	1.07 × 10⁻⁶	0.843

Table 3. Fitting coefficients according to Eqs. (3.20) and (3.21) for DR into He-like ions originating from the 1s2lnl′ and 1s3lnl′ autoionizing levels, with Z = Z_n − 1, m = 2, and l₀ = 0. The numerical data include corrections for multiple decay channels (two channels for 1s2lnl′ and four channels for 1s3lnl′).

View table

View in Article

Table 3. Fitting coefficients according to Eqs. (3.20) and (3.21) for DR into He-like ions originating from the 1s2lnl′ and 1s3lnl′ autoionizing levels, with Z = Z_n − 1, m = 2, and l₀ = 0. The numerical data include corrections for multiple decay channels (two channels for 1s2lnl′ and four channels for 1s3lnl′).

	1s2lnl′: α₀ = 1s² → α = 1s2p		1s3lnl′: α₀ = 1s² → α = 1s3p
Element	B_d	χ_d	B_d	χ_d
Li	3.39 × 10⁻⁵	1.11	1.57 × 10⁻⁶	1.27
Be	9.94 × 10⁻⁵	0.961	2.12 × 10⁻⁶	1.14
B	1.53 × 10⁻⁴	0.891	2.51 × 10⁻⁶	1.07
C	1.93 × 10⁻⁴	0.848	2.98 × 10⁻⁶	1.03
N	2.17 × 10⁻⁴	0.818	3.40 × 10⁻⁶	1.00
O	2.34 × 10⁻⁴	0.795	3.92 × 10⁻⁶	0.983
F	2.17 × 10⁻⁴	0.775	4.23 × 10⁻⁶	0.967
Ne	2.05 × 10⁻⁴	0.757	4.50 × 10⁻⁶	0.956
Na	1.88 × 10⁻⁴	0.740	4.56 × 10⁻⁶	0.945
Mg	1.72 × 10⁻⁴	0.726	4.54 × 10⁻⁶	0.937
Al	1.57 × 10⁻⁴	0.713	4.47 × 10⁻⁶	0.929
Si	1.43 × 10⁻⁴	0.701	4.36 × 10⁻⁶	0.922
P	1.30 × 10⁻⁴	0.690	4.22 × 10⁻⁶	0.916
S	1.18 × 10⁻⁴	0.681	4.07 × 10⁻⁶	0.910
Cl	1.07 × 10⁻⁴	0.672	3.92 × 10⁻⁶	0.905
Ar	9.72 × 10⁻⁵	0.664	3.76 × 10⁻⁶	0.901
K	8.83 × 10⁻⁵	0.658	3.61 × 10⁻⁶	0.897
C	8.02 × 10⁻⁵	0.652	3.45 × 10⁻⁶	0.893
Sc	7.28 × 10⁻⁵	0.647	3.30 × 10⁻⁶	0.889
Ti	6.62 × 10⁻⁵	0.642	3.15 × 10⁻⁶	0.886
V	6.02 × 10⁻⁵	0.638	3.01 × 10⁻⁶	0.883
Cr	5.47 × 10⁻⁵	0.635	2.87 × 10⁻⁶	0.880
Mn	4.98 × 10⁻⁵	0.632	2.73 × 10⁻⁶	0.877
Fe	4.54 × 10⁻⁵	0.629	2.60 × 10⁻⁶	0.875
Co	4.14 × 10⁻⁵	0.627	2.47 × 10⁻⁶	0.873
Ni	3.78 × 10⁻⁵	0.625	2.35 × 10⁻⁶	0.871
Cu	3.46 × 10⁻⁵	0.623	2.23 × 10⁻⁶	0.869
Zn	3.16 × 10⁻⁵	0.622	2.11 × 10⁻⁶	0.868
Ga	2.90 × 10⁻⁵	0.620	2.00 × 10⁻⁶	0.867
Ge	2.67 × 10⁻⁵	0.619	1.90 × 10⁻⁶	0.865
As	2.45 × 10⁻⁵	0.619	1.80 × 10⁻⁶	0.864
Se	2.26 × 10⁻⁵	0.618	1.70 × 10⁻⁶	0.864
Br	2.08 × 10⁻⁵	0.617	1.61 × 10⁻⁶	0.863
Kr	1.93 × 10⁻⁵	0.617	1.52 × 10⁻⁶	0.862
Rb	1.78 × 10⁻⁵	0.616	1.44 × 10⁻⁶	0.862
Sr	1.65 × 10⁻⁵	0.616	1.36 × 10⁻⁶	0.861
Y	1.53 × 10⁻⁵	0.616	1.29 × 10⁻⁶	0.861
Zr	1.43 × 10⁻⁵	0.616	1.22 × 10⁻⁶	0.861
Nb	1.33 × 10⁻⁵	0.616	1.15 × 10⁻⁶	0.861
Mo	1.24 × 10⁻⁵	0.616	1.09 × 10⁻⁶	0.861

Table 4. Fitting coefficients according to Eqs. (3.20) and (3.21) for DR into Li-like ions originating from the 1s²2lnl′ and 1s²3lnl′ autoionizing levels, with Z = Z_n − 2, m = 1, and l₀ = 0. The numerical data include corrections for multiple decay channels (one channel for 1s²2lnl′ and four channels for 1s²3lnl′).

View table

View in Article

Table 4. Fitting coefficients according to Eqs. (3.20) and (3.21) for DR into Li-like ions originating from the 1s²2lnl′ and 1s²3lnl′ autoionizing levels, with Z = Z_n − 2, m = 1, and l₀ = 0. The numerical data include corrections for multiple decay channels (one channel for 1s²2lnl′ and four channels for 1s²3lnl′).

	1s²2lnl′: α₀ = 1s²2s → α = 1s²2p		1s²3lnl′: α₀ = 1s²2s → α = 1s²3p
Element	B_d	χ_d	B_d	χ_d
Be	8.09 × 10⁻⁵	0.057 1	1.97 × 10⁻⁶	0.197
B	6.86 × 10⁻⁵	0.040 0	2.85 × 10⁻⁶	0.173
C	5.18 × 10⁻⁵	0.030 6	6.61 × 10⁻⁶	0.161
N	3.95 × 10⁻⁵	0.024 8	1.06 × 10⁻⁵	0.153
O	3.09 × 10⁻⁵	0.020 7	1.47 × 10⁻⁵	0.149
F	2.47 × 10⁻⁵	0.017 9	1.85 × 10⁻⁵	0.145
Ne	2.02 × 10⁻⁵	0.015 6	2.17 × 10⁻⁵	0.142
Na	1.69 × 10⁻⁵	0.013 9	2.41 × 10⁻⁵	0.140
Mg	1.43 × 10⁻⁵	0.012 6	2.57 × 10⁻⁵	0.138
Al	1.23 × 10⁻⁵	0.011 5	2.67 × 10⁻⁵	0.136
Si	1.07 × 10⁻⁵	0.010 5	2.71 × 10⁻⁵	0.135
P	9.43 × 10⁻⁶	0.009 81	2.69 × 10⁻⁵	0.133
S	8.41 × 10⁻⁶	0.009 14	2.60 × 10⁻⁵	0.131
Cl	7.57 × 10⁻⁶	0.008 58	2.53 × 10⁻⁵	0.130
Ar	6.87 × 10⁻⁶	0.008 09	2.42 × 10⁻⁵	0.128
K	6.25 × 10⁻⁶	0.007 72	2.31 × 10⁻⁵	0.127
C	5.76 × 10⁻⁶	0.007 36	2.19 × 10⁻⁵	0.126
Sc	5.35 × 10⁻⁶	0.007 04	2.09 × 10⁻⁵	0.124
Ti	5.00 × 10⁻⁶	0.006 77	1.97 × 10⁻⁵	0.123
V	4.67 × 10⁻⁶	0.006 58	1.86 × 10⁻⁵	0.122
Cr	4.42 × 10⁻⁶	0.006 37	1.76 × 10⁻⁵	0.120
Mn	4.20 × 10⁻⁶	0.006 20	1.66 × 10⁻⁵	0.119
Fe	4.02 × 10⁻⁶	0.006 05	1.57 × 10⁻⁵	0.118
Co	3.86 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 92	1.48 × 10⁻⁵	0.117
Ni	3.72 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 81	1.40 × 10⁻⁵	0.116
Cu	3.61 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 71	1.32 × 10⁻⁵	0.115
Zn	3.51 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 64	1.25 × 10⁻⁵	0.114
Ga	3.42 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 58	1.18 × 10⁻⁵	0.113
Ge	3.35 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 53	1.11 × 10⁻⁵	0.112
As	3.25 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 56	1.05 × 10⁻⁵	0.111
Se	3.20 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 54	9.96 × 10⁻⁶	0.110
Br	3.20 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 46	9.43 × 10⁻⁶	0.109
Kr	3.17 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 46	8.92 × 10⁻⁶	0.108
Rb	3.15 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 47	8.45 × 10⁻⁶	0.107
Sr	3.13 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 48	8.01 × 10⁻⁶	0.106
Y	3.12 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 51	7.59 × 10⁻⁶	0.105
Zr	3.11 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 54	7.20 × 10⁻⁶	0.105
Nb	3.11 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 58	6.83 × 10⁻⁶	0.104
Mo	3.11 × 10⁻⁶	0.005 63	6.48 × 10⁻⁶	0.103

Table 5. Fitting coefficients according to Eqs. (3.20) and (3.21) for DR into excited states of Li-like ions originating from the 1s²3lnl′ and 1s²4lnl′ autoionizing levels, with Z = Z_n − 2, m = 1, and l₀ = 1. The numerical data include corrections for multiple decay channels (three channels for 1s²3lnl′ and six channels for 1s²4lnl′).

View table

View in Article

Table 5. Fitting coefficients according to Eqs. (3.20) and (3.21) for DR into excited states of Li-like ions originating from the 1s²3lnl′ and 1s²4lnl′ autoionizing levels, with Z = Z_n − 2, m = 1, and l₀ = 1. The numerical data include corrections for multiple decay channels (three channels for 1s²3lnl′ and six channels for 1s²4lnl′).

	1s²3lnl′: α₀ = 1s²2p → α = 1s²3d		1s²4lnl′: α₀ = 1s²2p → α = 1s²4d
Element	B_d	χ_d	B_d	χ_d
Be	1.78 × 10⁻⁴	0.140	1.88 × 10⁻⁵	0.190
B	2.99 × 10⁻⁴	0.137	2.01 × 10⁻⁵	0.189
C	3.74 × 10⁻⁴	0.135	2.04 × 10⁻⁵	0.188
N	4.44 × 10⁻⁴	0.133	2.18 × 10⁻⁵	0.187
O	5.15 × 10⁻⁴	0.131	2.35 × 10⁻⁵	0.187
F	5.52 × 10⁻⁴	0.130	2.53 × 10⁻⁵	0.186
Ne	5.65 × 10⁻⁴	0.128	2.67 × 10⁻⁵	0.185
Na	5.76 × 10⁻⁴	0.127	2.88 × 10⁻⁵	0.181
Mg	5.73 × 10⁻⁴	0.125	3.28 × 10⁻⁵	0.174
Al	5.61 × 10⁻⁴	0.124	3.32 × 10⁻⁵	0.172
Si	5.39 × 10⁻⁴	0.122	3.33 × 10⁻⁵	0.171
P	5.19 × 10⁻⁴	0.120	3.48 × 10⁻⁵	0.167
S	4.96 × 10⁻⁴	0.119	3.46 × 10⁻⁵	0.165
Cl	4.71 × 10⁻⁴	0.117	3.44 × 10⁻⁵	0.164
Ar	4.48 × 10⁻⁴	0.115	3.41 × 10⁻⁵	0.163
K	4.25 × 10⁻⁴	0.114	3.38 × 10⁻⁵	0.161
C	4.04 × 10⁻⁴	0.112	3.34 × 10⁻⁵	0.160
Sc	3.83 × 10⁻⁴	0.110	3.30 × 10⁻⁵	0.159
Ti	3.64 × 10⁻⁴	0.109	3.25 × 10⁻⁵	0.158
V	3.45 × 10⁻⁴	0.107	3.20 × 10⁻⁵	0.157
Cr	3.27 × 10⁻⁴	0.105	3.14 × 10⁻⁵	0.156
Mn	3.11 × 10⁻⁴	0.104	3.08 × 10⁻⁵	0.156
Fe	2.95 × 10⁻⁴	0.102	3.02 × 10⁻⁵	0.155
Co	2.80 × 10⁻⁴	0.101	2.95 × 10⁻⁵	0.154
Ni	2.66 × 10⁻⁴	0.0992	2.88 × 10⁻⁵	0.154
Cu	2.53 × 10⁻⁴	0.0978	2.80 × 10⁻⁵	0.153
Zn	2.40 × 10⁻⁴	0.0964	2.72 × 10⁻⁵	0.153
Ga	2.28 × 10⁻⁴	0.0951	2.64 × 10⁻⁵	0.153
Ge	2.17 × 10⁻⁴	0.0939	2.56 × 10⁻⁵	0.152
As	2.06 × 10⁻⁴	0.0927	2.47 × 10⁻⁵	0.152
Se	1.96 × 10⁻⁴	0.0916	2.39 × 10⁻⁵	0.152
Br	1.86 × 10⁻⁴	0.0905	2.30 × 10⁻⁵	0.152
Kr	1.77 × 10⁻⁴	0.0895	2.22 × 10⁻⁵	0.152
Rb	1.68 × 10⁻⁴	0.0885	2.14 × 10⁻⁵	0.152
Sr	1.60 × 10⁻⁴	0.0876	2.05 × 10⁻⁵	0.152
Y	1.52 × 10⁻⁴	0.0867	1.97 × 10⁻⁵	0.152
Zr	1.45 × 10⁻⁴	0.0859	1.89 × 10⁻⁵	0.152
Nb	1.38 × 10⁻⁴	0.0851	1.82 × 10⁻⁵	0.152
Mo	1.31 × 10⁻⁴	0.0844	1.74 × 10⁻⁵	0.152

Table 6. Field-free autoionization decay rates (s⁻¹) including intermediate coupling, configuration, and magnetic interaction.

View table

View in Article

Table 6. Field-free autoionization decay rates (s⁻¹) including intermediate coupling, configuration, and magnetic interaction.

State	Z_n = 3	Z_n = 6	Z_n = 13	Z_n = 18	Z_n = 26	Z_n = 42
2p²¹S₀	8.4 × 10¹⁰	5.1 × 10¹²	1.3 × 10¹³	1.9 × 10¹³	3.4 × 10¹³	7.0 × 10¹³
2p²¹D₂	1.5 × 10¹⁴	2.5 × 10¹⁴	3.1 × 10¹⁴	3.1 × 10¹⁴	2.3 × 10¹⁴	2.1 × 10¹⁴
2p²³P₀	2.9 × 10⁷	2.3 × 10⁹	2.3 × 10¹¹	1.2 × 10¹²	3.7 × 10¹²	2.8 × 10¹²
2p²³P₁	0	0	0	0	0	0
2p²³P₁ with Breit interaction	2.6 × 10⁷	6.8 × 10⁸	1.9 × 10¹⁰	7.2 × 10¹⁰	3.2 × 10¹¹	2.2 × 10¹²
2p²³P₂	1.1 × 10⁹	3.1 × 10¹⁰	3.0 × 10¹²	2.1 × 10¹³	1.1 × 10¹⁴	1.5 × 10¹⁴

Tools

Get Citation

Copy Citation Text

F. B. Rosmej, V. A. Astapenko, V. S. Lisitsa, L. A. Vainshtein. Dielectronic recombination in non-LTE plasmas[J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2020, 5(6): 064201

Download Citation

EndNote(RIS)BibTex Plain Text

Set citation alerts for article

Save article for my favorites

Paper Information

Category: Fundamental Physics At Extreme Light

Received: May. 18, 2020

Accepted: Sep. 2, 2020

Published Online: Nov. 24, 2020

The Author Email: Rosmej F. B. (frank.rosmej@sorbonne-universite.fr)

DOI:10.1063/5.0014158

Topics

laser devices and laser physics

Lasers and Laser Optics

Laser physics

laser manufacturing

Instrumentation, Measurement and Metrology

Table 6. Field-free autoionization decay rates (s−1) including intermediate coupling, configuration, and magnetic interaction.

Table 6. Field-free autoionization decay rates (s−1) including intermediate coupling, configuration, and magnetic interaction.

微信扫一扫：分享

Table 6. Field-free autoionization decay rates (s⁻¹) including intermediate coupling, configuration, and magnetic interaction.

Table 6. Field-free autoionization decay rates (s⁻¹) including intermediate coupling, configuration, and magnetic interaction.